Will Potong Pasir SMC’s electoral boundaries be changed due to gerrymandering?

Singapore’s political landscape has always been an interesting one. We are perhaps the only country that has retained one party rule within the trappings of a technical democracy. While detractors would criticise Singapore as authoritarian, proponents would point at the “rags to riches” story that transformed Singapore from cultural backwater to a first world city. Is that really true though? Was Singapore really a cultural backwater? With its excellent geographical location, was it just down to the excellent management of the People’s Action Party that led to its development? If Singapore was such a cultural backwater, why did the British want it so? I leave this for the reader to think about.

Even if we give the PAP the credit for its excellent management of Singapore, that crop of PAP leaders that brought us to this point are already gone. Do the new crop of leaders deserve to be in power just because they are part of the ruling system?

The PAP has long been accused of suppressing opposition politicians through the law. Instead of jailing critics like out and out totalitarian regimes, it has been accused of using the legal route (through the dreaded “made to measure” defamation suit) to crush the opposition.  Softer and less obvious methods have also been observed by some through the creation of the Group Representation Constituency (GRC).

The official reason for the creation of the GRC is to ensure that minorities are represented and one cannot help but notice that the same reason has been cited for changing the rules of the elected presidency. The collateral result of such minority representation is that opposition parties would struggle to field the requisite number of candidates. Re the presidency, it led to the inability of one rather prominent ex-PAP member to contest, leading to the uncontested assent of Madam Halimah.

And through the legal contest by Singapore Democratic Party on the need for by-election, we now know that the stance of the PAP govt is that the GRC is only meant to have representative candidacy during an election and not during the term of office. This was said by Deputy Attorney General, Hri Kumar in the High Court in defence of the government, that there is no need to hold a by-election as the constituency is still cared for by three Chinese MPs. With that, one could argue that minority representation is a cover reason for the changes and that the real reason was to make it harder for the opposition to win.

Veteran journalist and politician Jose Raymond recently announced that he had pared down his other commitments in order to focus on his grassroots activities. A quick look at his social media activity would confirm this. This man has indeed been busy getting to know the residents within Potong Pasir, the Single Member Constituency (SMC) he is rumoured to be interested in contesting for in the the next general election. His efforts were made despite the knowledge that the government can easily change the electoral lines to dilute his support. The government has done this in the past. Of course the official reason has never been to manipulate support but one can speculate.

Raymond has been tireless in his efforts and despite not having the army of support that incumbent Sitoh Yih Pin has, made considerable headway in getting to know the residents. If social media activity is to be believed, Mr Raymond has been far more committed than Mr Sitoh. Perhaps Mr Raymond has more time since he has decided to focus on this full time. Mr Sitoh still runs his own accountancy firm and sits on the board of a number of companies. Should elected MPs be permitted to have other jobs especially in light of a potential opposition challenger showing his dedication by committing full time even before the general election is even announced?

I hope Potong Pasir will remain unchanged especially since any change in electoral boundaries will only confirm to detractors that there really is gerrymandering even if that is not the intention.


by Ghui



Sponsored Content

6 Responses to “Will Potong Pasir SMC’s electoral boundaries be changed due to gerrymandering?”

  • dying clown pap and S$m gang:

    actually it doesn’t matter since clown pap and S$m gang are going to run road after GE2019.

    many say SDP coalition effort too little too late in kiasi kiasu Singapore.

    we disagree. it is precisely kiasi kiasu then got chance.

    so whether PP smc exists or not GE2019 doesn’t matter.

    MORE important is for coalition to form now, today, and everyone focused on its trouncing of clown pap and S$m gang in a few months’ time, GE2019.

    GD Star Rating
  • Bapak:

    If Sinkies don’t stop this gerrymandering, it will be only ONE GRC for the whole country. No need election anymore – Emperor State.

    GD Star Rating
  • Raft wee:

    Potong pasir town council is no more, it’s under Jalan besar town council….what do you think?

    GD Star Rating
  • HarderTruths:

    This is just a side issue. Does not change the fact that 70% of ballsless and selfish voters want the pappy saga to continue – thinking as long as they themselves have not affected it does not matter.

    This is typical $G mentality. Even after all the hard work by the opposition.

    Remember $G is not special. A failed state or economy can happen tomorrow with all the usual clowns running this circus.

    GD Star Rating
  • Theng Sor Hai:

    Cultural backwater is a nice way to put it. Philistines is a more apt term to describe many sporeans. No appreciation for arts, design etc. Main focus on money and whats “practical”.But they like to act/talk smart, knowledgeable, sophisticated.

    GD Star Rating
  • oute:

    Go for the bigger cake… the GRC as Plan B

    GD Star Rating

Leave a Reply

 characters available

Member Services
Members LoginSelf-ClassifiedsSelf-Support
Sponsored Advertisement

Search On TR Emeritus
Sponsored Advertisement

Most Recent Comments
  • loud hailer chee: HarderTruths: I had a lot of hope at one time when JBJ was in Parliament. All that vanished after...
  • HarderTruths: only 1 law – all for one and more for me.
  • PA - Close it Down!: In the last few years, the Auditor General Office has continuously flagged...
  • LIONS: We take it as NORM if a young upstart Aristocrap is allowed to further his *personal interest* by pursuing...
  • Sylvia said it in Parliament!: But no one dared answered her question! Parliament is KING! If you want to be heard,...
  • LIONS: Oftentimes,the PEOPLE’S ASSOCIATION confuses itself as The PAPple Association??? GROs in OPPO WARDS shud...
  • LIONS: Ya,ya,in $in City,No One is above the Law except Pig$?
  • Perspective: Lets be fair: Quite difficult. Many here always parrot Ang Mo Da Kee, if Mindef make...
  • Crooked PAP and PA: PA budget per year stands at staggering $1b. There is only ONE reason for PA to have so much...
  • Perspective: Equality Was Stealth ily Remove: Schooling was given deferment. Why not this guy? Also,...
  • oxygen: @ GetaLife YOU MUST BE A STUPID SAMPLE IN A CLASS OF YOUR OWN. Suicide is crime. How can insurance pay money...
Visitors Statistic
Latest Statistic