PSC: Scholars’ diversity – no data?

I refer to the article “Public Service Commission to explore new tools to select more diverse slate of scholarship holders” (Straits Times, Oct 31).

It states that “Singapore’s Public Service Commission (PSC) will explore new tools to ensure that it awards its prestigious scholarship to a more diverse range of students.

In an open letter released on Wednesday (Oct 31), PSC chairman Lee Tzu Yang set out the importance of diversity in the public service and how the move is part of the commission’s ongoing efforts to cast its net wide for Singaporeans from all backgrounds.

For example, he said, many organisations today use game-based assessments to assess candidates for attributes such as perseverance, learning orientation and risk-avoidance.”

All these sounds very good, but shouldn’t the PSC start by giving us some statistics?

Are we giving too many scholarships to richer students?

In this connection, I would like to refer to the article “Making a Mockery of Meritocracy” (The Independent, Jan 6).

It states that “Over the years, how many government scholarships have been gifted to children of those at the top echelons of government and public service? For every one that is given out, another deserving Singaporean loses out – and that Singaporean could be in dire need of a scholarship because he or she comes from a not-well-to-do family.”

In this connection, I believe that the last time that arguably – a very comprehensive analysis and commentary on the “meritocracy” of awarding scholarships, was published was in 2008.

There were media reports then, about the break-down of scholarship awardees who stay in HDB and private property.

I would like to suggest again that the percentage of scholars from HDB flats be further broken down to the different flat types, i.e. 1 – 2 room, 3-room, 4-room, and 5-room and bigger. Since the private property data was broken down to landed and condominiums, why not the HDB data ?

I understand that the statistics last reported in the media was that more than 60 per cent of scholars come from HDB 5-room and bigger, and private property.

According to the Department of Statistics’ (DOS) 2008 Yearbook of Statistics, 69 per cent of HDB flats were 4-room and smaller.

Since more than 80 per cent of residential dwelling units are HDB flats, the proportion of scholars from private property is disproportionately high.

Even the proportion of landed property at 26 per cent is disproportionately higher, compared to the 27 per cent for private non-landed property, as only 29 per cent of all private property are landed.

Another way of looking at it may be that students from private property have about a two times higher chance of getting a scholarship, and those from HDB 5-room and bigger about a one and a half times higher chance.

In this regard, even those in landed property have about a two times higher chance than non-landed.

Clearly, at least from a statistical perspective, the odds may be stacked against HDB 4-roomers and smaller.

What is perhaps an even more important statistic is the breakdown of the household and per capita income.

The type of residential dwelling may not necessarily reflect the financial need and affordability of the scholarship applicant.

If this trend continues, it may lead to a further widening of the income gap. Singapore’s GINI co-efficient has been deteriorating over the years, and is now near to historical highs.

Route out of poverty

Throughout history, I believe the most common route out of poverty has been education.

Whilst there is nothing wrong with awarding scholarships primarily on academic achievement, the current selection criteria and system may be further skewed against lower-income households, as their children may have less in the areas of co-curricular activities, leadership track record, etc, because of their limited financial resources.

This may further stack the odds against the lower-income, who have less resources to access tuition, enrichment programmes, learning aids, etc.

In countries like the United States, many scholarships are awarded based on financial need. Those who can afford get less money, and those who are rich are given a Honour Scholarship, i.e. in name only without money.

I support Mr Philip Yeo’s remarks about his preference to give scholarships to the lower income. Anecdotal evidence seems to suggest that most bond breakers come from more affluent families. So, the perennial problem and increasing trend of more people breaking bonds may be diminished if more scholarships go to the less affluent.

As to the remarks that the family background of applicants are not taken into account, I would like to ask whether the selection panel are able to see such information. If so, I think those involved in the selection and interview process should not be allowed to see such information.

The issue of elitism in Singapore has been much debated in the media. Let’s try to do something more about it, in the true spirit of one of the five stars of our national flag, which represents equality for all.

 

Leong Sze Hian

 

 

Sponsored Content

6 Responses to “PSC: Scholars’ diversity – no data?”

  • PAP has the mandate:

    Scholarships have to be income and asset tested. So enough funding goes to the poor and help them out of poverty.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Tremendous:

    A high ranking official, Peter Ong thought trust is the most important ingredient between the government and citizens, yet he did not demonstrate how that trust could be fostered. When citizens kept probing important records like number of scholarship holders by household income and housing type, it’s clear that members of a certain party want to hide the records and do not want to do anything meaningful. Don’t try to wriggle out with 1-2 years of records even they look more decent. Show 6-10 years of records.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • William C:

    Diversity can mean reserve for new citizens from China Chinese, Vietnamese, Filipinoes etc, or skin color

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • HarderTruths:

    All these positions already ‘chope’ by pappy machine.

    Rest of $G can eat their own s**t.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • LIONS:

    PSC = Public $ervice CON-mi$$ion.
    and PSC SCHOLARS are CONS???

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • What is fake news in pap SGP?:

    can study, once in their young lives, means can do anything?

    CAN do ANYTHING?

    fail in NOL can succeed in SPH?

    fail in smrt can succeed in sia?

    fail in AStar can continue to be paid S$m year in year out?

    fail in Aljunied can S$m in NTUC and thereafter prime minister?

    inside 200m is not within 200m? INDIAN is malay?

    heck no. remove all the clown pap fake news and the truth stares squarely at anyone who looks that it is all a facade created by clown pap to justify paying each other S$m so as not to be mediocre peanuts.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
Member Services
Self-SupportMembers Login
Sponsored Advertisement

Search On TR Emeritus
Sponsored Advertisement



Most Recent Comments
  • that wouldn't make much sense: rukidding: Tharman, Iswaran,..however can stay ! Iswaran? Didn’t he come up with...
  • Daylight robbery: Its hilarious and sad at the same time to think our G is so ever ready to grab every last drop of...
  • PC Ong, don't evade question: PC Ong: Please lah, stop complaining. We got ageing population and rising health...
  • Crapy: Its really sad for us citizens here…when we became strangers in our own country! Look all around us,...
  • TRE Techie: In this matter, I am tempted to agree with the Minister that it is really not in the best interest of the...
  • TRE Techie: One thing I have learnt from my and many other’s experience in dealing with CPF is to NEVER ASSUME...
  • NotMyProblem: In GE2015, 70% voters gave PAP a blank cheque to do whatever it wanted. Let’s see in next GE, we...
  • level of ability to think: Such is the level of their ability to think. They are not able to get it right, which...
  • LIONS: In conclusion; what is the priority ? What is the point of being barking dogs but we are being pussy inside,...
  • LIONS: guess PAP CLOWNS are being nurtured at NTUC? MORE ARE BEING CULTIVATED there? next PEE-M from this stoopid...
  • LIONS: the mire you look at it,the more you notice lee ah long is treating sgs like masak-masak. he thinks he can...
Announcements
Advertisement
Visitors Statistic
Latest Statistic
Advertisements