include("cmp.php");

Ukraine and Taiwan

Ukraine is the Taiwan of Europe. Putin and Russia are not the warmongers. They are only trying to break out of the US encirclement strategy to save their country. If nothing is done to counter the US using Ukraine as a battering ram like what it is doing now provoking end arming Taiwan to undermine China’s sovereignty and territorial integrity then in the end both the very existence of Russia and China will be imperiled.

These two countries must do all it can to thwart the evil machinations of the US and its allies to maintain their unipolar dominance and hegemony in the world despite their abysmal performance in almost every sector of their political economy.

It is very clear that during Donald J Trump’s Presidency Zelensky the President of Ukraine was already behaving like a minion. He was already receiving massive military and financial aid from America to prepare for a likely conflict with Russia.

Donald Trump was not happy with him because he felt that his regime was corrupt and as the American President he felt compelled to lean on Zelensky to try and get damaging information on corrupt Joe Biden and his son to help him win the next election. He was so brazèned and accorded absolutely no respect to Zelinski that he even published a wholesale transcript of his confidential telephone conversation with this minion president to prove that what he was doing was right and that the Zelenski regime was indeed corrupt.

The entire saga of this event undermined even the State Department and the Secretary of State John Bolton that almost brought Donald Trump to be impeached by Congress. But Zelensky escaped unscathed and went on to become the war hero resisting “Russian attacks” against Ukraine in 2022.

If a Third World War is to be avoided then the current war in Europe must not spread to other regions like the Asia-Pacific. Russia must not be allowed to go down. If Russia goes down then China will be the next country to go down. It is therefore imperative that China stand shoulder-to-shoulder with Russia in order to stop the US warlike strategy of pivoting to the Indo-Pacific and the Far East.

Europe is now in utter disarray especially with the United Kingdom plunging into financial suicide with its stupid new Prime Minister Truss giving a huge tax reduction to the wealthy that will sink the English Pound and bring the entire country country to its knees. Instability and anarchy will unleash right-wing forces across Europe and the world to look for irrational solutions. The country that has the capacity and resolve in its history to put a road block to anarchy war and nihilism is China. It is essential that the peace-loving people of the world rally around the People’s Republic in order to save the world from another round of perdition.

 

Lowinsky

 

 

yyy
READER COMMENTS BELOW

186 Responses to “Ukraine and Taiwan”

  • Rejoinder @Xoxo:

    ((You cant help but wonder why kids could simply go around shooting their school-mates,teachers,neighbours and even parents. I am not saying this does not happen at all in other countries,democratic or socialist. But,the regularity of such incidents in FREE U$A?
    WHAT IS REAL /true FREEDOM?
    WHAT we are witnessing is what i would call FALSE freedom; it is born of EVIL rather than GOODNESS.))

    Why do Biden and the far-leftists hate America? Satanism has established itself.

    https://youtu.be/pllML6OQRLk

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Good Joker:

    Every point you make here is pointless.

    Issue – what’s the issue. Unable to clarify.
    Which court – unable to identify.

    China-Philipines case is the same for you.
    Issue – identify wrongly.
    Which court – unable to identify.

    You better don’t tell people which school you come from.

    SINGAROAR:
    @Good Joker
    PEACE PALACE IN THE HAGUE (NETHERLANDS)It has 15 judges who are chosen by the UN General Assembly and the Security Council.
    China is a member of the Security Council and is proposing new laws for its belt and road ventures. The Philippines won its case against China in a land dispute using the International Courts. At this point I am using VB’s question and ask “What school did you go to?” Your ignorance is showing…….!

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Western Sheep:

    You are so kind in giving these brainwashed people a good lesson. I doubt their brains can understand.

    knn:
    Taiwan is a domestic issue of China and does not need an international court to sit and decide if it belongs to China or otherwise. Period.

    The international court will only decide on international issues, ie issues between states when both states agree to let the international court to decide like the Singapore Malaysia Horseburg Lighthouse case. Even the claims of Sabah by the Philippines would not go to the international court unless both sides agree so.

    In today’s politicising of everything, no one would be stupid enough to go to the international court to decide on their territorial issues when the members of the bench can be from unfriendly countries that may not favour them for political or whatever reasons.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Western Sheep:

    As I said, and I repeat, the “International Courts” already settled the Taiwan issue. The decision was made long ago and available openly and freely at many places.

