Politicians should take the lead and stop giving lip service

The Straits Times article  “CECA is not a four-letter word” (18 Jul 2021) by Senior Political Correspondent Ms Grace Ho is a great display of allegiance to the government’s standard narrative on the wonders of FTAs in expanding Singapore’s economic space and creating good jobs for Singaporeans.

Her article wasn’t much different from previous ST articles by ST writer Ravi Velloor, renowned academics, Kishore Mahbubani and Prof Tommy Koh. Tommy Koh even applauded CECA for bringing many benefits to Singapore and India as “India is a talent surplus country and Singapore is a talent deficit country.”

I believe this is how the government aims to condition the Singaporean mindset to accept FTAs and CECA for our own good. Hence, Grace Ho’s caution: “Amid Singapore’s increasingly complex challenges, the last thing it needs is the non-constructive circularity in the trade pacts’ debate.”

It is not surprising that her article adds no value to the national debate on FTAs and CECA. If this is the way that the government wants the public media or MSM to present such a perspective, she should be mentally prepared that CECA will become a Dirty word.

While she tried to salvage the two ministerial statements made by Health Minister Ong Ye Kung and Manpower Minister Tan See Leng in Parliament on Jul 6, as they had provided useful facts and “an accurate steer on how CECA works,” and chastised PSP for refusing to withdraw statements like CECA allows for unfettered inflow of Indian professionals (which NCMP Leong Mun Wai had strongly rejected), she didn’t have the journalistic courage to seek answers to questions that Singaporeans wanted to know.

What then is the value of a national daily if it merely repeats a government statement without attempting to present a better quality picture to clear the doubts and confusions in the minds of Singaporeans? ST is functioning like any government agency.

She traced Singapore’s early manpower drives to attract skilled labour in the 1980s to the Professionals Information and Placement Service, the Committee on Attracting Talents to Singapore and an international manpower division created within the Manpower Ministry to oversee Contact Singapore offices in global cities to draw overseas talent in Singapore.
I lived through that early era when the talents were really qualified experts in specialized fields who came to help develop Singapore’s economy and trained our human resources.She reported without substantive numbers: “The efforts paid off. A 2016 study by two Institute of Policy Studies researchers said net migration numbers increased drastically in 2005 and peaked in 2008.
What does this mean? Was this the end of Phase 1 in recruitment of foreign talent to Singapore? Did Singapore’s foreign manpower policy deteriorate after Phase 1 with more import of cheap and less-skilled or qualified foreigners into our labour market?Equally puzzling was her statement: “The increase in percentage of non-resident population grew from 2004 and peaked in 2008”, and helped counter falling birth rates. Is Singapore’s declining TFR (Total Fertility Rate) a factor in determining the opening of a wider door for the inflow of foreigners besides those targeted as talents to build our economy?

In Minister Ong’s ministerial statement, he disclosed that from 2005 to 2020, the number of local PMETs (combination of Singaporeans and PRs) grew by more than 380,000 while the number of EPs (Employment Pass holders) increased from 65,000 in 2005 to 177,000 in 2020, an increase of 112,000 (or an annual growth rate of 7%.)

As there is no quota set for EPs, did MOM accept too many or too few EPs during the period mentioned? This can only be answered if the government is willing to share the number of Singaporeans who have been displaced by foreigners over the last 20 years.

SMU assistant professor of law Benjamin Joshua Ong “notes that while CECA does not oblige Singapore to grant employment passes to Indian nationals, some people disagree with the number of EPs Singapore has chosen to grant.”

In fact, the government’s assertion that “CECA does not affect Singapore’s ability to regulate immigration “is irrelevant because it is MOM which approves the EP application and ICA grants the approval to stay in Singapore. Who holds the control lever on EPs or opens the flood-gate?

Joshua Ong further pointed out that people may confuse “the decision to enter into CECA with the decision to grant EPs to Indian nationals.” CECA is a trade agreement which happens to have a clause, Chapter 9 on movement of natural persons” and the issue of EPs is a work pass application process.

Are all the 26 FTAs responsible for the huge import of foreigners or is CECA the main culprit because it was signed with India with a 1.3b population? Why can’t the government be transparent to clear the doubts and suspicions instead of throwing smoke-screens or accusing PSP of barking up the wrong tree?

In 2020, Singapore’s population stood at 5.69m, of which 3.52m were Singapore citizens. Foreigners made up 2.16m, comprising 0.52m PRs and 1.64m non-residents. It should be clear that competition for jobs from foreigners is intense in our labour market and not pretend that foreigners help create good jobs for Singaporeans.

Grace Ho highlighted an observation: “Before COVID-19, Indian nationals were already highly visible here due to their concentration in certain residential developments and sectors such as information technology and banking.”

