include("cmp.php");

Another PAP government Covid-19 cock-up

I’m surprised that TOC and the anti-PAP cybernuts KPKBing on TRE and FB on the PAP govt’s policy on opening up (if it has one which doesn’t seem to be the case) haven’t picked up on the fact that the Pfizer vaccine which most of us have been vaccinated with is rubbish relative to Moderna’s version.

America’s Centres for Disease Control and Prevention released a study showing that Moderna’s covid-19 vaccine was 95% effective at preventing hospitalisation, compared with 80% for Pfizer-BioNTech’s and 60% for Johnson & Johnson’s.

Economist, FT etc

We should have ordered a lot more Moderna. My friend who took Moderna despite having to get vaccinated it at an inconvenient time and place is feeling smug. As she’s in her 50s, she was afraid she might have to settle for Sinovac.

OK, OK, it’s more an understandable misstep than a cock-up. But my point is that the usual suspects are quiet on this. Why?

Btw, a separate study demonstrated that unvaccinated people were 11 times more likely to die of the disease than those who were fully jabbed.

One can only hope that Goh Meng Seng and other anti-vaxxers (Forward this to Goh Meng Seng and other S’poreans who wish us ill) suffer the consequences of trying to kill us with their misinformation. They should remember that Karma is a bitch.

 

 

Cynical Investor

Cynical Investor blogs at Thoughts of a Cynical Investor
.

yyy
READER COMMENTS BELOW

20 Responses to “Another PAP government Covid-19 cock-up”

  • More data lah:

    Need for more data’s to be make known to the public to make informed choice.
    Now more like the blind leading the blind.
    Too many unknown to make wise informed decision ,that is affecting long term health and even life.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • oxygen:

    ALL INSECTS are animals but not all animals are insect.

    Comical Investor: Btw, a separate study demonstrated that unvaccinated people were 11 times more likely to die of the disease than those who were fully jabbed.

    It has more to do with waning efficacy of vaccine (ageing ineffectiveness) and the immune-compromised status (riddled with all kinds of diseases) of aged unvaccinated.

    STUPID!

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • MarBowling:

    America’s Centres for Disease Control and Prevention released a study showing that Moderna’s covid-19 vaccine was 95% effective at preventing hospitalisation, compared with 80% for Pfizer-BioNTech’s and 60% for Johnson & Johnson’s.
    Economist, FT etc

    Response: so those Holee mRNA vaccines, Moderna, Pfizer and J&J are ONLY 95%, 80% and 60% RESPECTIVELY “EFFECTIVE” at PREVENTING HOSPITALIZATION? WHY NO MENTION OF % OF PREVENTING INFECTION OR TRANSMISSION OR DEATH? Thought the initial Holee and Noble AIM of these 3 HOLEE AND WONDER VACCINES with above 90% EFFICACY was TO PREVENT INFECTION, PERIOD. NOW ON HINDSIGHT, THEY ARE ADVOCATING A BOOSTER(3rd or maybe more jabs)TO “BOOST” the EFFICACY which has QUIETLY WANNED to 80% or below BACK TO ABOVE 90%! THINK EVENTUALLY GMS WILL HAVE THE LAST LAUGH!

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • So happy with second rated:

    Sputnik is the best. Forget Pfizer. Forget Moderna. Why is PAP not getting the best for Singaporeans?

    “A single dose of the pioneering Russian-made Sputnik V vaccine better protects the elderly against serious Covid-19 infections than a similar regime of certain other leading vaccines, a major new study from Argentina has shown.

    The findings were published online by the EClinicalMedicine, which is run by the British peer-reviewed medical journal The Lancet.”

    https://www.rt.com/russia/534708-sputnik-vaccine-argentina-study/

    Old folks died from Covid because they did not get the best vaccine. Can we sue the gov for making second rated decisions?

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Smart Nation:

    is it possible that the dosage administered for Moderna might be higher, and therefore more efficacious? If so, would higher dosage mean higher risk of unknown side effects?

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • xoxo:

    Who cares?
    As long as TH makes money,sgs can be disregarded?

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • I was over at a neighbour’s house last night for a drinking session with a doctor friend and I told him about Sinkie’s latest C19 figures of 800+.

    He told me that had this happened in any city in China, the head honchos of the city and health agency would all have already been sacked, along with many other smaller departmental heads.

    I then told him that most of the Sinkies are not concerned nor worried about the 800+ daily figures nor is the MTF planning to mass test or lockdown the city.

    He replied that he only has 2 words for the daft Sinkies:

    牛逼!