    @knn is right. There is not need for UN to declare that Taiwan is part of China. UN does not have this kind of power. The decision by UN to replace the legitimate government of China from Taipei to Beijing is clear enough. Only western propaganda and their western sheep twist that clear decision to claim Taiwan as the 99th state of US.

    But you are zero understanding of UN, especially UNGA and UNSC. You simply swallow Western propaganda and vomit them all over the place. Shameful, very shameful and extremely shameful.

    BK: Lol. So why did your frd the Eunuch said intl courts settled Taiwan issue? He not only lied but double down, triple down (:

    knn: Taiwan is a domestic issue of China and does not need an international court to sit and decide if it belongs to China or otherwise. Period.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • BK:

    Western Sheep:
    As I said, and I repeat, the “International Courts” already settled the Taiwan issue. The decision was made long ago and available openly and freely at many places.

    @knn is right. There is not need for UN to declare that Taiwan is part of China. UN does not have this kind of power. The decision by UN to replace the legitimate government of China from Taipei to Beijing is clear enough. Only western propaganda and their western sheep twist that clear decision to claim Taiwan as the 99th state of US.

    But you are zero understanding of UN, especially UNGA and UNSC. You simply swallow Western propaganda and vomit them all over the place. Shameful, very shameful and extremely shameful.

    Hahaha. Now you bracket intl courts? No, thats not what u say. So apologize or show us where the intl courts documents that settled Taiwan issue, tsk tsk….still lying .

    Lol. Now u Chinese Chauvinists smacking each other?!! (:

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • knn:

    SINGAROAR:
    @Good Joker
    PEACE PALACE IN THE HAGUE (NETHERLANDS)It has 15 judges who are chosen by the UN General Assembly and the Security Council.
    China is a member of the Security Council and is proposing new laws for its belt and road ventures. The Philippines won its case against China in a land dispute using the International Courts. At this point I am using VB’s question and ask “What school did you go to?” Your ignorance is showing…….!

    When you post, you must get your facts right. The Mediation Court in Hague is not the court of the UN. It is at best the same as our Mediation Court in Tanjong Pagar. In a mediation court, both parties must agree to media, both parties must agree to the appointment of judges.

    The Mediation Court that judged the Ppines/China case was one sided, they appointed their own judges, paid their own judges. Nothing to do with the UN judges. China did not agree to the mediation. China did not agree to the judges.

    Understand?

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • knn:

    SINGAROAR:
    Only a legitimately elected govt.can claim rights of an entire country.The PRC is not elected by the Chinese in mainland China Mao Zedong forced Communism unto the Chinese.Millions of Chinese were killed by the Communists.The brain washing by the Communists is so successful that there are so many Chinese even in Singapore supporting the Communists and not identify themselves with the legitimate govt. of China which is the ROC.It does not mean that just because the PRC calls Taiwan a province of the PRC, it actually is. Repeating a lie and using online IBs to convince the masses only shows that the PRC’s know that their claim is wrongful.Why would Xi spend millions of dollars trying to scare the ROC.The Chinese there were more concerned about the hot weather than the PRC’s military drill.

    In this post you sounded so childish. You need to re read what you said and ask yourself does it make any sense?

    Did anyone elect the King of Saudi Arabia, did anyone elect the Sultan of Brunei?How did they rule their countries? Did anyone elect the KMT. By the way, the ROC is Republic of China, the name of China then. The ruling party was KMT. No one elect a country like the ROC.

    Spend a little effort in what you are writing and don’t come out looking silly, childish and nonsensical. Don’t anyhow hantam. Tsk, tsk, tsk.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • xoxo:

    i am no military analyst or expert watcher but the way Biden Admin is going about the China-Taiwan ISSUE cannot but makes me conclude like U$A wants to *GO TO ANOTHER PROXY WAR *,this time against China like how it is with Russia via UKRAINE?
    i hope i am seriously wrong.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Western Sheep:

    Go read my original post.
    The brackets were there. You are the real LIAR.

    The more you try to get out of the hole you dig yourself in, the more ignorance you show. No mental ability to understand UN.

    Shameful. Real shameful. Extremely shameful.

    BK: Hahaha. Now you bracket intl courts? No, thats not what u say. So apologize or show us where the intl courts documents that settled Taiwan issue, tsk tsk….still lying .

