include("cmp.php");

Class Action for Judicial Review (Gentle Reminder)

This is a gentle reminder that TR Emeritus (TRE) is currently assisting in the collection, collaboration and corroboration of information of potential litigants for the planned Judicial Review challenge against the discriminatory policies slapped on the unvaccinated.

We are now able to confirm that there are at least 19 (NINETEEN)* potential litigants who are very seriously wanting to mount the Judicial Review challenge, to be assisted and advised by lawyers from Carson Law Chambers, namely Ms Thya and Mr Lim Tean.

The legal cost (including incidentals) for the action has been estimated to be about S$50,000 to S$80,000, which could/would be crowdfunded, depending on the number of litigants that are in this action (with more litigants, the legal cost would be very negligible).

At 100 litigants, the cost per litigant is roughly S$500.00 and at 500 litigants, the average cost per litigant is only S$100.

Per the lawyers’ recommendation, not all the litigants would need to meet the lawyers personally, except for the initial signing of the Warrant To Act (WTA), a legally required procedure. After the WTAs have been signed, the litigants will be represented by 2 agreed leaders, who would be directly involved with giving instructions to the lawyers on behalf of the other litigants. The leaders will then lias with the litigants via Zoom or Signal, whichever is more convenient.

Currently, TRE understands that:

  1. Last Sunday about 1,400 were on a zoom meeting about unvax organised by Iris Koh – many gave testimony and were in tears.
  2. People are very very angry now – today govt announced public officers  put on no-pay leave, contracts not renewed, pay for tests to enter work place!

If you are one of those affected by the alleged discriminatory policies slapped against the unvaccinated, you could be part of the action by contacting us with your basic information. It is clear as crystal that just making noise on social media and shedding tears on Zoom is not going to change anything, seeking legal recourse is the proper way forward.

For those interested, only your name, a contactable mobile number and a simple and short description of how you are affected will do, for example: “cannot go to work”. Please note that you do not need to be un-vaccinated to be a litigant in this action, if any of your family members is un-vaccinated and affected, that should suffice.

To facilitate the planned action, TRE has setup a special email address ([email protected]) only for those intending to join the action or have further questions. It will be functional only up till 17th November 2021 @ 2359 hrs ***, after which it will be disabled.

Initial information we require are your name, mobile contact and a brief description of how you are/would be affected.

All information received will be kept fully private and confidential and only released to the originator litigants and lawyers concerned. Should the action not proceed, we will shred all the information received on this email address.

To cut to the chase, we leave our readers with the following comment from one of our readers who has expressed strong support for the planned Judicial Review.

It is important to make a point that as a Nation, there are people who disagree with such persecution of the minority group of our fellow citizens and let it be recorded in history that no matter how small our numbers are, we uphold the principles of Basic Human Rights to human life.

To corner and push a group of people who refused to take the vaccine which technically could not pass the stringent criteria of approval for mass inoculation, to the extent of persecution and losing their jobs, is immoral, unethical and totally unacceptable for any decent human beings with dignity.

Please help to share this post on your social media pages and channels.

Thank you for your continued support and do stay safe.
.

* The number of potential litigants will be updated on a as and when basis, when TRE has received confirmation of an intention to join the action.

** TRE is also on FaceBook at  and Twitter.

*** Cut-off date for those wanting to join the action has been extended by another 10 days as a group of litigants have expressed interest to join and their representative would need time to collect all the information needed.

 

TRE’s servers do not run on free air and there are charges incurred in the thousands of dollars per year. If you believe in what we do, please consider signing up for our membership or making a small donation here.

 

 

yyy
READER COMMENTS BELOW

50 Responses to “Class Action for Judicial Review (Gentle Reminder)”

  • Majullah:

    Yes. Go get them.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • I figure at least 100,000 or more are affected. Only 10 felt “strongly” to warrant an action, the rest all “sup sup water, bo dai ji”?

    Currently, TRE understands that:

    1. Last Sunday about 1,400 were on a zoom meeting about unvax organised by Iris Koh – many gave testimony and were in tears.
    2. People are very very angry now – today govt announced public officers put on no-pay leave, contracts not renewed, pay for tests to enter work place!

    Again, cry father cry mother but when it comes to taking action, all waiting for someone else.

    A typical case of everyone is waiting for someone to do something but in the end nothing is done by anyone.

