include("cmp.php");

Everything also you say one

I refer to this article by ST.

Quote:

He added that he had also republished his ministerial statements outside Parliament, thereby waiving his parliamentary privilege. This would allow his siblings to sue him over the statements, but they have not done so, he pointed out.

Huh?! Simi lanjiao?! If you got a problem with what they said, then you should sue them! Not give this kind of lame excuse, saying they never sue you back means you must be correct!

Wah lao eh! This kind of kukujiao reason also can give! Win liao lor! Everything also you say one! Champion siah!

Orh! When you don’t sue them, it’s because it will further besmirch your parents’ names! But if they never sue you back, it’s because they are bloody cowards! Right? Everything also you correct one!

Person A do something. Person B also do the same thing. Person C also do the same bloody thing! But he don’t go after person A and B, he only go after C! Why? Because he is not obligated to sue everyone!

No need for fair and equal treatment! Can suka suka target one! Wah, so good siah!

 

Angry Citizen

 

 

yyy
SPONSORED ADVERTISEMENT
Loading...

33 Responses to “Everything also you say one”

  • Ah… the writer is misinformed again.

    Under teh law, in a civil suit, the plaintiff is entitled to choose who he wants to sue in any case, not just in defamation.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • KKJ:

    Kukujiaos are a great invention. Please don’t insult them.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Angry Citizen:

    @Techie

    I get it, you are not the first person to mention that.

    Of course he has the right to suka suka target sue. The question is, should he? He is the PM for F sakes, not some rich random AMDK.

    Person A, B, C, all do the same thing. You are head of the country, yet you suka suka choose selective action? Then say you are not obligated to sue everyone?

    FUCK YOU LAH! RESIGN LOR! THEN PUBLIC NO NEED TO JUDGE YOU ON YOUR SUKA SUKA ACTION!

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Angry Citizen:

    Sorry, but I don’t understand what you mean by misinformed again?

    If you are talking about the Jolovan Wham discussion, I am very certain that REFUSAL to sign any kind of document (including police statement) is a basic human right.

    Also as I mentioned, to my knowledge, only ONE COUNTRY in the world criminalizes you for not signing a police statement. You find me one other country in the world that does this (other than North Korea), I will eat my words.

    Buddy. We can’t just, in the name of securing more convictions, throw all human rights out the window, you understand what I am saying?

    At the very least, you gotta give me a reason why you personally think that someone refusing to sign a statement, is itself a crime?

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • @Angry Citizen

    I perfectly understand what you are saying, BUT the current gahment says “refusing to sign is an offence”, so until teh day a new gahment is elected, you can throw whatever “basic human right” out of teh window if you want to stay out of trouble.

    There is a saying “do like the Romans do” and if you wish to remain in Sinkieland, then you should respect and abide by whatever laws (rubbish or not) that are currently in place.

    As for him suing, I agree that he should not have sued, but he was well within his rights to do so, what can you say? One kind of rice feed hundreds of kind of humans, heard of it?

    Anyway, whether I agree with you or not is irrelevant and of little or no consequences.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Angry Citizen:

    @Techie

    I am not suggesting we should go and break the law. But if everything, just follow gahmen, do what they say, then what is the point of a discussion?

    If we see something wrong, we must voice out! Don’t you agree? I mean, what is the point of websites like TRE and TOC?

    If everything we just follow lor, dun like then migrate, then what’s the point of all this?

    We see something then diam diam, then expect what change? Expect improvements to drop from the sky lor!

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • TumasikPatriot:

    @TRE tech-Angry Citizen…

    Both you gentlemen are right in your thoughts and comment…may I add my 1ct worth???