    Lol. Now u Chinese Chauvinists smacking each other?!! (:

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Western Sheep:

    @knn, you are so kind to @singaroar.

    @singaroar, you don’t understand shit about what you write.

    Look at what the UN said when Beijing replaced Taiwan as the “only legitimate government of China.” You, screaming about international courts, are screaming nonsense. Everything you scream contradicts this UNGA resolution. You higher than UN?

    Chiang was kicked out of UN representation of China. Western sheep want to say Taiwan was kicked out of UN, and kicked out of China into 99th state of US. No such thing. China (including Taiwan) is still China. It is not in UN power to decide China territory.

    Blur Kuku can never understand this. Way over his brainwashed head.

    U.N. Resolution 2758 – Oct. 25 1971
    Source: Facts on File, 1971 p. 825

    On October 25, 1971, the UN General Assembly passed United Nations Resolution 2758 (XXVI) which stated that the People’s Republic of China is the only legitimate government of China. The resolution replaced the ROC with the PRC as a permanent member of the Security Council in the United Nations.

    Resolution on Admitting Peking

    Resolution 2758 (XXVI)

    THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY.

    Recalling the principles of the Charter of the United Nations.

    Considering the restoration of the lawful rights of the People’s Republic of China is essential both for the protection of the Charter of the United Nations and for the cause that the United Nations must serve under the Charter.

    Recognizing that the representatives of the Government of the People’s Republic of China are the only lawful representatives of China to the United Nations and that the People’s Republic of China is one of the five permanent members of the Security Council.

    Decides to restore all its rights to the People’s Republic of China and to recognize the representatives of its Government as the only legitimate representatives of China to the United Nations, and to expel forthwith the representatives of Chiang Kai-shek from the place which they unlawfully occupy at the United Nations and in all the organizations related to it.

    knn: In this post you sounded so childish. You need to re read what you said and ask yourself does it make any sense?

    Did anyone elect the King of Saudi Arabia, did anyone elect the Sultan of Brunei?How did they rule their countries? Did anyone elect the KMT. By the way, the ROC is Republic of China, the name of China then. The ruling party was KMT. No one elect a country like the ROC.

    Spend a little effort in what you are writing and don’t come out looking silly, childish and nonsensical. Don’t anyhow hantam. Tsk, tsk, tsk.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • knn:

    xoxo:
    i am no military analyst or expert watcher but the way Biden Admin is going about the China-Taiwan ISSUE cannot but makes me conclude like U$A wants to *GO TO ANOTHER PROXY WAR *,this time against China like how it is with Russia via UKRAINE?
    i hope i am seriously wrong.

    There is no way Taiwan would go the Ukraine way. Geography would not allow it. There is no country connected to Taiwan. China’s PLA is in full control of the western Pacific. No ship or aircraft can come near to Taiwan without being shot down or sunk.

    When China announces a unification by force, the Taiwanese military would conduct a coup to arrest Tsai and the DPP. Not a shot would be fired and Taiwan would reunite with China. The Taiwanese are not stupid and know that resistance is futile, is death in a very scale.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • BK:

    Lets establish the facts:

    1. The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS) was established by UNCLOS as an independent judicial body for adjudicating disputes over the interpretation and implementation of the UNCLOS treaty. You can find more information about ITLOS by visiting its website.

    The International Court of Justice (ICJ) and other courts and tribunals have also adjudicated disputes related to the Law of the Sea when these disputes fall outside the scope of UNCLOS.

    https://ask.un.org/faq/139237

    2. Philippines v. China (PCA case number 2013–19), also known as the South China Sea Arbitration,[1] was an arbitration case brought by the Republic of the Philippines against the People’s Republic of China (PRC) under Annex VII of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS, ratified by the Philippines in 1984 and by the PRC in 1996) concerning certain issues in the South China Sea, including the nine-dash line introduced by the Republic of China (Taiwan) since as early as 1947.[2][3][4] A tribunal of arbitrators appointed the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) as the registry for the proceedings.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philippines_v._China

    Thus, UNCLOS setup ITOS, and ITOS setup the PCA for Philippines vs China.

    Unlike USA , China did sign up to UNCLOS. But as I said many times, China like US never follow international laws.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • MarBowling:

    xoxo:
    October 12, 2022 at 9:16 am (Quote)
    i am no military analyst or expert watcher but the way Biden Admin is going about the China-Taiwan ISSUE cannot but makes me conclude like U$A wants to *GO TO ANOTHER PROXY WAR *,this time against China like how it is with Russia via UKRAINE?
    i hope i am seriously wrong.

