Meritocracy works: Really?

I refer to the article “Meritocracy still the best model, says Ong Ye Kung” (Straits Times, Oct 25).

It states that “”Ten years ago, about 20 per cent of our employed households had an income of $3,000 or less… Today, this has gone down to well below 15 per cent. But that also means that the smaller group of families that continue to remain poor are facing more difficult challenges.”

Mr Ong stressed the need to recognise this fundamental point – that these challenges have arisen not from meritocracy’s failure, but from its success. “So, let us not discard meritocracy, for I don’t think it has finished running its useful course.”

As we have been granting on the average about 200,000 new citizens and 300,000 new PRs in the last decade or so – and generally, PRs earn more than Singaporeans – does it correspondingly mean that PR and new citizen households added to the population, also earn more than true-blue Singaporean households?

If so, if we account for such new households – has our $3,000 income households really decreased from 20 to 15% in the last decade?

Also, since the data cited is for employed resident (Singaporeans and PRs) households, and the unemployment rate of Singaporeans is higher than PRs – why not give the dara for employed and unemployed Singaporean households combined, instead of resident households?

In this connection, “the HDB has ramped up the rental flat supply from 42,000 units in 2007 to 53,500, with an aim to boost this to 60,000 by next year (2017)”.

% of HDB 1 & 2 -room flats increase every year?

I also understand that the percentage share of HDB 1 & 2-room flats is at its highest in about  12 years (2005 – 2017), at about 6 per cent (increasing gradually every year from the low of 3.9 per cent in 2008).

Looking at the above statistics – is meritocracy working well in Singapore?

 

Leong Sze Hian

 

 

Sponsored Content

8 Responses to “Meritocracy works: Really?”

  • N.Jungne:

    What Ong says, carry no weight at all. Equivalent to what the Cantonese says “tong ngup fung” (nonsense)

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • PAPi is all the bad news:

    Percentage Employed households because many have lost their jobs and become unemployed and not accounted for in the Percentage.

    Nowadays, I doubt whatever the PAPi want to say.

    All prices hike and still increases some more.

    PAPi is all the bad news. Today news, public transport fares hike “AGAIN!”.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • LIONS:

    DONT WORRY,PAP MINISTERS N THEIR DOGGIES HAVE GOTTEN RID OF REAL LOCAL TALENTS.
    NOW,the ‘MERITOCRATIC’ PIG$ CAN FEEL AT EASE,THERE ARE ONLY FTs – fake talents – left???….easy meat,no cowpeh cowboo.

    national productivity low,why bother.
    so ‘loong’ as there is SOCIAL MOBILITY????

    THIS CHAP IS A CLOWN,TRIPLE-CONFIRMED,he doesnt know wtf he is talking about!

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Bad Boy:

    武侠小说泰斗金庸逝世 享年94岁
    https://c.m.163.com/news/a/DVCV3HJ600038FO9.html?spss=newsapp

    My respect to sir 金庸. Salute!

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Nation Of Dumb Parrots:

    How can a chosen few who shield themselves from accountability and failure be real meritocracy?? What merit or experience have they got to pay themselves obscenely?
    PAP likes to masquerade their greed and talk meritocracy because dafts will parrot it dutifully without thinking.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Only One Important Rule:

    Kick the PAP out.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Meritocracy works?:

    Meritocracy works?
    If it does, most of us ordinary folk have not ‘felt’ it!

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • New meritocracy:

    Ong YK should be given time to reset and redefine meritocracy in today’s environment and conditions.
    He should be credited for stepping out and think out of the box. A first amongst them to take a relook into the archaic approach about meritocracy of the past.
    Give him time to work on it and convince his team.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...

Leave a Reply

 characters available

Member Services
Members LoginSelf-ClassifiedsSelf-Support
Sponsored Advertisement

Search On TR Emeritus
Sponsored Advertisement


Most Recent Comments
  • Not So Angry Rooster: LOL, TRE also great joker. Where the hell get this photo of him? Look like cheekopek uncle...
  • Angry Rooster: This is to make sure these cleaners vote for them. But after that GST take back 150%. Both way also...
  • Bapak: I seem like lately all PAP policies are to give you hope and delay rewards. Is this their strategy to keep...
  • Bapak: There are more than 40,000 cleaners employed by over 1300 cleaning firms here. Come 2020, how many of our...
  • sute: Employers will sack the cleaner just before 1 year tenure to save on the bonus payment. Don’t think this...
  • Bapak: I told my staff company will give them 50% pay increase and on top of that a 6-month special...
  • Wayang is upincriminating: No matter how many photos of local papic mps or ministers visiting the wet market food...
  • Fakes or Truths depending on .: Fakes n truths by definition are definite not depending on any factor. But the modern...
  • Shit commenting on shits huh!: Isn’t this B who slapped Amos in front of the Sub Court ? Even if isn’t...
  • Degenerating versions: The degenerating pap version began to show its stress in v4 by the internal strive locked in...
  • oxygen: @ Shiro GEOPOLITICAL SHIFTS OF TWO NEARLY EQUAL ECONOMIC/POLITICAL ENTITIES takes decades to settle to...
Announcements
Advertisement
Visitors Statistic
Latest Statistic
Advertisements