Assembly = One

Foreigners, even human rights activists from neighbouring countries used to tell me that Singapore is a very successful, rich and democratic country. Many admire the PAP government and even wish that their governments are as efficient and intolerant as ours. At general election rallies in 2013 in Malaysia, I heard several DAP speakers sang high praises for the PAP government. I hope their eyes are now open.

For a very long time, Singapore’s human rights record was quite flawless or at least criticisms of Singapore were few. We only read the occasional articles criticising the government. Developed countries whose high officials reside in Singapore would not offend our government save to speak against the death penalty.

In the early 1980s, my Swiss friends used to chide me when I complained about the PAP government’s tight control over Singaporeans. They had good reasons to like the PAP. Having worked hard in the jungles of Kalimantan and deprived of luxuries especially European food, they were always happy to be in civilised Singapore for their vacation. I remember that the first place they would visit when they arrive was the Yaohan supermarket. They bought their favourite cheese, muesli, bacon, milk, wine and papayas. They loved Singapore because they could get everything they wanted.

My Swiss friends’ view of Singapore however changed when back in their beautiful Swiss village, they were informed of my arrest in 1987. They were shocked that I was accused of subversion, of wanting to topple the PAP government by using “communist united front tactics”. Overnight, they became activists – protesting and writing letters. They realised that Singapore is not exactly the Switzerland of the East as our government was fond of telling the world.

Singapore’s reputation is still good. We don’t have state sponsored kidnappings and murders. But we do have state sanctioned death by hanging, imprisonment without trial and savage corporal punishment. Our laws are exceedingly brutal even for the young and prescribed minimum punishments deprive our judges of their discretionary powers and they become a bit robotic.

The right to freedom of assembly, speech and expression has never attracted the attention of Singaporeans. They are too overwhelmed by the need to work and bring food to the table. Singaporeans work long hours and have no time to ponder over these rights, at least not until they themselves are affected.

Falun Gong adherents, individuals and human rights defenders have been charged and sentenced for single person unlawful assembly and vandalism over very petty matters. Time and again, individuals have been sent to jail or pay heavy fines. Singaporeans don’t care and the government is let off.

In recent times, the Singapore government has come under a bit of scrutiny from the international community. The Public Order Act which was enacted in 2009 has earned some flak when individuals were hauled to court.
How did this law came about and why was it necessary for the government to enact such perverse laws to handle one person is gross. This law is worse than what we inherited from our colonial master. At least, the Brits respected freedom of speech and assembly. The present Singapore government treats Singaporeans worse than our coloniser.

More than a hundred years ago, the British gave us the Penal Code and the Minor Offences Ordinance now known as the Miscellaneous Offences (Public Order and Nuisance) Act. Afraid of natives organising activities to overpower the government by criminal force or commit trespass, mischief or resist execution of the law (whatever that means), they made it an offence for any gathering of five or more people pursuing such purposes. See (Section 141 of the Penal Code and the repealed section 5 of Miscellaneous Offences (Public Order and Nuisance) Act.

When the PAP came into power in 1959, it retained these laws and recognised our right to freedom of assembly, speech and expression. But as the PAP gained power they became unreasonable. They were determined to rule forever and thus enacted laws to ensure that this will be achieved. Protection of their power was paramount. Human rights are not important. After all, only a minority are affected. The majority are oblivious to what happen to their countrymen.

Parliament has been under the PAP’s control ever since the opposition left the house in 1966. This has given the PAP a free hand to enact and amend laws and even our constitution which is supposed to guarantees our fundamental liberties easily. Every law including our constitution can be amended at any time to punish an individual. Many people have been caught in this way. It is tragic, but all these misfortunes of individuals are beyond the concern of the majority of people. And we know that victims seldom have the ability or opportunity to fight back.

In 2009, “assembly” was redefined to reduce the number of participants five to just one person. The Penal Code and Miscellaneous Offences (Public Order and Nuisance) Act’s requirement that an unlawful assembly must comprise at least 5 persons whose intention is to commit a criminal act was removed.

In one fell swoop, the Public Order Act removed our constitutional rights to freedom of speech, assembly and expression. Section 2 defines “Assembly” as
“a gathering or meeting (whether or not comprising any lecture. Talk, address, debate or discussion) of persons the purpose (or one of the purposes) of which is -

(a) to demonstrate support for or opposition to the views or actions of any person, group of persons or any government;

(b) to publicise a cause or campaign; or

(c) to mark or commemorate any event.

and includes a demonstration by a person alone for any such purpose referred to in paragraph (a), (b) or (c).

Our lawmakers have criminalised peaceful assembly, free speech and expression. They have abused our constitution. And our ministers have ensured that such oppressive laws are enforced.