    Response: THINK YOU ARE SERIOUSLY RIGHT!

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Pitch-forked Sinkies:

    knn: In this post you sounded so childish. You need to re read what you said and ask yourself does it make any sense?

    Did anyone elect the King of Saudi Arabia, did anyone elect the Sultan of Brunei?How did they rule their countries? Did anyone elect the KMT. By the way, the ROC is Republic of China, the name of China then. The ruling party was KMT. No one elect a country like the ROC.

    Spend a little effort in what you are writing and don’t come out looking silly, childish and nonsensical. Don’t anyhow hantam. Tsk, tsk, tsk.

    @ knn

    Keep the heat on.
    Just shows how naive and simpletons these sinkies are. No depth of intellectual acumen from reading their comments. You become like them after a few rounds.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • BK:

    Western Sheep:
    Go read my original post.
    The brackets were there. You are the real LIAR.

    The more you try to get out of the hole you dig yourself in, the more ignorance you show. No mental ability to understand UN.

    Shameful. Real shameful. Extremely shameful.

    Is it? Post it lor. Dont have again? Lol. Then u are liar lor.

    Ok, once again, where are the intl court documents that settled Taiwan issue? Check your ass maybe, there. (:

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Western Sheep:

    From your same source,
    The United Nations itself “doesn’t have a position on the legal and procedural merits of the case or on the disputed claims”, and on 12 July the Secretary-General “expressed his hope that the continued consultations on a Code of Conduct between ASEAN and China under the framework of the Declaration of the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea will lead to increased mutual understanding among all the parties.”[21]

    Clearly, even UN Secretary General has no trust in the sham case. hahaha.

    You talk so much about this case, shouldn’t you give both sides of the story?

    BK:
    Lets establish the facts:

    1. The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS) was established by UNCLOS as an independent judicial body for adjudicating disputes over the interpretation and implementation of the UNCLOS treaty. You can find more information about ITLOS by visiting its website.

    The International Court of Justice (ICJ) and other courts and tribunals have also adjudicated disputes related to the Law of the Sea when these disputes fall outside the scope of UNCLOS.

    https://ask.un.org/faq/139237

    2. Philippines v. China (PCA case number 2013–19), also known as the South China Sea Arbitration,[1] was an arbitration case brought by the Republic of the Philippines against the People’s Republic of China (PRC) under Annex VII of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS, ratified by the Philippines in 1984 and by the PRC in 1996) concerning certain issues in the South China Sea, including the nine-dash line introduced by the Republic of China (Taiwan) since as early as 1947.[2][3][4] A tribunal of arbitrators appointed the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) as the registry for the proceedings.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philippines_v._China

    Thus, UNCLOS setup ITOS, and ITOS setup the PCA for Philippines vs China.

    Unlike USA , China did sign up to UNCLOS. But as I said many times, China like US never follow international laws.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • SINGAROAR:

    By your own assertion, ROC was kicked out of the UN and the PRC took over the ROC ‘s seat in the UN.This means there are two countries.One is the PRC and the other whose seat was taken away and continues to remain as the ROC.Many countries continued to have relationship with the ROC. Today the ROC’s chips are sought after globally and countries are dealing directly with the ROC. No country is going through the PRC to trade with the ROC. Even our own govt.has been dealing directly with the ROC in using the ROC to train our armed forces.It is the PRC which puts pressure on other countries claiming that the ROC is a province in its own land mass.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • SINGAROAR:

    @knn
    Do you really think that the war is going to be only in the Taiwan Straits?In WW2 the British were waiting for the Japanese to invade by sea and had their weapons pointed in that direction.As history has shown,the Japanese came through Malaya.China has a huge land mass.It has an extremely long border.The minute the PRC declares war,it opens itself for land distribution.The British may take back Hong Kong.The Japanese will have their own claims.Tibet, with the help of India may remove itself from the PRC.Why do you think the Taiwanese are worried more about a heat wave than the PRC’s military drills?

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Western Sheep:

    You are hopeless. Must have failed all your English classes in school.