    An idiot “born” and groom to rule is unlike ones who step up to rule through achievement in Life…

    COMPARE: Dr. Chee and Paul Thambaya…achieved academic excellence through self-dedication and willingly sacrifice their comfort to step up and offer their services…and yet an “Idiot rules the roost” and the Deserving left at the wayside

    IN THE PAST: Willingly…the ordinary Patriots step up to Built a Nation without Grooming, just pure Dedication and we HAD a Nation

    TODAY: with all the grooming and what have you, we have a SinCity Inc, not a Country “The Republic of Singapore” built on the Sweat,Blood & Tears of our forefathers…

    Where does the Fault lie???…The Lies that rule the Roost with Idiots talking Cock most of the TIME!!! and the silly sheeple thinking that a POT of Gold is waiting if you go into a Rainbow…TRUE for a few and FAKE for the many CONditioned who have their feet in a POT of SHIT and Head above the Clouds

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Realistically:

    @ Angry Citizen

    Aiyah, KPKB again ar………what u think can achieve leh?
    Chabot (run away) from this link:

    https://www.tremeritus.net/2020/11/27/refusing-to-sign-a-document-is-a-basic-human-right-2/

    Per the ST report which u provided the link Lim Tean could have tarok the emperor without clothes over the PM’s reply that not suing his siblings did not mean pple could repeat what he claimed to be defamatory publications against him lah…….

    Like I said, sinkies can wallow in their rant and self-pity and selfish interests while day by day, SINKaPOOR slides down the path of economic developments due to failed policies and the stupidity of the emperor without clothes.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Realistically:

    @ TRE Techie:
    December 17, 2020 at 6:29 am (Quote)

    >>Under teh law, in a civil suit, the plaintiff is entitled to choose who he wants to sue in any case, not just in defamation<<

    Not that I disagree with U………there is another angle which Lim Tean could have used based on STATED policy of the emperor without clothes……..

    But then pple like Terry Xu, Leong Sze Hian think they can prevail in the SINKaPOOR courts………think U need more confirmation than what Justice Chan Seng Onn had said in his judgment on the Liyani's case?

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • What is fairness?:

    So what is fairness? Does it mean in law, it can be unfair?
    Why is a balance used to demonstrate justice?

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • opposition dude:

    His siblings aren’t stupid, they know there is no way they can win when he is PM. He should be far more concerned about the growing number of opposition MPs in parliament though, continue sleeping and watch that number grow in future.

    And his appointed successor scored 53% of the votes so he has to either think hard to make sure said successor doesn’t get voted out again (if he stays there that is) or come out with another successor.

    I wouldn’t worry too much though as he has shown he doesn’t know how to get things done. When he announced the election in a hurry he was slammed hard for being opportunistic and he paid for it dearly with a drop in vote share and another GRC lost, total opposite of what he wanted (strong strong mandate in case you have forgotten AHEM!).

    So let’s seee if he is still PM come the next election. If not we will have loads of fun slamming his successor for not being ready ha ha ha!

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • @ Angry Citizen

    Yes yes, I agree.

    Discuss and share our thoughts can, break the law cannot afford to. lol

    @ Realistically

    The possibility of the duo winning the case is 0.01%, although I would really like to see them win and prove me wrong. So sad.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Angry Citizen:

    @Realistically

    I’m very curious.

    According to you, making our viewpoints heard is just simply cow bear cow bull ranting with no tangible outcome.

    And also according to you, Terry Xu and Leong Sze are just fighting losing battles.

    So now I’m very curious. What in your eyes, would be the correct course of action?

    Do tell! I want to know what is the miracle tactic that Lim Tean should have used that will guarantee him a victory over pinkie!

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Realistically:

    >>And also according to you, Terry Xu and Leong Sze are just fighting losing battles.<>So now I’m very curious. What in your eyes, would be the correct course of action?<>Do tell! I want to know what is the miracle tactic that Lim Tean should have used that will guarantee him a victory over pinkie!<<

    Aiyah, I not tok about "miracles" lah…….just hantum them properly ……like the wayang-party must do its basic duties and discharge its responsibilities of calling out the FARCE in Parliament & oso BAD laws like pofma, AJA etc……….like calling out the Shanmugam FARCE pertaining to the Liyani's case……….judgments seemingly not about doing justice………write to SCMP & New York Times about the bull shit propaganda regarding justice ……er more like the travesties of justice……but then I am wasting time & energy engaging wayang-party groupies like u believing more in their s*ake oil salesmanship than discharging their duties and responsibilities as MPs………….no shame for collecting their monthly MP allowance for their wayang………like getting NEA to get rid of midges after collecting millions of tax-payers $ over 18 years by Low Thia Khiang.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • @Angry Citizen

