SDP: POFMA from MND

The SDP confirms that we have received a Correction Direction under POFMA. We have complied with the order by placing the Correction Notice as specified by MND. However, the conclusions that the alternate authority at the Ministry of National Development arrived at are disputable. Under POFMA, we have to comply with the order but we will be applying to cancel the Correction Directions.

The quote was taken verbatim from the article that was published in the Straits Times on April 20, 2018. “Even if the increase that Dr Cheong proposed was in terms of ‘liveable density’ instead of population density, this would imply that the total population was planned to go from 5.7 million (11,000 per “liveable” sq km implying a liveable area of 518 sq km) to 6.97 million (13,700 per sq km with no increase in liveable area) in 2030. This is slightly more than the 6.9 million population figure that Dr Vivian Balakrishnan tried to disavow during the televised debate. While we appreciated the PAP’s admission during the debate that they were not planning on 10 million or even 6.9 million as a target for the population in the next decade, this latest action by the alternate authority from the MND seems to contradict Dr Balakrishnan’s statement by implying that the government had planned for a target of 6.97 million which is slightly higher than 6.9 million. While we do not want to quibble over these details in the middle of a critical election campaign in the middle of a pandemic, it would be good to have clarity on this matter as it seems to have become an issue for the PAP.

 

Singapore Democratic Party

 

 

yyy
SPONSORED ADVERTISEMENT
Loading...

16 Responses to “SDP: POFMA from MND”

  • And only this morning I was just praising our civil servants competent and ability to run a country even in the absence of ministers. I guess I was wrong.

    Apparently permsecs just handed power and gun, so die die have to fire one or two rounds testing testing else after 10th July no more biting power liao. lol

    GD Star Rating
    a WordPress rating system
  • Soccerbetting2:

    Bukit Batok should vote Dr Chee Soon Juan into Parliament to challenge the 10 millions population or not even 6.9 million population issue. Don’t forget the CPF also has a lot of questions that need Dr Chee Soon Juan to ask. So what about the total size of reserves and how is the almost $100 billions being spent on exactly. And there are a whole tons of questions that need Dr Chee to ask. Bukit Batok residents may also get savings from Dr Chee if he is elected MP. Dr Chee says he is working full time MP and not part time MP if elected. And Dr Chee kick out managing agent concept. And when one look at the comments of all those new woman candidate and their plan is always to create a new fund to help the poor! Nothing creative. And all those funds will have a lot donations from those beast women wing that siphon off public funds in a round about ways. And one will always hear a lot of saying like non profit organisation, or zero waste to help the poor. People should check out the salaries of all those women ceo or women chairman of such “non profit organisations”. Who know whether those beast women pay themselves millions of salary obtained from the donations received and that will left little to help the “poor”. Beware of those conwomen in charge of managing such public donated funds!

    GD Star Rating
    a WordPress rating system
  • Asd:

    I think it is not right because no pofma mango sago about prime minister falsehood made online

    GD Star Rating
    a WordPress rating system
  • Be fair:

    Asd:
    I think it is not right because no pofma mango sago about prime minister falsehood made online

    If no pofma, then what’s said by former millister loud and clear in public is not false!

    GD Star Rating
    a WordPress rating system
  • Hu Chian:

    Quote,
    “This is how censorship takes place in Western societies: the appearance of freedom and individual liberty must be maintained. But at the same time, the rabble needs to be kept in line, which is becoming harder as traditional media lose its grip on world audiences.

    Whether it comes from dictatorships, authoritarian states or a mixture of corporate giants with the political and intelligence establishment, the stench of censorship is identical. Whether it comes in the form of stopping “Fake News” or as violent, old fashion state repression, those who value truth and intellectual freedom must see beyond the not so subtle message:

    We will tell you what to think… and of course:

    Before starting a chronological review of events leading to recent surge of internet censorship, let’s put everything in its right place:

    “The only legitimate role of search engines is to provide relevant search results, to facilitate public access to information. The only legitimate role of social media platforms is to facilitate public access to communications. Content carriers have no legal nor moral authority to be self-appointed censors, nor to be self-proclaimed arbiters of Fact or Truth.” 1

    In the Beginning, there was no “Fake News”

    Fake news are obviously as old as news themselves, but the term became widely used during the 2016 U.S. presidential campaign, and even more after Trump became President and started to use it almost on a daily basis.
    Although its exact origin –as in who or what medium used it first to sound the alarm during 2016- is hard to point out, we can verify that by the end of March 2016 -here is a customized Google News search- there were only a few mentions on fake news, referring to them mostly as outlandish anecdotes like the alleged case of a woman growing potatoes in her vagina, the first head transplant, or pregnancy by flu vaccine, etc. 1″