    SINGAROAR:
    By your own assertion, ROC was kicked out of the UN and the PRC took over the ROC ‘s seat in the UN.This means there are two countries.One is the PRC and the other whose seat was taken away and continues to remain as the ROC.Many countries continued to have relationship with the ROC. Today the ROC’s chips are sought after globally and countries are dealing directly with the ROC. No country is going through the PRC to trade with the ROC. Even our own govt.has been dealing directly with the ROC in using the ROC to train our armed forces.It is the PRC which puts pressure on other countries claiming that the ROC is a province in its own land mass.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Western Sheep:

    You prove once again that you cannot understand the document when it is right in front of you. You are as hopeless as @singa. Two Blur Kukus.

    You don’t understand what is the Taiwan issue. So you talk nonsense! Sibei shameful.

    BK: Is it? Post it lor. Dont have again? Lol. Then u are liar lor.

    Ok, once again, where are the intl court documents that settled Taiwan issue? Check your ass maybe, there. (:

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Apologies to Sheep:
    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • BK:

    Lol. Is no position means no trust? Did he sack the ppl at ITLOS? No?

    Thus again, UNCLOS to ITLOS to PCA, the chain of procedure within the framework of UNCLOS. Did u even know this until now? U seem clueless about everything.

    U even think 45 mio Chinese killed is nothing but just a huge mistake. Quick sick person.

    Again, where is your original post? Dont have?

    Again, where are the documents that intl courts settled Taiwan issue? Dont have?

    Thats my point, u are all empty , in every sense (:

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Western Sheep:

    Every item you raise is so stewpig. Just take your first item. You think the UN Sec-Gen is so powerful can sack people so easily? Stewpig or not?

    BK: Lol. Is no position means no trust? Did he sack the ppl at ITLOS? No?

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • knn:

    BK:
    Lets establish the facts:

    1. The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS) was established by UNCLOS as an independent judicial body for adjudicating disputes over the interpretation and implementation of the UNCLOS treaty. You can find more information about ITLOS by visiting its website.

    The International Court of Justice (ICJ) and other courts and tribunals have also adjudicated disputes related to the Law of the Sea when these disputes fall outside the scope of UNCLOS.

    https://ask.un.org/faq/139237

    2. Philippines v. China (PCA case number 2013–19), also known as the South China Sea Arbitration,[1] was an arbitration case brought by the Republic of the Philippines against the People’s Republic of China (PRC) under Annex VII of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS, ratified by the Philippines in 1984 and by the PRC in 1996) concerning certain issues in the South China Sea, including the nine-dash line introduced by the Republic of China (Taiwan) since as early as 1947.[2][3][4] A tribunal of arbitrators appointed the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) as the registry for the proceedings.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philippines_v._China

    Thus, UNCLOS setup ITOS, and ITOS setup the PCA for Philippines vs China.

    Unlike USA , China did sign up to UNCLOS. But as I said many times, China like US never follow international laws.

    Blur King, why conveniently missed out what is important in this case?
    1. When China became a signatory of UNCLOS, it specifically exclude itself from any disputes on territorial claim.
    ‘The Philippines’ arbitration relates to the dispute over the sovereignty of islands and reefs in the South China Sea, and to maritime delimitation. But these territorial issues are not regulated by — and therefore beyond the scope of — the U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). And in 2006, China declared it would exclude “disputes concerning maritime delimitation” from compulsory arbitration, under Article 298 of UNCLOS.’

    2. A dispute between two parties can only be heard if both parties agreed to arbitration.
    ‘Article 1
    1. Where a State, State-controlled entity, or intergovernmental organization has agreed with one or
    more States, State-controlled entities, intergovernmental organizations, or private parties that
    disputes between them in respect of a defined legal relationship, whether contractual, treaty based, or otherwise, shall be referred to arbitration under the Permanent Court of Arbitration
    Arbitration Rules 2012 (hereinafter the “Rules”), then such disputes shall be settled in accordance
    with these Rules subject to such modification as the parties may agree.’

    Read the above and stop throwing smokes around to con the readers

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • knn:

    SINGAROAR:
    @knn
    Do you really think that the war is going to be only in the Taiwan Straits?In WW2 the British were waiting for the Japanese to invade by sea and had their weapons pointed in that direction.As history has shown,the Japanese came through Malaya.China has a huge land mass.It has an extremely long border.The minute the PRC declares war,it opens itself for land distribution.The British may take back Hong Kong.The Japanese will have their own claims.Tibet, with the help of India may remove itself from the PRC.Why do you think the Taiwanese are worried more about a heat wave than the PRC’s military drills?