Many Singaporeans have since been convicted of the offence of unlawful assembly. Many have served jail time.

I do not know of any developed country that has laws that prohibit citizens from peaceful protests and expressions in public spaces. Let me know if you can find one. Until then, Singapore is truly a unique first world country. When assembly is defined as one person we have vandalised the English language and make it exclusively Singaporean. Will our courts ever rule that the Public Order Act is unconstitutional one day?


Teo Soh Lung



Sponsored Content

8 Responses to “Assembly = One”

  • ganeshsk:

    “Will our courts ever rule that the Public Order Act is unconstitutional one day?”




    GD Star Rating
  • bgkl:

    By the way, whose farken genius idea to install xray machines in MRT stations and have part-time uncles and aunties to selectively choose people during peak-hour foot traffic to get scanned? To combat terrorism. Utter Bullshit! I got selected so I must look dangerous! Now you see, the machines suddenly disappear just as fast. I tell you, chao papayas are going to get it from me for oppression!

    GD Star Rating
  • no trust /trust left in PAP:

    not an option any longer…they need to go.
    just give your vote to the alternative parties.

    GD Star Rating
  • ASS is back:

    SL too long lah… the top half i got a mix feeling, I thought you are from the PAP leh?


    ASS is back with sizzling news on one guy Rob.Son Lee….
    Maybe from the lee family or what? Lawyer letter received…. hahahahahaha
    Calling for pro-bono lawyers!

    Also bikini girl. Support them.

    GD Star Rating
  • LIONS:



    GD Star Rating
  • Gan Boh Yong:

    If one person can be considered illegal assembly, the only thing more ridiculous is the fact that it’s the people who voted them.

    GD Star Rating
  • Get What You Voted:

    ONE person or Three-man assembly joke has been around before the last election and by election, for many years , since the days of Dr Chee’s fixing when the dead man was still alive. No one knows when the three-man becomes one man, but it is not important, as the greedy pigs and cronies have unfettering rights to adulterate and interpret the law as they wish.
    This constituted to the eventual big mess in this country once criticisms are muted.
    Daft sinkies already approved it, so why kaopay now?
    Suck up the pain, you deserve it.

    GD Star Rating
  • Dr Tan Tai Wei:

    For “transparency”, truthfulness and justice (and not “fake news”), it must clearly be stated that a one-person public “protest”, “demonstration”, etc., is outlawed. Mustn’t, for propagandistic gain (smacking of dishonesty, lying, etc.), lump it under law that curbs “assembly”, thus smuggling over to the “offence” purported severities pertaining only to effects of grouping and crowding. Issue pertains to governance “incorruptibility”.

    GD Star Rating
Member Services
Self-SupportMembers Login
Sponsored Advertisement

Search On TR Emeritus
Sponsored Advertisement

Most Recent Comments
  • MarBowling: Ministers resign in protest: May 24, 2019 at 3:36 am (Quote) You don’t think this is about Singapore, do...
  • mike: half-of-singaporeans-support-a nti-fake-news-bill-yougov-rese arch/ This is one...
  • nihon: wp holders can marry sgs. I have fren who has masters and married a domestic helper. now they have kids and...
  • Ministers resign in protest: You don’t think this is about Singapore, do you? It’s about UK. Ministers...
  • Note to kenneth j: Whatever it is notwithstanding;nothing we can do ; we have to be careful and not cross the line...
  • TruBlu: Lets just say,there is only ONE RULER. The rest are just saying what they have been instructed. It is...
  • Great Asia try to hard: In China, people also worship Mao like a deity in a Taoist temple.
  • Ho, ho, ho! HoLee Baloney?: TREA$URE TROVE OF TRILLION$ - Alibaba is 阿李 の ばば (‘old aunty’) in disguise...
  • Ho, ho, ho! HoLee Baloney?: Oh, and have I mentioned? The other goodie$ (that anyone can logically come up with, no...
  • C’est la vie: ***** Bala’s a perfect fit for the Action Party. Overspend public money and has no regrets. Selfie with...
  • Ho, ho, ho! HoLee Baloney?: I have said this countless times before, and I will say it again: Your first family (for...
  • William C: Political party cannot have foreign funding. If yes, the is considered more interfering in domestic...
  • William C: Leadership without a vision? Just follow orders from PM3. Just a Manager level job can take million...
  • William C: Drawing salaries on par with CEO but not taking accountability like them. When economy is no good, blame...
  • William C: If say negative thing then is interfering domestic PLUS faked news now
  • William C: Sinkies are uniqued. They don’t care about all these. As long as they have a job, an income, a HDB,...
Visitors Statistic
Latest Statistic