    Site,
    Seemorerocks: The crackdown on free speech on the internet
    https://robinwestenra.blogspot.com/2019/02/the-crackdown-on-free-speech-on-internet.html
    https://www.oftwominds.com/blogfeb20/lies-videos2-20.html
    https://www.oftwominds.com/blogjune20/data-religion6-20.html

    The Illusion of Control: What If Nobody’s … – oftwominds.com
    https://www.oftwominds.com/blogjune20/in-charge6-20.html
    https://www.oftwominds.com/blogmar17/unaffordable3-17.html
    https://oftwominds.com/blogfeb20/unstoppable2-20.html

    How We Got Here: the Global Economy’s 75-Year Stumble to the Precipice
    http://charleshughsmith.blogspot.com/2020/07/how-we-got-here-global-economys-75-year.html
    https://www.lewrockwell.com/2019/09/david-stockman/david-stockman-on-the-coming-financial-panic-and-the-2020-election/

    GD Star Rating
    a WordPress rating system
  • oxygen:

    COME ON, PAPpypolitics, where is your grip of truth in this POFMA abuse again?

    The Population White Paper, I recall has an anchor reach of 6.5 million to 6.9 million.

    Let me try to demonstrate some simple projection -basing on current statistics

    a) live birth rate 40,000 or thereabout
    b) 25,000 new citizens
    c) 30,000 new Permanent residents in employment

    New citizens can or may have spouse or kid who may have or seek or not seeking citizenship status, so 25K new citizen can translate to 50K new residents actually in physical residency in Lee-jiapore.

    The same for new Permanent residents – they have spouses or partners, maybe with kids too but on temporary residency status. The aggregate population addition in physical residency is another 60,000 conservatively estimated.

    You add 50,000 (from new citizens category) plus 60,000 (PR category additions) and 40,000 live birth, WE ARE TALKING ABOUT AN ADDITIONAL POPULATION GROWTH OF 150,000.

    THAT IS SLIGHTLY MORE THAN 2% BASING ON THE ASSUMPTION OF 6.9 million presumably reached by 2030.

    AND I HAVE NOT COUNT IN THOSE ON EMPLOYMENT PASS AND JUST WORK PERMIT NUMBERS.

    We only SLIGHTLY UNDER 2% population growth over 20 years to reach 10 million population by 2050.

    IS THIS SIMPLE COMPOUNDING GROWTH beyond the comprehension of PAPpypolitics “floating balloon” trickery of lurking mentality and lying and relying on POFMA PIMP to stop opposition politics from asking full and frank questions??

    GD Star Rating
    a WordPress rating system
  • REGIME CHANGE is the solution:

    Straits Times: Singapore GE2020: PSP’s Tan Cheng Bock proposes televised Covid-19 debate with Chan Chun Sing

    CCS said to focus on COVID-19 pandemic. TCB agreed and want to debate him on the issue. The ball is on CCS’ court. Does he have the balls to debate? Let us see.

    GD Star Rating
    a WordPress rating system
  • Do not vote for:

    Soccerbetting2:
    Bukit Batok should vote Dr Chee Soon Juan into Parliament to challenge the 10 millions population or not even 6.9 million population issue. Don’t forget the CPF also has a lot of questions that need Dr Chee Soon Juan to ask. So what about the total size of reserves and how is the almost $100 billions being spent on exactly. And there are a whole tons of questions that need Dr Chee to ask. Bukit Batok residents may also get savings from Dr Chee if he is elected MP. Dr Chee says he is working full time MP and not part time MP if elected. And Dr Chee kick out managing agent concept. And when one look at the comments of all those new woman candidate and their plan is always to create a new fund to help the poor! Nothing creative. And all those funds will have a lot donations from those beast women wing that siphon off public funds in a round about ways. And one will always hear a lot of saying like non profit organisation, or zero waste to help the poor. People should check out the salaries of all those women ceo or women chairman of such “non profit organisations”. Who know whether those beast women pay themselves millions of salary obtained from the donations received and that will left little to help the “poor”. Beware of those conwomen in charge of managing such public donated funds!

    PAP Murali Pillai

    GD Star Rating
    a WordPress rating system
  • Do NOT vote for Murali Pillai:

    Soccerbetting2:
    Bukit Batok should vote Dr Chee Soon Juan into Parliament to challenge the 10 millions population or not even 6.9 million population issue. Don’t forget the CPF also has a lot of questions that need Dr Chee Soon Juan to ask. So what about the total size of reserves and how is the almost $100 billions being spent on exactly. And there are a whole tons of questions that need Dr Chee to ask. Bukit Batok residents may also get savings from Dr Chee if he is elected MP. Dr Chee says he is working full time MP and not part time MP if elected. And Dr Chee kick out managing agent concept. And when one look at the comments of all those new woman candidate and their plan is always to create a new fund to help the poor! Nothing creative. And all those funds will have a lot donations from those beast women wing that siphon off public funds in a round about ways. And one will always hear a lot of saying like non profit organisation, or zero waste to help the poor. People should check out the salaries of all those women ceo or women chairman of such “non profit organisations”. Who know whether those beast women pay themselves millions of salary obtained from the donations received and that will left little to help the “poor”. Beware of those conwomen in charge of managing such public donated funds!