    Or maybe a case of not painful enough, lose job only wat, just cry and pretend that everything will be fine when the Sun rises tomorrow?

    I really cannot understand how Sinkies think. Do you?

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Pinky is useless anyway:

    In tears but elections, they voted PAP.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Harder Truths:

    Let us be realistic to avoid any illusions on how things are going to turn out.

    $G is a Totalitarian Communist State with the Regime on par with North Korea’s junta. The people are the property of the State. If you don’t like it too bad.

    There is no Rule of Law in $G. It is Rule of Regime. That is it. They decide any outcome. No matter if you are innocent, if they say you are guilty then you are guilty, and voice versa. So after the Judicial Challenge when inside becomes outside and Indian suddenly becomes Malay just do not be too disappointed.

    The Regime does what it likes, when it likes, how it likes. It is too late to change anything. If you can’t get off the Titanic then you are going to go under with it.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • nathan chen:

    This Judicial Review will be stopped dead in its track when Judges take the easy way out and say they leave it to the Executive Branch as the PM and his ministers are running Singapore. Lawyers must have answers when they are given these roundabouts from the Judiciary. There are precedents and Lawyers are well aware of this. Lawyers, who take up this Judicial Review, must be prepared to go much further this time.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Also Cannot Understand:

    TRE Techie:
    I figure at least 100,000 or more are affected. Only 10 felt “strongly” to warrant an action, the rest all “sup sup water, bo dai ji”?

    Currently, TRE understands that:
    Again, cry father cry mother but when it comes to taking action, all waiting for someone else.

    A typical case of everyone is waiting for someone to do something but in the end nothing is done by anyone.

    Or maybe a case of not painful enough, lose job only wat, just cry and pretend that everything will be fine when the Sun rises tomorrow?

    I really cannot understand how Sinkies think. Do you?

    Organize Pink Dot, easily 20,000 supporters.
    Fighting for ar*eholes is more important.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Realistically:

    I remain ready to litigate IN PERSON………..I challenged NAY SAYERS to put their MONEY where their mouths are……..that the “Judges take the easy way out” blah blah…….

    From what I have researched, there is a STRONG case FOR judicial review…..those NAY SAYERS obviously do NOT quite know what they are talking about.

    Tech: I have already said many times that this is a group action, so if you wish to go pro se (represent yourself), then you are on your own and independent of this action. Good luck!

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Realistically:

    @ Tech:

    >>I have already said many times that this is a group action, so if you wish to go pro se (represent yourself), then you are on your own and independent of this action. Good luck!<<

    No problem…….mine would be separate, if it comes to pass……….I'll try crowd funding myself.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Realistically:

    Also the lawyers don’t need to worry………..I would not be applying to the Registrar for any copy of their filings…………if the ‘class action’ commences………..

    Like I said, I have my own legal grounds/arguments………..In The Matter Of: ……

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • xoxo:

    From being arrogant to dictatorial.
    61 pct of sgs love getting screwed especially civil servants who treat their votes irresponsibly n cause other sgs to suffer.

    Look at their faces.
    Listen to their voices.
    Full of arrogance.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • @Also Cannot Understand

    Ah… I could be wrong. TRE has just been contacted by a group and it appears this action is set to be a class action comprising many many more litigants than what I had initially thought was 10 only.

    Never been to Supreme Court, wonder if the courts can one shot take hundreds of litigants bo? lol

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Trust only myself:

    Must be a joke to proceed with the case, of all place in Singapore….
    The liars control everything even the ……

    If 100,000 affected each one pay $1 will be more than enough but all wait and see…..only 10 currently willing to proceed?

    All the unvax public officers to be on no pay leave should be just nice only what…….they liked to be screwed every election so why pity them?

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Bernard Tan:

    Talk is cheap. Talk is negative.
    Action now to move and change the situation.
    You reap what you sowed.

    Vote wisely to secure your children’s and the many generations future back.
    MERDEKA MERDEKA MERDEKA
    2024/2025

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Calvin The Mouth:

    ”Calvin Cheng: Time to mandate vaccination for seniors, with criminal penalties for those who refuse”
    ”“In Singapore, 67% of the serious cases come from 1.5% of the population… Another 15-20% come from unvaccinated people below 60.””

    ”He also noted that there are seniors who have been vaccinated who “will unfortunately still die,” adding, “there is a lot of overlap between this group and those that would die of pneumonia in any given year.”
    And… so the war has begun.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • nathan chen:

    @ Realistically. Don’t talk big. This is not as simple as making a police report. Remember?

