What Foreign Pundits Really Mean When They Say Singapore Is ‘Small Government’

On Saturday Adrian Wooldridge, Political Editor of the Economist and author of the Bagehot column, made the following extraordinary comment about Singapore in a tweet:

Singapore’s effectiveness in treating Covid-19, at least for now and as far as we know, given the limited information flows allowing one to judge, has more to do with its small geographical size and its previous experience in dealing with SARS and H1N1. Democracies like South Korea, Taiwan and Germany have shown themselves to be equally or more efficient.

However even if we take at face value the claim that Singapore has dealt with the crisis well it is clearly absurd for the Economist editor to attribute this to Singapore’s government being smaller than Britain’s.. I am not an advocate for a new age of big government by any means and Wooldridge is right to raise concerns but he once again has completely misunderstood or willfully misrepresented Singapore.

In fact when commentators like Adrian Wooldridge praise Singapore for “small government” what they really mean is that they like the low taxes here, especially the zero tax on unearned income and capital gains and the opportunity it gives people like them to accumulate wealth before going back to higher-tax areas of their birth where they retire to benefit from universal health care in old age. The icing on the cake is that of course they do not have to do do national service which at two years length amounts to a tax of 5-10% extra on lifetime income.

Apart from loving paying little or no tax why would Western writers think that Singapore has “small government” in terms of owning less of the economy ? Firstly the Government uses a deliberately misleading format for its Budget which excludes the earnings of Temasek, GIC, MAS and other state-owned but corporatised entities like Changi Airport Group and SingHealth as well as revenues from land sales. Since the Government owns over 80% of the land the latter alone amounts to tens of billions of dollars.

When we look at Government operating revenues rather than General Government, which should include all state-owned entities, we get a figure of about 15% as a percentage of GDP while operating and development expenditures combined are about 16.5% of GDP. This looks low. Far lower than the US figure of some 24% while the OECD average is around 34% and the UK is around the same or slightly lower. It is this artificially low figure which many right-wing commentators use to claim that Singapore is a paragon of “small government” when it is nothing of the sort.

What should we really be looking at? As a measure of the Government’s ownership of the economy, Temasek’s net asset figure in 2018 was about one-third of Singapore’s stock market capitalization. This percentage would undoubtedly be higher if the stock market capitalization excluded cross-shareholdings and double-counting of holding companies. In measuring the degree of Government control of the economy this percentage is only of listed companies and does not take account of GIC, MAS and other significant entities like Changi Airport Group.

The ruling party also separately owns the major supermarket chain through its state trade union arm, NTUC, and the major pre-school education provider, as well as having influence over many of the major corporates not Government owned by the presence of PAP MPs and ex-Ministers on the board or in the executive suite.

The Government is not small by any other definition either. In fact the Economist itself famously called the Singapore Government the “stingy nanny”.. Ownership of most of the land means that 90% of Singaporeans live in public housing (HDB) on a 99-year leasehold. There are many restrictive conditions tied to HDB including compulsory repurchase if you breach any rules or the Government sees a profitable redevelopment opportunity. At the end of your 99-year leasehold your property will revert to the Government which gives it an extraordinary degree of control over the population in a situation where central government is also your landlord. You cannot necessarily choose where you want to live because of the Ethnic Integration Act which aims to ensure that each estate and constituency mirrors the national racial mix of 76% Chinese, 14% Malay and 8% Indian.

The Government also controls people’s savings through the compulsory savings scheme (CPF) which can be used to purchase housing (again mostly public) or deferred till retirement, when a panoply of restrictive conditions make it difficult to withdraw your money as well as the requirement that a significant percentage be retained to pay for medical care, of which the usage is highly restricted.

Other than statistics which paint the Government in a positive light, it is almost impossible to obtain any information because Singapore has no Freedom of Information Act. No one in Singapore from the President down can even find out the size of the reserves. and until I started raising questions Singaporeans were too scared to even ask what the PM Lee’s wife, Ho Ching, pays herself with her husband’s approval. Her remuneration is presumably so enormous that the Government refuses to tell us.

Singapore is certainly not “small government” when it comes to restricting individual rights and freedoms. The Government has a huge armoury of restrictive laws ranging from sedition, detention without trial, defamation, to the new Protection from Online Falsehood and Manipulation Act (POFMA). These restrictions ensure that even critics make sure that they self-censor or risk being driven into exile by direct action or just through being deprived of the ability to earn a livelihood, just as critics of Eastern European Communist regimes were and of China still are. In fact Singapore resembles more the Communist state caricature in Hayek’s Road to Serfdom than any libertarian free-market paradise.

Woolridge writes for the Economist so I am not sure what his excuse for being ignorant of our economy is but this misrepresentation is somewhat of a meme now and has been seized on by Far-Right Brexiters like Daniel Hannam and Jacob Rees Mogg (whose business is based there presumably because it gets a 0% tax rate) as a model for Britain to follow.


Kenneth Jeyaretnam

* The author blogs at https://kenjeyaretnam.com/.




9 Responses to “What Foreign Pundits Really Mean When They Say Singapore Is ‘Small Government’”

  • Straight "As" Marlboro Tan:

    We have been preparing for this since SARS,” said Mr Lee, who was speaking at the sidelines of the World Economic Forum annual meeting in Davos, Switzerland.