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Serious:

    This Covid better take it more serious.
    Already more than 4.6M death worldwide.
    Don’t play play with people life OK ?

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Serious Impact:

    This Covis is more serious and far more impact than Sept 11 2001 .
    The human and economic costs will be long lasting affecting many generations..
    Noe 4.6M death and still counting.

    Tech: Maybe this is God’s way of dealing with the over-crowding problem on planet earth? lol

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • kannan:

    Now talking about preventing hospitalisation. No longer dare to brag about 96% efficacy in preventing infection.

    From the beginning Sinovac was having 100% effectiveness in preventing hospitalisation in many countries.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • PAP mandate strong:

    Russia times RT ?

    Ranked 150 world press freedom index.

    News of Putin and Moscow officials kena !

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • PAP mandate strong:

    Vladimir Putin in self-isolation due to coronavirus cases in inner circle

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.scmp.com/news/world/russia-central-asia/article/3148761/vladimir-putin-self-isolation-due-coronavirus-cases

    Near 800 fatalities a day.

    Sg total so far how many < 100.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • The Great Reset:

    This is the WEF (world Economic Federation) Agenda call the “The Great Reset” Written 2000 years ago

    Listen to what this man has to say about the pandemic

    https://rumble.com/vlh876-unmasking-the-great-reset.html

    https://rumble.com/vlxo8s-unmasking-the-great-reset-part-2.html

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • 61% mandated:

    @ TRE techie

    Well 61% mandated.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • @61% mandated

    When the daily figures cross 4 digits (although not likely as it would be massaged downwards to avoid panic) and the death figures start rising, then and maybe then some of the 61% may eventually wake up to the reality that the MTF is packed with clowns trying to manage a situation beyond their pay grade. lol

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • maths idiot:

    GMS and @oxygen, what can I say, Abang Adik

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Billy ma:

    People should know that if you’re willing to pay enough to these so called experts, they’ll signed medical declaration that ‘smoking is good for you. It kills virus in your lungs’

    So at this time, there are many such experts telling whoever paid them enough to say whatever their sponsors want.

    The loudness of these experts depends on the $$$$ in their pockets.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • PAP mandate strong:

    https://news.sina.cn/kx/2021-09-15/detail-iktzqtyt6043559.d.html

    普京回应自我隔离:看看疫苗效果如何

    ” …….这名工作人员此前接种了疫苗,因抗体数值下降刚刚重新接种,但仍然确诊。同时,普京还表示,“我的抗体滴度相当高,看看这在实践中(效果)如何。希望‘卫星-V’(疫苗)确实能提供高度保护。”

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • oxygen:

    @ maths idiot

    ANOTHER AD HOMINEM – the best you can achieved?

    maths idiot: GMS and @oxygen, what can I say, Abang Adik

    If you and those without any content can’t handle the debating floor, why waste digital space?

    Get out of the floor or stay on the sideline as spectators!

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • oxygen:

    @ COMICAL INVESTOR, THE KEY CATCHWORDS are “Btw” and “a separate study demonstrate” but no weblink supplied for informed scrutiny and debate.

    ARE THESE temptations of “bait” (Btw and a separate study demonstrated…..) and “switch” of claimed “demonstrated” beneficial outcome which MAYBE in fact DUBIOUS when come under cross-examination in this forum of “evidence” screening??

    Comical Investor: Btw, a separate study demonstrated that unvaccinated people were 11 times more likely to die of the disease than those who were fully jabbed.

    I found another weblink which approximate the same claims proposed in this writing of yours……..”unvaccinated people were 11 times more likely to die of the disease than those who were fully jabbed”

    Israel booster jabs cutting severe Covid even as cases surge: experts

    https://sg.yahoo.com/news/israel-booster-jabs-cutting-severe-104456695.html

    IF YOU EXAMINE AND SCRUTINISE THIS aforementioned ARTICLE’s content of simple mathematical logic, I came to the easy conclusion its conclusion is ‘RUBBISH”

    IS THERE A “COCK-UP” (your vocabulary) in this TRE article welcomed contribution of yours?

    If it does, you might want to change this article contribution write up heading to something more reflective of its content?

    THANK YOU!

    GD Star Rating
    loading...

Leave a Reply

 characters available


Scroll Down For More Interesting Stuff


Member Services
Self-SupportMembers LoginSelf-Support
Sponsored Advertisement
Search On TR Emeritus
Sponsored Advertisement
Announcement
Advertisements
Visitors Statistic
Latest Statistic

UA-67043412-1