    Your application for leave will failed. You won’t have a single day in Court. Difficult to swallow? Too bad.

    People like you deserve to learn the hard way. If you are smart, you work with TRE and Lim Tean the seasoned lawyer. Maybe pooled resources. But I think that’s not good enough for you.

    I bear no grudges with you and wish you best of luck. But luck won’t be enough.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Four president:

    How many % votes Tony tan gather?

    Also one thing.Cancer no cure.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Big Fang:

    Don’t be like that lah. We all believe him. Even the judge says he very tok kong. Please ask for money quick. We are waiting to contribute.

    nathan chen:
    @ Realistically. Don’t talk big. This is not as simple as making a police report. Remember? Your application for leave will failed. You won’t have a single day in Court. Difficult to swallow? Too bad. People like you deserve to learn the hard way. If you are smart, you work with TRE and Lim Tean the seasoned lawyer. Maybe pooled resources. But I think that’s not good enough for you. I bear no grudges with you and wish you best of luck. But luck won’t be enough.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • MarBowling:

    Calvin The Mouth:
    November 5, 2021 at 10:05 pm (Quote)
    ”Calvin Cheng: Time to mandate vaccination for seniors, with criminal penalties for those who refuse”

    Response: Chiu Cheng Kia, Heaven and the Barn Owl will be watching your LJ and CB Bg Mouth 24/7/365! Man proposes god disposes! Karma and Retribution will eventually catch up with you and your FamiLEE!

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • @Big Fang

    Yes, he has represented himself in the Supreme Courts in his own case. So he can be said to be competent.

    However, since this JR is a class action, then it has to be done through professionals, thus he doesn’t qualify. Who would donate/trust a layman with possibly 10s of thousands of dollars, right?

    That being said, there is no stopping him from filing his own lawsuit and who knows, the judges may decide to certify a class to combine his case into ours. He can then still have his day in court. lol

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • 阿拉妈!:

    白忙一场,肯定会是这样子的!

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • @阿拉妈

    When you have a village bully, if everyone adopts the same mindset as you and does not wish to make a police report, nothing will be done.

    At least, with a police report, maybe an investigator handling the case may feel strongly about the bully and decides to take action, right? Even if the possibility is remote, you never know if you never try.

    At the very least, the action will let the world knows that hundreds, if not thousands are being discriminated against and these people are very angry and maybe even hungry.

    No government in the world dare to take the livelihood away from its citizens like that, US of A tried and they faced a huge backlash. Sinkieland must be the 1st country in the world that is actively trying to ‘kill off’ its unvax citizens, with no resistance whatsoever.

    And this is what the 61% voted for?

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • 阿拉妈:

    差别对待是必要的手段。

    共同的敌人是冠病病毒。

    病毒也是未接种疫苗者的敌人。

    共同敌人被消滅后,必要的手段就不会存在了!

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • @阿拉妈

    必要的手段也是要合理和公平, 对吗?

    搞到未接种疫苗者都失业, 是必要的吗?

    如果这方法能行, 中国难道不会早就实施了, 还会轮到新加坡这群废才先搞?

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Realistically:

    @ @ nathan chen:
    November 5, 2021 at 11:59 pm

    >.Your application for leave will failed. You won’t have a single day in Court. Difficult to swallow? Too bad.<<

    "Application for leave"?

    Do YOU even know what YOU are toking about?

    Hey, you should go do some reading about what judicial review is all about………….especially pertaining to this COVID-19 issue regarding he MMTF's measures………..

    Well, as far as I am concern, you are just another low life too clever by half ranter, like so many in SINKaPOOR who swallow hook line and sinker into the wayang-party snake oil cons…………..too bad, sinkies as a whole are paying for your kind of low life rubbish …….with their lives and for those still living, their miseries, sufferings, loss of jobs etc………….and the huge negative impact on the economy ……which necessitates the increase in fares on public transportation etc – akan datang and soon, GST hikes and other revenue raising measures……..while the wayang-party MPs can continue to luxuriate on their $16k monthly MP allowance to wayang in and out of Parliament simply by helping to legitimise the bankruptcy of the emeperor without clothes regime utter incompetence.

    Hey, if you are so free, maybe you should call out the piece in today's 160th ranked ST joint opinions by Professor Teo Yik Ying and Professor Vernon Lee.