When this visibility is matched by thousands of Singaporean PMETs losing their jobs to foreigners over the last 20 years, this unhappiness should have been acknowledged and acted upon long ago.
Even PM Lee now recognizes the problem:”Singaporeans are anxious about jobs, foreign competition, as well as the impact of the large number of foreigners working and living here. These are valid concerns which we will address.” (Straits Times, 8 Jul 2021).

Yet the two ministers in their ministerial statements, blamed PSP for stirring up emotions and linking CECA to racism and worsening the situation. Obviously, both ministers aren’t listening to the calls for help!

Based on an Institute of Policy Studies (IPS) of 2012 Singaporeans and PRs aged 21 and above, from Nov 2019 to Mar 2020, “more than half of Singapore’s residents are concerned about their job security, employment prospects and children’s future”.

This indicated some level of concern about the employment market and the government is not helping to clear the air by refusing to separate Singaporeans from PRs (who are foreigners) in the 380,000 Local PMEs category.

NTU assistant professor of sociology Laavanya Kathiravelu even suggested breaking down employment data by the percentage of foreigners in different industries, which would make clear what kinds of gaps they are filling in the economy. This is a sensible suggestion – how can well-educated Singaporean PMETs who have lost their jobs and livelihoods be expected to forever swallow their pride and take up gig jobs like Grab and PH car drivers and Panda Food riders to feed their families?

Unless MOM is willing to be transparent in data disclosure, no one knows precisely how many Singaporean PMETs have been displaced over the years. Instead of taking positive actions to address the concerns of Singaporeans over job security and discrimination in the employment market, it seems the government chose other paths.

In a virtual press conference by the Emerging Stronger Taskforce on May 17, DPM Heng Swee Keat tried to re-define Singaporean Core and said “ that test for us must be the commitment to the well-being of Singapore and of Singaporeans.”

This is a drastic difference from our home-grown definition of “Singapore Core” to mean a local born Singaporean. What is the government’s agenda in floating (like test balloons) such a definition of “Singaporean Core”? Will Singaporeans be overwhelmed by a growing foreign population as all foreigners can become “Singaporean Core” as long as they show commitment to Singapore and of Singaporeans by holding well-paid jobs?

An even bolder move was made by MAS managing director Ravi Menon in his lecture as ninth SR Nathan Fellow at the IPS in Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy on Jul22. It was an apt venue to propound his new policy idea – he proposed to professionalise all jobs and start by doing away with the professional, managerial, executive and technical (PMET) job category.

“If we can’t abolish it, then at least drop the “P” from the category: It suggests other jobs are not professionals. We should question the premise that all Singaporeans should aim to take up PMET jobs.” [In the ministerial statements in Parliament, the “T” was already dropped quietly to become PME.]

He added: “To be an inclusive society, we must value social and vocational skills as much as academic intelligence,” as skilled trades can provide a middle-class lifestyle as in European countries.
We can’t disagree with him except that over the last 20 years, most trade and vocational jobs have been taken up by foreigners who obtained S-Passes or Work Permits with low wages. In the PMET category, Singaporeans are also losing jobs there.

Where do we expect our young graduates from autonomous and private universities, polytechnics and ITEs go to for their future careers? What will be their future prospects? Will many of them be compelled to go into the gig industry for a living in the next decade?

While I support suitably trained Singaporeans to reclaim the trade and vocational jobs with a higher wage level, any further loss of PMET jobs could mean greater social inequality and a sharper economic divide amongst Singaporeans.

As it was, the IPS study in 2019-2020 showed 78.8% respondents (sample size 2012) rated themselves in the lower middle class, working class and lower class compared with 21.1% in upper and upper middle class.

It is crucial that the government start to take the concerns of Singaporean PMETs seriously and not allow Ravi Menon’s social engineering to hijack the CECA debate by abolishing the PMET category. If our young graduates cannot find permanent entry level jobs upon graduation (because of competition from foreigners,) how can Singapore’s human capital be developed?

The signs of young graduates having more difficulties in finding full-time permanent jobs are already showing (with the pandemic making it worse). This was seen in the employment surveys on 11,800 fresh graduates from full-time programmes at autonomous universities (AUs) and 2,500 graduates from Private Education Institutions (PEIs) in 2019-2020.

In 2020, it was reported for AUs that “Fewer new grads land full-time jobs; 1 in 5 in temporary employment or traineeships ”. (ST Feb20, 2021). 22.3% AU graduates found part-time or traineeships compared with 7% the year before. For PEI graduates, 49% found full-time permanent employment within six months of final examinations compared with 69.8% from the AUs. [ST reported a rosier picture of 2020 cohort of AU graduates employed within six months of final examinations: 93.6% compared with 90.7% in 2019 but this figure included graduates in full-time, part-time , temporary or free-lance work).

