Why did MOH provide statistics from 2008 on comparison of foreign patients admitted to public hospitals?

Public institutions should stop giving selective statistics, as it is arguably in a sense like ‘fake news’ or ‘propaganda’ which may only further undermine the already diluted trust of the public in our public institutions 

I refer to the article “Percentage of foreigners admitted to public hospitals falls from 2008” by Sunday Times, on the stop of public healthcare institutions (PHIs) engaging foreign agents to bring in overseas patients

Ministry of Health (MOH) was quoted by the paper: “Only a small proportion of the hospitals’ patients were brought in via contracted overseas service providers… The majority of patients they see are locals.”

MOH further states that the percentage of foreigners admitted to public hospitals here last year was lower than that for 2008. The proportion of foreigners among all inpatient and day surgery patients dropped to about 1.5 per cent. That figure was 2.4 per cent in 2008.

One of the primary reasons why foreign patients in public hospitals have decreased in proportion to the total number of patients, compared to 2008, may be because  as I understand it – the policy was changed in October 2007, such that foreign patients who choose subsidised wards may have to pay as much as 5 times that of a Singaporean patient.

Don’t you find it rather strange that we are told only of the 2008 data to compare with now?

What about the percentage in the last year, last 3 and 5 years?

As to MOM’s claim that only a small proportion of the hospitals’ patients were brought in via contracted overseas service providers and that the majority of patients they see are locals – What is the percentage of foreign patients in the non-subsidised wards, instead of all wards?

What is the total sum of referral fees paid in the last year, last 3 and 5 years?

Doctors have been barred from paying referral fees to third parties since December 2016 by the Singapore Medical Council (SMC). Following the ban, the SMC president Tan Ser Kiat said in an advisory to doctors, the amount of third-party administrators (TPAs) work does not vary based on the fees that doctors charge their patients, paying percentage fees to the TPAs may be construed as a form of “fee-splitting” and could inadvertently promote cost escalation.

As the ministry overseeing public healthcare, why did MOH allow public hospitals to carry out the practice until its ban last month?

After all, isn’t this arguably, in the public interest, and in line with the online falsehoods’ committee’s recommendation that the Government should give the reasons for decisions not to disclose information to the public, and to gain the trust of the public?

 

Leong Sze Hian

 

 

Sponsored Content

5 Responses to “Why did MOH provide statistics from 2008 on comparison of foreign patients admitted to public hospitals?”

  • Bapak:

    Manipulation using selective statistics to make them look good is as good as creating fake news. PAP is the master in fake news creation.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • LIONS:

    Whats *fake news* compared to OFFICIAL FAKE STATISTICS?
    Fake news is all around us; we call it gossips or rumours n it exists side by side with REAL news all the time.

    But,FAKE STATS FROM GOVT IS TRULY IRRESPONSIBLE N SHUD BE STOPPED!

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Read the OXFAM REPORT:

    Read the new OXFAM report 2018 ..go online. Report out today. Of course our gov disputing the claims.
    Sg in bottom 10 countries.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • HarderTruths:

    Only if you have constipation it may help to read it until you are cured.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Transparent - Until Not ?:

    >” Don’t you find it rather strange that we are told only of the 2008 data to compare with now?”
    -
    Simple answer.
    The AristoCATs got something to hide. . . :(

    GD Star Rating
    loading...

Leave a Reply

 characters available

Member Services
Members LoginSelf-ClassifiedsSelf-Support
Sponsored Advertisement

Search On TR Emeritus
Sponsored Advertisement


Most Recent Comments
  • Tremendous: Young nation or not, you’ll know that Singapore is heading quickly towards its twilight years if...
  • Tremendous: This is ridiculous. Apart from the vast difference in bonus amounts, members of a certain party expect to...
  • TUCK WAN: Maybe only MIW found a way money transfer thru western union for the departed aunties amd uncles. Will...
  • Rabble-rouser: Cleaners are an anachronistic relic of the past. I find it amusing that the PAP continually holding up...
  • Half Empty ParlIament!: Where are our Elected MPs? Bo Chap or Bo heel? How to vote for you again?
  • Where are our Elected MPs?: All enjoying their year end holidays? How to represent us in Parliament? How to vote for...
  • Bad Boy: Advice from Bad Boy . Just take note … 据中国央视网引用中国国家卫健委的最新统计,中国成人糖尿病的患 病率已经高达11.6%,患者人数超过1.14亿。 Real or...
  • Where are our Elected MPs?: Get them to attend Parliament Sitting please! More than 50% of the White MPs did not...
  • Attention!: Whoever can guarantee to return back our CPF in full & part of our medisave ( theyre deducting too...
  • Rabble-rouser: @ patriot: When a Western kid falls down, his dad will ask him to get up by himself & if he cries,...
  • Where are our Elected MPs?: Get the white MPs to attend Parliament Sitting please! Late L*Y would have should...
Announcements
Advertisement
Visitors Statistic
Latest Statistic
Advertisements