    Good day…………and I dun intend to continue with YOU.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Realistically:

    @ nathan chen:
    November 5, 2021 at 11:59 pm

    Let me start by asking YOU what is your credentials/experience with the BROKEN justice system……..YOU and other readers might like to go through the thread b4 on my experience:

    https://www.tremeritus.net/2021/08/06/the-law-minister-and-attorney-general-have-failed-to-safeguard-our-rights-as-citizens/

    People like you, apparently, do NOT quite understand what TRAVESTIES OF JUSTICE mean……..maybe YOU and your ilks should read up about JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE………..b4 trying to teach your grandmother how to suck egg, as the saying goes.
    We have to live with the system we got……………….and that this judicial review lawsuit would not have been necessary if the wayang-party MPs have discharge their fundamental duties and responsibilities as genuine oppos IN PARLIAMENT……..pertaining to the emperor without clothes epic mismanagement of the COVID-19 pandemic resulting in the DEATHS of 468 people, many of which are PREVENTABLE, especially those which occurred over the last 2-3 months.

    AND what about the other so-called oppos been doing………..ZILCH.
    But those are beside the point for the time being.

    If you and your ilk are so ignorant, it is quite disgusting to preach your ignorance that:
    “Don’t talk big. This is not as simple as making a police report. Remember?”

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • @Realistically

    Why are you always so angry all the time and deem everyone who disagrees with you as “trash”/

    You really need to be more humble and control your temper or else you may kenna HBP like me, then jialut liao.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Realistically:

    @ TRE Techie:
    November 6, 2021 at 11:34 am (Quote)

    >>Why are you always so angry all the time and deem everyone who disagrees with you as “trash”/<<

    In the light of 468 DEATHS as of 5/11/2021 and counting; with 212,745 infections………..and YOU are asking "why I am always so angry all the time"?

    That low life ranter, did NOT just "DISAGREE" with me, BUT trying to DISCREDIT and SMEAR me with his "Don't talk big. This is not as simple as making a police report" when he has NOT shown any info as to his credentials and knowledge of what he is talking about?

    Please get REAL and face the REALITIES.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Realistically:

    By the way, how many times, if at all, has ANY of the judicial review applications succeed……………with the kind of arguments presented?

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Realistically:

    Should have been SUCCEEDED if at all.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Realistically:

    @ TRE Techie:
    November 6, 2021 at 11:34 am (Quote)

    >>Why are you always so angry all the time and deem everyone who disagrees with you as “trash”/<<

    You might also like to point out ANY of my posts which had not been based on the FACTS/REALITIES and also point out ANY of the posts by ranters like nathan chen and or other low life too clever by half posters which call out the emperor without clothes FAILURES?

    Take for example my debunking of the running dogs propaganda in the thread:

    https://www.tremeritus.net/2021/10/31/this-baby-you-want-or-not/

    Realistically:
    November 4, 2021 at 10:32 am (Quote)
    —–

    You see ANY thing wrong with what I'd posted in that thread or ANY other thread?

    Like I hv said time and again, what has been the effect of all these ranters on the various social media, starting with sintercom.org, delphi forum sammyboy 3-in-1 kopitiam, TRE, TOC etc……..achieved over the years, since around 1996……….over 25 years?

    How much more sufferings must sinkies continue to bear with SINKaPOOR sinking deeper and deeper into the shit hole?

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Realistically:

    @ TRE Techie:
    November 6, 2021 at 11:34 am (Quote)

    >>Why are you always so angry all the time and deem everyone who disagrees with you as “trash”/<>Your application for leave will failed.<<

    Why don't YOU, speak to Lim Tean and ask Lim Tean if "LEAVE" is required for a judicial review hearing for this application pertaining to the JR of the emperor without clothes MMTF's various measures to coerce sinkies who cannot/do not want to be vaccinated with the mRNA vaccines.

    Rather than tok cok about "Why are you always so angry ……and deem everyone who disagrees with you as "trash"?…….get YOUR facts right.

    As for "EVERYONE" who disagrees with me, I suggest to examine their MOTIVATION for their kind of comments. And I suggest you read up what he emperor without clothes said, during the cross-examination by Lim Tean, as Leong Sze Hian's counsel in the EWC's defamation suit against Leong, that he (the EWC) considered Leong's political activities to constitute only an "ANT BITE" and that the EWC also said that the EWC had OTHER un-named person more damaging to him (the EWC)?