    Like one of our editors say, there’s no point cry mother cry father at all because the party NEVER listens. Just STFU and remember to tick on the right box cum next GE.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Angry citizen:

    >>”just hantum them properly ……like the wayang-party must do its basic duties and discharge its responsibilities of calling out the FARCE in Parliament & oso BAD laws like pofma, AJA etc……….”

    Oh wow. In the last 10 years, no one has ever thought of doing that, right?

    >>”like calling out the Shanmugam FARCE pertaining to the Liyani’s case……”

    Do you even watch the news? THEY TRIED! Why dont you go see how Shanmugam responded?

    I read what you wrote. Now I’m very certain you think you are the only person in the damn world who knows how to do things.

    You’re basically just saying, oppo must do the right things, do their job, call out on pap bullshit, and everything will be just fine.

    And you somehow believe that in all these years, no one has tried doing that.

    Gee. Do the right thing. No one’s ever thought of that before.

    Facepalm

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • The emperor th small man .....:

    “There is no greater delight than to be conscious of sincerity on examining oneself… He who attends to his greater self becomes a great man, and he who attends to his smaller self becomes a small man.”

    - Mencius the Sage

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Realistically:

    @ Angry citizen:
    December 18, 2020 at 12:09 am

    >>THEY TRIED! Why dont you go see how Shanmugam responded?<<

    Dun tok cok about the wayang party "TRIED" lah. I got watch sylvia Lim's speech & that of He Ting Ru lah.

    Like I said Shanmugam's Parliament Statement was a FARCE…….which the wayang party MPs who are lawyers DARE NOT call out, especially so when the High Court AND the CJ had criticised the 2 DPPs……….whereas Shan ONLY said Police understaff…..

    As for me, pple can judge for themselves who has contributed most on TRE……surely not the wayang-party snakeoil groupies like u nor ANYONE else from the wayang-party nor ANY party.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Soccerbetting2:

    Stated above :Quote -”….Huh?! Simi lanjiao?! If you got a problem with what they said, then you should sue them! Not give this kind of lame excuse, saying they never sue you back means you must be correct!

    Wah lao eh! This kind of kukujiao reason also can give! Win liao lor! Everything also you say one! Champion siah!

    Orh! When you don’t sue them, it’s because it will further besmirch your parents’ names! But if they never sue you back, it’s because they are bloody cowards! Right? Everything also you correct one!

    Person A do something. Person B also do the same thing. Person C also do the same bloody thing! But he don’t go after person A and B, he only go after C! Why? Because he is not obligated to sue everyone!

    No need for fair and equal treatment! Can suka suka target one! Wah, so good siah!

    Angry Citizen”Unquote .

    Response : In such a case to involve the originator Person A,sharing post person B and C,then it is only proper that the originator must be sued before person B or C can be sued .This is because Person A is the originator .Law should not be messy to allow LHL to suka suka sue person B or C without suing the originator A first if originator A is known ! If originator A is not sued ,then LHL has no right to sue person C .

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Angry Citizen:

    Realistically:
    As for me, pple can judge for themselves who has contributed most on TRE……surely not the wayang-party snakeoil groupies like u nor ANYONE else from the wayang-party nor ANY party.

    HUH?!?!?! WTF???!!!!

    You literally say you expect ppl from WP to contribute to TRE??!?!?!

    Wah! Big fiack siah!

    All these opposition sucks becuz they never contribute to TRE!!! THE SCUM!

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • oxygen:

    @ What is fairness?

    TO AVOID DOUBT, just ask Parti Liyani!

    What is fairness?: So what is fairness? Does it mean in law, it can be unfair?
    Why is a balance used to demonstrate justice?