    Dr Chee’s opponent at Bukit Batok SMC is Murali Pillai. Bukit Batok residents should NOT vote for him for a very good reason. Mr Pillai has/had family problems. If he cannot properly look after his family he has not business running the SMC affairs.

    GD Star Rating
    a WordPress rating system
  • The way I see it, another POFMA CD may be coming SDP’s way lor, Liz time for Dr Paul Tambyah, since Lawrence Wong has accused Paul of making “baseless and false” accusations against MOM.

    I am certain the permsec manning MOM now sure can get the hint (wink wink) from Lawrence Wong one, did bo?

    What do you think?

    GD Star Rating
    a WordPress rating system
  • All in it:

    Someone summarized Lawless response:
    Don’t just blame MOM. That is not true. We were all in it together.

    TRE Techie:
    The way I see it, another POFMA CD may be coming SDP’s way lor, Liz time for Dr Paul Tambyah, since Lawrence Wong has accused Paul of making “baseless and false” accusations against MOM.

    I am certain the permsec manning MOM now sure can get the hint (wink wink) from Lawrence Wong one, did bo?

    What do you think?

    GD Star Rating
    a WordPress rating system
  • Walao eh

    MOM permsec work till wee hours one so ONz one, so fast get the * wink * wink * from Lawrence and issued a total of 5 POFMA CDs wor, even kaki lang CNA also kenna.

    Anyhow guess Dr Paul from SDP sure kenna, really kenna wor. I so zoon one, I think must buy 4D liao, hm… buy what number lay?

    Issit got internal Memo side bet which permsec can issue the most POFMA CDs against oppose during GE got super bonus take issit?

    3 more days to go (Cooling off and polling day cannot post), now the list is topped by Aubeck Kam, permsec for MOM. The rest of the permsecs all sleeping meh? Quick quick, still got time!

    Wonder who from oppose will be targetted next, Nicole Seah or Dr Tan or Sylvia Lim or Pritam Singh?

    What say we all?

    .

    GD Star Rating
    a WordPress rating system
  • Puppet Show:

    Confirmed puppet show.
    Pull one string, chut one pattern.

    Don’t know why Singaporeans can stand this kind of nonsense.

    Apparently, many even love this kind of nonsense.

    Need a tsunami of votes to wash away all the dirt.

    TRE Techie:
    Walao eh

    MOM permsec work till wee hours one, so fast get the * wink * wink * from Lawrence liao and issued a total of 5 POFMA CDs wor.

    I so sibei zoon one, I think must buy 4D liao, hm… buy what number lay?

    GD Star Rating
    a WordPress rating system
  • Soccerbetting2:

    22nd June 2020 -218 (MOH. gov. sg data)
    23rd June 2020 -119(Todayonline/Moh data)
    24th June 2020 -191(moh data)
    25th June 2020 -113(moh data)
    26th June 2020 -219(Moh data)
    27th June 2020 -291(Moh data)
    28th June 2020-213(Moh data)
    29th June 2020 – 202 (Moh data)
    30th June 2020-246 (Moh data)
    1st July 2020 – 215(Straits Times data)
    2nd July 2020 – 188(Straits Times data)
    3rd July 2020 – 169(Straits Times data)
    4th July 2020 – 185(StraitsTimes data)
    5th July 2020 – 136(Straits Times data)

    Response : PAP is going to win again this General Election. So new corona virus must be pretty low before GE. Will it reach double digit mean less than 100 cases before 10th July 2020?After GE, the new cases may have spike again?

    GD Star Rating
    a WordPress rating system
  • George:

    Tin Pei Ling and Tan Chuan Jin are part of a political party that must be put out, Singaporeans must vote them out !

    VOTE PAP OUT ! !

    VOTE FOR CHANGE, VOTE OPPOSITION ! ! !

    GD Star Rating
    a WordPress rating system
  • Don`t Play Play:

    Don’t you Dare try to interpret or paraphrase mine bible (proposal, white paper or plan). If you interpret or paraphrase NOT to my liking. I (god) will Deny it and POFMA you ok. Don`t play, play with my mini Kingdom OK

    GD Star Rating
    a WordPress rating system
Member Services
Self-SupportMembers LoginSelf-Support
Sponsored Advertisement
Search On TR Emeritus
Sponsored Advertisement
Announcement
Advertisements
Visitors Statistic
Latest Statistic
Advertisement

UA-67043412-1