    Tech: Lim Tean is the lawyer acting in this action, not me. So I do not need to know the court procedures at all, it is out of my job description. I know you are very well-versed in the law, but even if you write until the cows come home, it will not change the fact that it will be the lawyers that will be representing the litigants, not you.

    As I have said many times, you want to go solo, it’s your prerogative, no need to show off your legal knowledge here on TRE because it is not the correct platform. By all means, go ahead and file the papers, we can always catch up on your progress via the Shitty Times.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Realistically:

    Oh, as far as my “prerogative” is concerned, I won’t bother you or TRE……my main objective is that there should be no NATO……..in view of the hundreds of PREVENTABLE DEATHS.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Realistically:

    I would just like to say that it is NOT right that some of my comments DEBUNKING other’s attempt to discredit me is unpubllished.

    I said that @nelson chan is WRONG to suggest that leave to file judicial application is required in this case ie applying for judicial review as to whether the discriminatory measures announced by the emperor without clothes MMTF BREACH/VIOLATE one’s right under the Constitution.

    I suggested that Techie ask Lim Tean where it is necessary to apply for leave to file for a judicial review…………..all Lim Tean needs to answer is YES or NO…………simple and strait forward as that, since @nelson chan had raised this.

    As I’ve said, there is NO NEED to apply for leave to file JR in such cases………..we shall wait and see if Lim Tean is required to apply fr such leave from the record in the case file.

    Tech: You are so unbelievable, you have to hunt down every person with slight negative views on this action? So free meh?

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Harun Aminurasyid:

    COMMUNITY POWERS:
    Sovereign people, naturally, have the power to rule their homes, communities, and nations.

    2. A freely-elected representative government has no power that is superior to the People, [because sovereignty resides in the People, not in the representatives of the People].

    3. It is often reported that officials are “elected into power”, whereas they are actually “elected into office”. An elected official can only have delegated powers, because they are always subservient to their electors. Public Servants, by definition, are subservient to Private Sovereigns.

    4. Unfortunately, most people do not exercise their sovereignty.

    5. Sovereign living people are in the Common Law jurisdiction – the national Law-of-the-Land (lawful), while legally generated corporate “artificial persons” created by the State are in the Admiralty/Maritime/Commercial jurisdiction – the international Law-of-the-Sea (legal).

    6. Employees of a corporation cannot exercise authority over their Chief Executive Officer (CEO), nor can “artificial persons” created by the State exercise authority over an incorporated governmental agency. Therefore, people who “act” in the “roles” of “artificial persons” have NO sovereign authority.

    7. Corporate processes of hearing and redress are subservient, for example “submissions”, “appeals”, and “petitions”. Whereas Common Law processes of hearing and redress are sovereign, for example “notices”, “orders”, and “declarations”.

    8. Governments at all levels, including city and town councils, have been legally incorporated into the global debt-money system of bondage and largely usurped by a myriad of corporate interests.

    9. But whenever governance in any form becomes harmful to the People, it is the right of the People to hold such governance to account, to seek redress for wrongdoing, or ultimately to institute new governance that will safe-guard the People.

    10. All political power is inherent in the People, and all political organization begins at home. Therefore, the political powers of the People are first exercised governmentally when electing and overseeing their local Public Servants on a town or city council.

    11. When a community of Private People wishes to exercise their sovereign authority over their Public Servants in the Common Law, they can post a Notice of a People’s Assembly, during which they can ratify any majority decision of the community.

    12. By this process, a community of Private People can serve a notice on their Public Servants, or write a community Bill of Rights, and so on, if they deem it necessary to protect their community of life.

    13. The documents created by a People’s Assembly must be autographed by a freely-elected Committee, witnessed, and acknowledged for the record by a Justice.

    14. In Common Law nations, community Justices are sworn to serve the Private People, upholding the Common Law-of-the-Land, which protects life and peace.

    15. A Justice of the Common Law is known appropriately as a “Justice of the Peace”. Their service is free, and mobile, to ensure accessibility. They can hold a Common Law “court-of-record” wherever they set up their desk with their documentation, Bible, stamps, and pen.

    16. Common Law procedures are common sense. Conduct must be fair and transparent, providing full disclosure of any information relevant to decision-making.