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Realistically:

    I thought sinkies might like to see further evidence of the FAILURES and wayang of the wayang-party MPs who have failed in their duties and responsibilities as MPs, but still have NO SHAME to collect their $16k monthly MP allowance as shown in the TOC thread which is about 27 NGOs petitioning for the establishment of a Commission of Inquiry into the (in)justice system in Singapore::

    https://www.onlinecitizenasia.com/2020/12/18/27-civil-society-organisations-jointly-urge-president-halimah-yacob-to-convene-coi-to-review-singapores-justice-system-in-open-letter/

    “27 civil society organisations jointly urge President Halimah Yacob to convene COI to review Singapore’s justice system in open letter”

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • xoxo:

    The PEOple cannot be right but PAPple are always right even when they are obviously wrong.

    PEOple cannot criticise the PAPple but PAPple can ANY OLD HOW SCREW the PEOple.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • @Angry Citizen

    You have made your point and there are obviously merits in your argument, but the law is the law so what can we do, right?

    It is pointless to continue to cry father cry mother over something which cannot be changed, and maybe get oneself into trouble.

    If many feel strongly against the current situation, then they should remember to tick in the right box come next GE.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Realistically:

    @ TRE Techie:
    December 19, 2020 at 5:08 am (Quote)

    “You have made your point and there are obviously merits in your argument, but the law is the law so what can we do, right?”

    What “point” has this low life troll, who I believe is a wayang-party IB made, and how has he or anyone justify the dereliction of duties and responsibilities of the wayang-party MPs?

    I suggest readers might want to follow the comments in the TOC I have posted above regarding the letter by 27 NGOs calling on the President to call for a COI.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Realistically:

    By the way, sinkies should not expect any change without their making their collective voices heard……….you can each of us write to your MPs expressing your outrage at the FAILURES of Govt policies including what was prima facie a travesty of justice in the Parti Liyani’s case…………rather than sneering at the NGOs for their effort to right the wrong and be a free-loader.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Realistically:

    By the way if you don’t have the balls or courage to do your part, then stop sneering at people like the 27 NGOs from their efforts to better sinkies’ lives………..rather than wait another 4-5 years to act at the next GE…………..there are severe implications regarding the wait for 4-5 years…which unfortunately most sinkies failed to realise.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • oxygen:

    OTHERWISE AN INTERESTING THREAD that could lead to informing discourse in matters of law but unfortunately interjected by “rodent”infestation.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Angry Citizen:

    Realistically logic =
    27 ngo spoke to President. Therefore this proves beyond reasonable doubt that WP sucks. I will also conviently ignore the fact that pap cabinet is paid obscene million dollar salary while talking about WP salary.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Angry Citizen:

    @techie

    I know, you kinda said that twice now. I didn’t pay attention becuz, cmon, you seriosly think I’m stupid enough to vote for evil to poke my ass?

    Some people however, will vote for pappy just cos they hate wp.

    Not gonna mention names.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • @Angry Citizen

    No, I don’t think you were stupid to have voted for the lesser evil.

    Simply put, your choices were limited.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Hawking Eye:

    I am not sure if refusing to sign one’s own statement is an offence. Just make a note thereon that the witness/accused refused to sign it. I think such an unsigned statement will equally be valid unless the person contests it, which will be different matter altogether.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Impossible no cronyism:

    Does anyone believe in this world there can be no cronyism?

    If the answer is no, what does this suggest the possibility of zero corruption in this world?

    Can a leader ever never abuse his powers?

    If your answer is not possible, then how can Democracy ever be possible ?

    The only politically correct
    answer is to say only singapore is a true democracy because leeder never abuse his power nor ever will he.

    Loosely speaking , for ease of communication , my point is, once you masturbated fpr the first time enjoying the ecstacy, will you never do it again? Or once you tried sex for first time, will you stop asking for more? Is there a limit?

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
Member Services
Self-SupportMembers LoginSelf-Support
Sponsored Advertisement
Search On TR Emeritus
Sponsored Advertisement
Announcement
Advertisement
Visitors Statistic
Latest Statistic

UA-67043412-1