    Western Sheep:
    You are hopeless. Must have failed all your English classes in school.

    I fully agree with Western Sheep that you are hopeless. Your roar is like the squeaking of a mouse. What is Britain or Japan today versus China? Even the USA would not win a war against China today. Forget about the pretentious India. The 2 limping British aircraft carriers would be sitting ducks in the South China Sea. Japan would be the first to be vaporised when a war starts.

    Hey, this is 2022, not the 19th century. 60 years ago you were a child, now you are an old man. Things changed. You need to face reality.

    And there is only one China. PRC is China, ROC is also China under the KMT government. There cannot be two Chinas, two countries. You can call yourself singaroar or mousesqueak, but still you, one you.

    Is that too difficult to understand? heheheheheh. Try harder.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • SINGAROAR:

    @knn
    If the PRC was confident in using military force against the ROC, it would not be taking 7 decades and would not need yourself or Western Sheep to do propaganda of its might. The “mighty”Russia are in 8 months of war in Ukraine after saying it would be a 3 day war. The Russians are more experienced than the PRC in warfare.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • BK:

    Lol. 2 Talking cocks are definitely more stupid than one.

    1 “The Philippines was justified in calling an ad-hoc tribunal since neither country opted for a specific type of dispute resolution when they adopted UNCLOS. The Court also found that China’s non-participation did not impact the PCA’s jurisdiction because Annex VII Art. 9 states that,

    “Absence of a party or failure of a party to defend its case shall not constitute a bar to the proceedings.”

    They also cited ways in which the PCA protected China’s rights, including repeated invitations to comment on procedural steps, advance notice for hearings, transcripts, and an invitation to join formally at any stage. The Court similarly argued that Vietnam’s non-participation didn’t impact the PCA’s jurisdiction despite the fact that it has rival claims to the same region.”

    Now, it is established that UNCLOS to ITLOS to PCA, these are the facts, a proper chain leading to UNCLOS.

    2. “In response to China’s rejection of the statement of claim, the Philippines stated that the arbitration would proceed and that the 5-member arbitration panel would be formed with or without China.

    Presumably, the Philippines had in mind the procedure set out in Article 3 of Annex VII. The provisions on the appointment of arbitrators provide that China has 30 days from receipt of the statement of claim to appoint one member to the tribunal, and that if the appointment is not made within that period, the Philippines may, within two weeks of the expiration of that period, request that the appointment be made by the President of ITLOS in accordance with subparagraph (e) of Article 3.

    Article 3(e) requires the ITLOS President to make such an appointment from a list of arbitrators maintained by the UN Secretary-General within 30 days of the receipt of the request and in consultation with the parties. The Department of Foreign Affairs of the Philippines confirmed on Monday 25 March 2013 that they had made such a request to the President of ITLOS, Judge Yanai, and that he has appointed Judge Stanislaw Pawlak (Poland) as an arbitrator on behalf of China.”

    Repeat: ITLOS President to make such an appointment from a list of arbitrators maintained by the UN Secretary-General

    Thus, Annex VII Art. 9 allows for such an arrangement whereby China in its fear to lose a case refuses to participate.

    UNCLOS enpowers ITLOS to act with the list provided for by the UN secrrtariat. PCA setup within the framework of UNCLOS, and Philippines won the case.

    Which part u didnt understand? (:

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • BK:

    How Eunuch? No documents for Intl courts settled Taiwan or original post? Why everything u say is a lie?

    Tsk tsk..

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Western Sheep:

    Which part do you understand? China already made it’s response on this, long ago.

    You claim to be neutral. Please include China response in your comments lah. Without that, you are just vomi…, eh, repeating one sided arguments. No point.

    BK:

    Which part u didnt understand? (:

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • BK:

    Btw, Talking Cock number 1, u do know the paper you quoted specifically said:

    “The following paper is set out with a limited scope. Its main focus is to review the decision of the Tribunal on jurisdiction and admissibility in the light of the reservations of China. It goes without saying that issues on merits of the dispute between China and the Philippines are outside the purview of this paper, even if the treatment of the subject matter sometimes makes it opportune to glance at them.”

    So u are quoting a paper that says : It goes without saying that issues on merits of the dispute between China and the Philippines are outside the purview of this paper….