    17. Notices of People’s Assemblies for your community, and notices sent to Public Servants, must provide a reasonable time-frame for a response, such as at least seven (7) days. Statements of fact according to belief must be witnessed by at least one other man or woman in the presence of a Justice of the Peace, or a similarly sworn man or woman.

    18. Public Servants have no authority that is not granted to them by the Private People, and once a People’s Assembly has spoken on a community matter, there is no higher authority who can overturn it.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Harun Aminurasyid:

    1. “An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no right; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed.”

    2. The rule of Law meant that everyone in a State, including the government, is subject to the Law. One such law, the Supreme law of the land – is the Constitution. Article 4 of the Constitution States:

    3. “This Constitution is the supreme law of the Republic of Singapore and any law enacted by the Legislature after the commencement of this Constitution which is inconsistent with this Constitution shall, to the extent of the inconsistency, is void.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Vaccine Mandate Invalid:

    US court cancelled Biden’s mandate order. Those judges got balls.

    Waiting to see whether other judges got anything.

    https://www.rt.com/usa/539556-court-freezes-biden-vaccine-mandate/

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Linda Smith Skinner:

    U must be a male chauvinistic pig!

    Only half of the people endowed with family jewels!

    Vaccine Mandate Invalid:
    US court cancelled Biden’s mandate order. Those judges got balls.

    Waiting to see whether other judges got anything.

    https://www.rt.com/usa/539556-court-freezes-biden-vaccine-mandate/

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Realistically:

    @ Tech:

    >>You are so unbelievable, you have to hunt down every person with slight negative views on this action? So free meh?<<

    I hv said what needs to be said.

    Maybe YOU and TRE's moderators should firstly understand what is meant by GOOD FAITH, which @nelson chan etc, have lacked.

    Secondly, do also understand what's meant by being MALICIOUS intent, which of course is closely linked to Good Faith.

    Thirdly, and linked to the 1st & 2nd is CRIMINAL DEFAMATION.

    Fourthly, do understand certain BASICS of the law……….like whether leave from the court is required for judicial review………which in this and related cases is NOT………………

    Fifthly, the poster's credentials and if the person is just toking with motivated interest aimed at discrediting me..

    Lastly, but not unimportantly, get better acquainted with @ Harun Aminurasyid: November 7, 2021 at 1:37 am, contribution, which, to me is relevant.

    Good day and good luck…………I shall refrain from further comments on the JR and hews related to the COVID-19 pandemic………..as far as possible.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • @Vaccine Mandate Invalid

    Supreme Court judges in USA, if I am not wrong, are appointed by Congress and are on permanent tenure. Even the president has no power to sack them.

    The chief Justice in Sinkieland is appointed by Milo, acting under instruction from the LEEders and thus can be removed/retired easily with a simple phone call, no?

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • nathan chen:

    If you are so sure, why ask Lim Tean? You don’t have a lawyer licence, shut up. Tech, buck off. I can handle this show off myself. For once, I just don’t want others distracted by my tirades. But this show off thinks this time he can shut me up for good with his yak, yak yak. Tech, what slight negative view are you talking about. I support this JR. When I said this, ‘Judges take the easy way out and say they leave it to the Executive Branch as the PM and his ministers are running Singapore’ I mean it as an input. Remember Tan Cheng Bok’s JR on the Malay President Election. How did it end up? After touching on the legal standpoints from both side, The Judge ruled that the Judiciary had to defer to the Executive as the PE is also a political decision. I am writing based on my memory and in my own words based on my understanding at that time.The JR challenged on the discrimination of the unvaccinated may end up like the PE challenge by TCB. Is this not a real possibility. Further, I suggest Carson Lawyers must have a better argument than the TCB lawyers when the presiding Judge uses the same argument why he has to defer to the Executive Branch. I think Mr Show off should as Tan Cheng Bok’s lawyer about application for JR before he ask Lim Tean. This CB in Citizen online is full of shit, here he also the same.

    Tech: Hello, I know him longer than you and my comment was directed at him, not anybody else, you so worked up for fiack? Since when have I said your take on this matter is wrong?

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Nathan Chen:

    So what if you knew him longer than me. I am not interested. Even if has a lawyer’s practise he be just a mediocre lawyer. He is implying Han Hui Hui cannot be trusted and try to deny it when challenged. What’s wrong with an opinion. You have yours too. You also have dimmed views for people challenging the States like the police, the court and the government, until this JR.