Often the employment statistics presented in the daily newspapers aren’t easy to comprehend, and deter readers from getting a clear picture of the employment and unemployment situation. If we take PM Lee’s caution seriously that putting the blame on CECA will not solve our problem but instead, make it worse, then the government and politicians should take the lead and stop giving lip service to a serious problem concerning Singaporean jobs and their livelihoods.

If government continue to promote their standard narrative about the wonders of FTAs and CECA, academics stick to the Establishment’s standpoint that Singapore will perish without FTAs and the MSM not having the journalistic courage to tell the true story of Singaporean PMETs who have lost their jobs and livelihoods, all these serve to indicate that the politicians aren’t really listening to the people’s concern.


Kok Ming Cheang




19 Responses to “Politicians should take the lead and stop giving lip service”

  • 4 letter:

    Ya,CECA is not a four letter word,it is a FARK LETTER WORD.
    It farks sgs upside down from being made jobless to CECA-DELTA mutants.

    GD Star Rating
  • Billy ma:

    PAP has established that making ‘ministerial statement’ in parliament, that statement henceforth becomes the law.
    And in some cases, such ministerial statements even become a judiciary verdict to clear the speakers of any wrongdoing.

    Is this how this country has become?

    Some latest laws to be passed, with zero obstruction, enable the ruling party to walk into anyone house without proper warrant & all is needed is for cookup excuses.

    Remember POFMA? How it was sold to be for the good of the nation but has proven to be nothing but a political tool.
    Singaporeans had been cheated time & again.

    If this is how this country is heading, Singaporeans better be concerned.

    GD Star Rating
  • Pap has the mandate:

    Let Singapore be overrun by Indians and then make Singapore another state of India. Good luck Stinkies, you voted for PAP, do not KPKB.

    GD Star Rating
  • You mati your problem:

    PAPolitics is a dirty world.

    GD Star Rating
  • Temusik Patriot:

    Everything about CECA boils down to a piece of wooden SHIT…one week visit to Swiss Alps with the cold wind freezing his BLAIN…he returns to declare Swiss standard by 2010…one visit to Bangalore India’s IT valley…and CECA was created in a mind that never deFROSTED from his visit to the Swiss Alps not even with the Heat of India

    GD Star Rating
  • Gerrard:

    At the end of the day, who to blame? Who gave them control over our lives?
    The core of true blue locally born will diminish to the extent of Extinct!

    GD Star Rating
  • One Nation Two Moralities:

    Just explain – and you can’t – how the world’s 4th most corrupted crony-capitalist regime could justify their stranglehold over the world’s 3rd most transparent society?

    Think in terms of: public fund management opacity, unilateral CPF tweaks & calibrations, absence of minimum and depressed median wages, wanton and secret GLC salaries, lack of checks and balances on the government, the executive branch’s warping of the judicial and legislative arms of governance.

    Siginna sheeple, do as you are told but don’t you ever question us here on top of the food chain….. it’s called social darwinism haven’t you heard?

    GD Star Rating
  • k:

    Singapore is the most transparent country in the world except:

    Cannot tell how much is the total actual income of politicians.

    Cannot know how much is the nation’s reserves.

    Cannot know how much the country’s two national funds have.

    How much are the top executives of the funds are paid.

    Statistics for citizens are lumped together with foreigners called locals or residents.

    GD Star Rating
  • AristoCATs - P R ?:

    Singapore is the most transparent country in the world except:

    Cannot tell how much is the total actual income of politicians.

    . . .

    Yeah, AristoCATs marketing PR talk –
    “We are transparent – except on info we deemed secret.”
    More than 39% should know the Power of the Ballot Box !

    GD Star Rating
  • Trojan horse:

    I read ravi menon speech with misgivings besides proposing changes to pmet concept ,he gently slides in min wage idea with some window dressing which the opposition has been proposing for yrs,I feel that our rulers are changing tack by using third party trojan horse,

    Dear fellow citizens beware we must not be social engineered,manipulated and a wool put over our eyes,think objectively and look Round with eyes open,
    I need not care I am a pioneer semi retired n not many yrs left but I worry for our future generations,my kids and their kids
    I thank God everyday for psp,wp ,courageous people like kenneth jeya, lim tean,tan cb ,chee sj and others,they put themselves on the line everyday to voice concerns of sporeans ,
    What for ?I ask myself an ungrateful 61 %

    GD Star Rating
  • opposition dude:

    Let’s be frank about something we can all agree on and that is the FACT that PAP won’t be reducing the numbers of non Singaporeans either already on the island or being let in. This issue was already a headache back in 2011 before the election. There was already widespread anger amongst voters over overcrowding (guess who are the people who made our country overcrowded?) and the PAP got a great shock when they lost their GRC and 2 ministers in one swift go.