    Why did u leave that out? Lol. Who is smoking? Damn cock…u guys never dare to leave links coz your cases loophole bigger than elephant ass. Tsk tsk….

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • BK:

    Ok. Im neutral, I just think u guys are liars. Just to expose u (:

    Example: There is a car accident. There is a death. One claims insurance coz the dead has history of heart attack. The other claims insurance based on car accident.

    Lets say, UNCLOS is insurance for car accident. U guys keep saying is not UN related, I showed u how it is linked. Still fxcking argue.

    Philippines claim is right under UNCLOS, UNCLOS dont deal with insurance of heart attack period. Barking up the wrong fxxking tree.

    Now China claims under historical rights. They say claim under history of heart attack. But China has never brought the evidence before any courts.

    So, simple, have evidence take it to court. Get it?

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Western Sheep:

    Blur kukus getting worse and worse. Randomly posting “laughable-svowp”.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • knn:

    BK:
    Lol. 2 Talking cocks are definitely more stupid than one.

    1 “The Philippines was justified in calling an ad-hoc tribunal since neither country opted for a specific type of dispute resolution when they adopted UNCLOS. The Court also found that China’s non-participation did not impact the PCA’s jurisdiction because Annex VII Art. 9 states that,

    “Absence of a party or failure of a party to defend its case shall not constitute a bar to the proceedings.”

    They also cited ways in which the PCA protected China’s rights, including repeated invitations to comment on procedural steps, advance notice for hearings, transcripts, and an invitation to join formally at any stage. The Court similarly argued that Vietnam’s non-participation didn’t impact the PCA’s jurisdiction despite the fact that it has rival claims to the same region.”

    Now, it is established that UNCLOS to ITLOS to PCA, these are the facts, a proper chain leading to UNCLOS.

    2. “In response to China’s rejection of the statement of claim, the Philippines stated that the arbitration would proceed and that the 5-member arbitration panel would be formed with or without China. ….

    Thus, Annex VII Art. 9 allows for such an arrangement whereby China in its fear to lose a case refuses to participate.

    UNCLOS enpowers ITLOS to act with the list provided for by the UN secrrtariat. PCA setup within the framework of UNCLOS, and Philippines won the case.

    Which part u didnt understand? (:

    Blur King, stop acting blur lah. The first post, both parties must agree to arbitrate is the first consideration. Without this, the rest is irrelevant. Period. It is like a child must be born first. If the child is not born, all the vaccination, how to vaccinate, how many vaccination etc etc would not count any more.

    The more important condition is the arbitration on territorial disputes. China accepts UMCLOS on the condition of no territorial claims. This is specifically excluded. Understand or not?

    Still argue about what? The first post also cannot cross and want to jump to the rest. Go and ask your legal friends lah. The basic principles, you cannot go to arbitrate without consent of both parties, and both parties must agree on the appointment of judges. In this case the Ppines is acting like the judge, jury and executor, appoint and pay their judges to just in their favour in the absence of the other party. Only no brain dafts can accept this as fair judgement. A court is meant to be fair and neutral, not one sided.

    Sigh. Still pretending to be a reasonable man with some ability to think rationally. Blur King is the right title for you.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • BK:

    Lol. 2 lovebirds Talking cock and singing song. No wonder u guys can create imaginary courts.

    No more quotes, no more links? Just spilling gibberish. Hahaha…(:

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • knn:

    BK:
    Lol. 2 lovebirds Talking cock and singing song. No wonder u guys can create imaginary courts.

    No more quotes, no more links? Just spilling gibberish. Hahaha…(:

    “Hahaha…(:” What does this mean?
    苦笑, meaning so painful, want to laugh also cannot but forced to laugh.
    We understand. It is very hurting to be demolished in front of everyone.

    But what do you expect, when all you quoted were so contrived and so skewed to make a false case to be appear to be true?

    Hahahahhahahaha. This is real laughter.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • BK:

    Really? (: Hahaha

    GD Star Rating
    loading...

Leave a Reply

 characters available


Scroll Down For More Interesting Stuff


Member Services
Self-SupportMembers LoginSelf-Support
Sponsored Advertisement
Search On TR Emeritus
Sponsored Advertisement
Announcement
Advertisements
Visitors Statistic
Latest Statistic

UA-67043412-1