    Tech: I don’t take things personally, I deal with each and individual issues on its own merit, just because I have spoken for the police does not mean I like the police and vice-versa. You are as much entitled to your own opinion as I do mine.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Realistically:

    >>Remember Tan Cheng Bok’s JR on the Malay President Election. <<

    As I've said this low life ranter does NOT know what he is toking about……..A judicial review APPLICATION is totally different from an APPEAL to the Court of Appeal against a lower court judgment.

    Read the CA judgment, paragraph 1 (ie at [1]) opening sentence, under 'Introduction':

    "1 This APPEAL turns on the correct interpretation of two provisions in the Constitution of the Republic of Singapore (1985 Rev Ed, 1999 Reprint) (“Constitution”), Arts 19B and 164."

    I have re-typed the word APPEAL in the CA judgment in CAPITAL letters for emphasis.

    The intended "class action" for judicial review application for judicial REVIEW of the MMTF measures, I believe from what has been stated by TRE, is NOT about the interpretation of the "two provisions in the Constitution, BUT whether the MMTF measures BREACH the Constitution guarantee of a citizen's RIGHTS.

    Readers can judge for themselves……………as I've said recently, I would refrain from commenting on the intended "class action" for judicial review APPLICATION and issues pertaining to the COVID-19 pandemic.

    I hv also said that some people are so LOW LIFE because they have absolutely NO DIGNITY about spouting their crap.

    Tech: Nice, have you filed the necessary papers? It would be a good start.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Realistically:

    @ Tech:

    >>Nice, have you filed the necessary papers?<<

    Please read the latest announcement by MMTF's Ong Ye Kung that certain class of people are or would be EXEMPTED …

    I don't intend to clarify …….

    Tech: I do read and these ‘exemptions’ are superficial and at best wayangs only. It does not address anything. If you do not proceed because of his ‘promises’, then you are so easy to hoodwink.

    Note: To better protect the unvaccinated who are at higher risk of infection and severe illness, we intend to expand VDS to more settings over time. Does that sound like any concession to you?

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • nathan chen:

    @ TRE Police.

    Go and tell your old friend, don’t take things personal. Don’t tell me. Standing up against personal attacks and insult and hitting back is not taking things personal. Your good friend know the law but how much of the law. He only looks good when he is talking law to himself. He will not withstand scrutiny from lawyers from the opposite side. He can’t take pressure from others and have to resort to sound and fury doing himself in. He, will melt in Court.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Realistically:

    >> He will not withstand scrutiny from lawyers from the opposite side.<<

    That guy is NOT ONLY low life, but has turned himself into behaving like a MAD DOG.

    "…lawyers from the opposing side" betterer than the Chief Justice plus judge of appeal Steven Chong plus long time senior justice Woo Bih Li who were in the coram in the case mentioned?

    Readers should ask why the Court of Appeal judgment as mentioned in https://www.tremeritus.net/2021/08/06/the-law-minister-and-attorney-general-have-failed-to-safeguard-our-rights-as-citizens/

    suddenly was no longer available?

    I believe this was the ONLY court of appeal judgment removed, out of perhaps tens of thousands since the SINKaPOOR judgment became available on the web…………

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Search properly:

    A search of
    “HH Bin v SL Ho (acting as executrix and trustee in the estate of Gillian Ho Siu Ngin) [2020] SGCA 4″
    shows a few good links to the pdf.

    https://www.singaporelawwatch.sg/Portals/0/Docs/Judgments/2020/2020%20SGCA%204.pdf

    So the conspiracy is that the case file was removed, and now that TRE has made such a big noise, the case file is quickly put back online?

    Did you succeed in getting any money? Results count.

    Realistically:
    >> He will not withstand scrutiny from lawyers from the opposite side.<<

    That guy is NOT ONLY low life, but has turned himself into behaving like a MAD DOG.

    “…lawyers from the opposing side” betterer than the Chief Justice plus judge of appeal Steven Chong plus long time senior justice Woo Bih Li who were in the coram in the case mentioned?

    Readers should ask why the Court of Appeal judgment as mentioned in https://www.tremeritus.net/2021/08/06/the-law-minister-and-attorney-general-have-failed-to-safeguard-our-rights-as-citizens/

    suddenly was no longer available?