    The PAP is most definitely hell bent on increasing the numbers of aliens and will use the same tired excuses of low birthrate, not enough locals, that we don’t have the necessary skill sets and of course their #1 favourite of aliens creating good jobs for us uh huh.

    I think it’s ok to assume that a good majority of people are fed up with PAP and can’t wait for the next election to be announced. Unfortunately we have to wait a few more years for that to happen.

    But don’t worry since PAP screws up regularly these days. From our failing transport system to failing HDB lifts to yearly failed AGO audits to the Indian variant of covid spreading and forming numerous clusters here to KTV familial ties (HA HA!) and KTVs becoming “wholesome” family F&B restaurants the list goes on.

    So let us see how many more screw ups we will read about up to the next election.

    GD Star Rating
  • @opposition dude

    I agree with you. The PAPies will never change, not that they don’t want to, but just that they don’t know how to.

    So best not to cry father cry mother now, let them do what they do best in continuing to screw the dafts. Hopefully when the next GE comes, enough dafts would wake up and cause a major vote swing against the PAPies.

    For a party that is as arrogant and stubborn as the PAPies, nothing anyone say would matter, so best to just remain quiet and remember.

    Maybe the C19 may speed up or cause the party’s demise, but that will only happen if there is a huge and massive outbreak the scale of which the 3 court jesters cannot contain.

    At the rate that this pandemic is being handled by their daily BS and dilly dally attitude, that day may come sooner than expected.

    Would I be too much to say “let us cross our fingers and hope the Delta does its job”?

    GD Star Rating
  • Blame Everything On Goh CT:

    When he took over, he thought he was very smart to let Indians come in and work in Singapore without realizing the effect for the future generation. Now he is very quiet seeing all this happening in Singapore . KNNBCCB

    GD Star Rating
  • MachiaveLee Puppetmaster:

    Everything about CECA boils down to a piece of wooden SHIT…one week visit to Swiss Alps with the cold wind freezing his BLAIN…he returns to declare Swiss standard by 2010…one visit to Bangalore India’s IT valley…and CECA was created in a mind that never deFROSTED from his visit to the Swiss Alps not even with the Heat of India.

    It was Woody & Mah Bow Tan(Ahgong’s blue-eyed boy) who shot the “Speculative HDB flat prices is your appreciating asset” narrative off the sprinting blocks like two blokes on a mission to Mars! Bloody shit they’ve bluffed us all ….. stealthily kept hidden the 99-year zero sum game….. and that’s what it really is: Pappies play the lifetime game of baiting and fishing out all your savings and resources (hefty interest rates running into hundreds of thousands $$$). You’re left stone cold at the halfway mark and your souls dry up with materialistic shackles in their mechanistic militarism….

    GD Star Rating
  • Laugh:

    Poor thing… Need help get the talented ceca :)

    GD Star Rating
  • useless pap paper generals:

    pap and its cronies in sph confuse the question.

    what question?

    the question was, why so many ceca ah nehs allowed into Singapore.

    pap and its cronies say, aha, the question is against FTA.


    who cares about FTA?

    everyone cares about too many ceca ah nehs admitted into small island.

    how stupid can pap, and its cronies the sph, be?

    ceca land is a land of 1.4b rapists, caste bigotists, everything bad.

    why allow so many ceca ah nehs into small island?

    where this that A;junied reject George yeo who allowed ceca FTA?


    we sleep well because, after all, it is a cotton sheep problem. cotton sheep, 61% of them, by voting pap GE2020, has caused itself the ceca ah neh problem.

    msg to TRE Tech – why are you against our moniker, LIew Mun Leong must be jailed? after all, it is a reminder that Liew Mun Leong, lying to pap police and pap prosecutors and pap courts, has not been prosecuted. we have a msg to remind each other. why is it offensive to you? please advise. thank you.

    Tech: It is offensive and against our TOS. We had allowed it for a short period and you have made your point.

    GD Star Rating
  • sad situation:

    Just look at the many underemployed Singaporean…
    Real sad….
    Still don’t want to do something drastic for the suffering PMETs?

    Stop all FTs for now…unless really talented one.

    GD Star Rating
  • Uselesstankl:



    GD Star Rating
  • SG is only good in....:

    Confusing you without facts and figures that people want.

    GD Star Rating

Leave a Reply

 characters available

Scroll Down For More Interesting Stuff

Member Services
Self-SupportMembers LoginSelf-Support
Sponsored Advertisement
Search On TR Emeritus
Sponsored Advertisement
Visitors Statistic
Latest Statistic