    “After SARS, we made a thorough review of what of the facilities we had – the infrastructure, hospitals, isolation wards, and the scientific testing and capabilities,” said Mr Lee.

    “I think we are much better prepared now[/B],” Mr Lee said, also highlighting the new National Centre for Infectious Diseases, which opened in late 2018

    7 MARCH

    A 77-year-old Singaporean man, who shared a ward with another patient who later tested positive for Covid-19, was reported to have contracted the virus.

    The Ministry of Health (MOH) said yesterday that the man, [B]Case 126, had been in the same ward as Case 109 in Singapore General Hospital (SGH) last Saturday and Sunday


    On 10 Mar,

    case 192, a 32-year-old male American national had arrived in Singapore from the U.S.
    On the same day, he had gone to Hero’s bar.

    He then reported onset of symptoms on Mar. 11 and was subsequently confirmed to have Covid-19 infection on the morning of Mar. 13.
    He is currently warded at NCID.

    A few days later on 14 Mar , cases 556, 657, 670 and 813 had gone to the same bar.
    They reported onset of symptoms between Mar. 17 to 23.


    1 April

    COVID-19: S’pore hits 1,000 mark

    the result speaks for itself…

    GD Star Rating
    a WordPress rating system
  • Nk:

    Sars.is not covid 19.19 is stealth.

    GD Star Rating
    a WordPress rating system
  • Great Asia:

    Taiwan is efficient?!!!

    How many people go to Taiwan?

    The ONE million Taiwanese staying in China didn’t even rush back to the backward island when the virus was spreading inside China.

    This shallow monkey failed to mention Malaysia, our neighbour is also doing very well.

    This man is far from his father.

    Ha ha ha!

    GD Star Rating
    a WordPress rating system
  • Wuhan virus 1,000 mark:

    macau is doing well in control of virus.

    so also Taiwan.

    pap Singapore after such a long time Orange, still has rising numbers, now reaching 1,000.

    and these pap folks are paid S$m, ownself pay ownself type of course.

    normally, those paid S$m anywhere in the world must perform otherwise are culled. but pap type non performing yet remain in S$m roles.



    plus ownself pay ownself justification = disaster in the making, as the 1,000 now shows.

    GD Star Rating
    a WordPress rating system
  • oxygen:

    PAPpypolitics/PAPpynomics told peasants that LEE-jiapore’s supplementary budget to fight the coronavirus is $48 billion.

    Of this amount, $17 billion will come from past reserves, WHERE IS THE OTHER $31 billion MYSTERIOUSLY COME FROM? This money does not exist a month earlier in HSK’s February national budget statement to PARLY!!

    Money fall from the sky?

    GD Star Rating
    a WordPress rating system
  • Be effective:

    What kind of government not that critical now.
    More important is to have an effective Government that can take good control of the Covid-19 Pandemic situation and save lives.
    Need to do more now that we have community spread and 1000 cases !

    GD Star Rating
    a WordPress rating system
  • Sinchiapor Incorporated & Sons:

    Indeed, this Adrian Woodbridge is delusional; it’s probable he’s one of those political journalists who benefits from his affiliation with the world’s most successful crony-capitalist (pappy) parliamentarians. Adrian’s got the bad bug…. it thrives in dirt-rich conditions.

    GD Star Rating
    a WordPress rating system
  • Another Cok Talker:

    Great Asia:
    Taiwan is efficient?!!!

    How many people go to Taiwan?

    The ONE million Taiwanese staying in China didn’t even rush back to the backward island when the virus was spreading inside China.

    This shallow monkey failed to mention Malaysia, our neighbour is also doing very well.

    This man is far from his father.

    Ha ha ha!

    Obviously knows very little about Taiwan.

    GD Star Rating
    a WordPress rating system
  • Feeling Rich:

    KJ knows very well the truth behind the flatter.

    GD Star Rating
    a WordPress rating system
Member Services
Self-SupportMembers LoginSelf-Support
Sponsored Advertisement
Search On TR Emeritus
Sponsored Advertisement
Most Recent Comments
  • TRE Techie: IMHO, as long as there are plenty of 2Gs that are still alive, I don’t think there will be much...
  • TUMASIK Patriot: Mandy, I empathize with you and your concern, but sadly that is NOT what the majority with mostly if...
  • WP please read: WP, the responsibility has been thrust on your lap. You have become the Shadow Prime Minister and the...
  • Billy ma: PAP candidates are in it for their own personal career advancement as their main & only goal. Serving...
  • Light Shines in Sengkang: Based on events over the last 10 years, one might readily agree with TKL that the future is...
  • Agriculture or UglyCulture: A good municipal governance should: Focus on Urban Agriculture for the nation’s...
  • East Coast, East Coast,.....: TGH: 53% votes and Heng was not even facing the WP A team? the signal is strong and...
  • Sg is doomed with 4Gs: The days of a dominant over-bearing one-party government are as good as over. Pappy are losing...
  • Respect Opposition MPs: If SG is to be a democracy built on “justice and equality” then all...
  • Sojoürner: - Cont’d In reality PAP never had shareholder democracy, but management autocracy. A round robin of...
  • Harder Truths: As more unhappiness comes out the more draconian the laws will become. People will have ot decide...
  • Harder Truths: The use of public funds in pappy constituencies is 99% not for the people – it is to pay the...
Visitors Statistic
Latest Statistic