    I believe this was the ONLY court of appeal judgment removed, out of perhaps tens of thousands since the SINKaPOOR judgment became available on the web…………

    Tech: Why should TRE even bother to make “so much noise” on a case that it has no vested interest in nor of public interest? As for me, I have absolutely no interest in this closed case whatsoever.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • shorter route should suffice:

    //He only looks good when he is talking law to himself.//

    law is like a meandering labyrinth but we still need to play their game rules (law & statutes of the country right ???) ???

    this labyrinth can be full of technicalities (can also be known as “nonsense” to laymen ??) and yet it can become like 4 = 5 and selected = elected in the context of our dear sinkie land ? and sometimes the labyrinth leads many to a lot of “unnecessary” twists and turns (“path dependency” of the rules ??) when a simple shorter route should suffice ??

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Realistically:

    @ Search properly:
    November 10, 2021 at 10:35 pm

    >>So the conspiracy is that the case file was removed, and now that TRE has made such a big noise, the case file is quickly put back online?<<

    Thanks for the update…….it just goes to show how the emperor without clothes regime's bankrupt policies.

    As the earlier TRE thread I posted, the said case became UNAVAILABLE during THAT period of time, and must be reinstated after a certain period of time, just to (hopefully) discredit me (and others similarly affected).

    I believe it does not take much effort to reinstate the case………….in any case it is clear beyond ANY doubt about the travesties of justice…………..because the said CA judgment is totally against and contrary to CORE FUNDAMENTAL JURISPRUDENCE PRINCIPLES………………remember that the threshold for striking out – whether it is FACTUALLY and or LEGALLY sustainable – is applicable to ALL civil litigation cases……..NOT unique to mine alone.

    Tech: You are so cute. You honestly think that the LEEders give a fiack for anak anak case, so much so that it has to “hide” the judgment?

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Realistically:

    @ shorter route should suffice:
    November 11, 2021 at 10:17 am (Quote)

    >.this labyrinth can be full of technicalities (can also be known as “nonsense” to laymen ??) and yet it can become like 4 = 5 and selected = elected in the context of our dear sinkie land ? and sometimes the labyrinth leads many to a lot of “unnecessary” twists and turns (“path dependency” of the rules ??) when a simple shorter route should suffice ??<<

    I hv avoided responding to you and would continue to do so because you dun hv the courage to stick on one moniker, let alone reveal your true identity.

    However, the said case [2020] SGCA 4 is what I hv said to be a smoking gun if ever there was one.

    Why? Because, as I said, it is contrary and contravene the CORE FUNDAMENTAL JURISPRUDENCE principles; their (the judges) FIDELITY to their oath of office per the Constitution and several Articles of the Constitution; Rule of Law; and the "paramount objective of all self-respecting courts (as described in a CA judgment), and against statute laws.

    Which is why I hv said that our common law system is one of adversarial in nature and that Counsels should conduct their cases so as to make it less likely to pronounce a judgment contrary to and in contradiction of settled laws and CORE FUNDAMENTAL JURISPRUDENCE principles.

    As former CJ Chan Sek Khiong had stated publicly when he was the CJ,

    "Like all common law judges, Singapore judges are not free to decide as they like. They are bound by established principles of law and procedure.”

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • sibei chim:

    //Which is why I hv said that our common law system is one of adversarial in nature and that Counsels should conduct their cases so as to make it less likely to pronounce a judgment contrary to and in contradiction of settled laws and CORE FUNDAMENTAL JURISPRUDENCE principles.//

    aiyoh ?? you sibei chim you know ?? counsels should conduct to make it less likely to pronounce a judgment blah blah blah ??? teach those counsels lor how they are going to know how the judgment is going to be pronounced in any certain or specific way lor ?? if everything is settled (finality as in your so-called settled law ??), then what are counsels for ??

    //”Like all common law judges, Singapore judges are not free to decide as they like. They are bound by established principles of law and procedure.”//

    aiyoh ??? judges are super talented people lar ?? they know how to look for differentiating elements in any case to support their OWN JUDGEMENT AND still stay within “established principles of law and procedure” (whatever they are lar ??) ??

    GD Star Rating
    loading...

Leave a Reply

 characters available


Scroll Down For More Interesting Stuff


Member Services
Self-SupportMembers LoginSelf-Support
Sponsored Advertisement
Search On TR Emeritus
Sponsored Advertisement
Announcement
Advertisements
Visitors Statistic
Latest Statistic

UA-67043412-1