Debunking the Brexiters’ Dreams of ‘Singapore-On-Thames’

Hardly a day goes by without a tweet or sound-bite from a UK Tory politician, businessman or right-wing commentator (Daniel Hannam, Jacob Rees-Mogg and James Dyson, to name just a few) claiming that all the UK needs to do is turn itself into Singapore-upon-Thames to emulate its economic success. Martin Wolf, a veteran economics journalist from the Financial Times, wrote an excellent article but even so mamages to make basic mistakes preventing a like for like comparison by omitting key factors and gives far to much deference to the superiority of authoritarianism.

These first fundamental error he makes is to compare Singapore’s GDP per capita at purchasing-power-parity with that of the UK as a measure of its success. A more appropriate comparison would be with London since Singapore is a relatively small city by global standards and 100% urbanised. Also PPP is a difficult measure giv According to Eurostat, the GDP per capita at current prices of Inner London West was Euros 213,000 (US$236,000 at the prevailing exchange rate) and that of London as a whole was Euros 67,500 (about US$75,000) in 2015. In 2015 Singapore’s GDP per capita at constant prices was US$55,000.

Even if we forget the city comparisons and only use country ones then the closest national comparison is with Ireland. Ireland has about the same size population and pursues similar policies of low tax rates (though only for corporations; Ireland’s highest personal tax rate at 40% is close to twice that of Singapore’s) and openness to foreign investment. Both countries use low tax rates to encourage MNCs to move their HQs and intellectual property and book their revenues and profits locally, thus artificially inflating their GDP per capita way beyond what the average standard of living in those countries would suggest.

 

For instance Dublin ranks 14th in UBS’s survey of Prices and Earnings in Global Cities 2018 on real net hourly pay while the three biggest US cities and many European ones are much higher (London ranks in 25th place). Singapore was included in the first survey 2011 but the comparison was so unfavourable, putting Singaporeans workers on a par with those in Kuala Lumpur or Moscow, that the Singapore Government clearly put pressure on UBS, through its sovereign wealth funds GIC and Temasek, to drop Singapore from subsequent surveys.

Singapore’s relatively high GDP per capita is also inflated by the fact that the ratio of the employed workforce to total population is much higher than average due to the large numbers of guest workers without dependents (who get sent home the minute they lose their jobs) as well as the longest working hours in the developed world. Looking at GDP per hour worked as calculated by the US Conference Board puts Singapore well below the US and below many of the major European economies (France, Germany, the Netherlands, Scandinavia though not the UK)

The Irish example provides an easy refutation of the argument that the UK needs to leave the EU to emulate the Singapore model. And it also refutes Martin Wolf’s uncritical acceptance of the benefits of authoritarian rule:

the reliability of Singapore’s “offer” to the world is underpinned by the fact that just one highly competent governing party has ruled it throughout its history as an independent country.

Singapore has probably grown no faster than most major global cities and has the advantage of a far superior strategic location than Ireland. In fact Brookings Global Metro Monitor 2018 put Singapore at 204th out of 300 of the leading global cities for economic performance for 2014-2016. Dublin ranked as No. 1 on the list.

Wolf says a complementary explanation for Singapore’s rapid growth is its high investment and savings rate, particularly its government surplus and the CPF forced savings fund. His figure for the government surplus is far too low since it excludes the surpluses generated by the sovereign wealth funds and other government entities. The true surplus as a percentage of GDP could be almost double that but the truth is that nobody knows since the Government ensures that information is kept secret, including the true size of the reserves which should certainly include an estimate of the value of the 80% or so of the land that it owns.

To suggest the UK should try to save over 40% of its GDP is patently absurd as the Government would immediately plunge the economy into a deep depression. The reason Singapore is able to do so is because it runs a corresponding surplus of around 10% of GDP on its current account which offsets the high savings rate. For the UK to generate such a large current account surplus would require levels of austerity that have not been experienced even in the Thatcher years. Adoption of similar mercantilist policies would be immediately attacked by the US just as it attacks China, Germany, South Korea and Japan for doing the same thing. Singapore gets away with it because its economy is much smaller and it takes care to run a trade deficit with the US by purchasing large quantities of the most expensive American armaments.

The reason Singapore’s growth rate has historically been so high is not because of any productivity miracle brought about by high investment rates. Productivity growth has been mediocre for most of the last twenty years and below countries like the US which invest less than half as much as a proportion of GDP. The reason is left unstated by Brexiters but is due to the fact that until very recently it was very easy for employers to bring in cheap labour from much poorer Asian countries. In the absence of a minimum wage and other labour protections that UK workers take for granted, this has depressed wages for unskilled labour well below those in the UK and below what they used to be historically in Singapore. Foreign labour now constitutes almost 50% of the workforce. The people who voted for Brexit did so in part because of the influx of cheaper labour from Eastern Europe which they believed had depressed wages. Yet the amounts of immigration from Eastern Europe into the UK have been much smaller as a proportion of the total UK population than the influx of foreign workers in Singapore has been of the Singapore population which has doubled in twenty years. Coupled with the fact that Singaporeans are only really free to invest their CPF savings in property (which for 90% of the population the only option is overpriced and leasehold public housing) this has driven up property prices, enriched the Government as the biggest property owner and monopoly housebuilder but lift Singaporeans overpaying for a depreciating asset.

Wolf is right to say that Singapore is not a realistic model for post-Brexit Britain but he is wrong to suggest that the model has desirable features that Britain should seek to emulate. And in the process he comes uncomfortably close to being an enthusiastic supporter of totalitarianism. There is nothing “complex and nuanced” about dictatorship.

 

Kenneth Jeyaretnam

* The author blogs at https://kenjeyaretnam.com/.

 

 

Sponsored Content

12 Responses to “Debunking the Brexiters’ Dreams of ‘Singapore-On-Thames’”

  • Sg is resource poor. haha:

    ” nobody knows since the Government ensures that information is kept secret, including the true size of the reserves which should certainly include an estimate of the value of the 80% or so of the land that it owns.”

    To this day, there are ministers who should know better and ignorant common folks who claim that Singapore is resource poor.

    In President Ong’s days, it took 56 man-years just to list the properties owned by the government. Today, it probably will take 300 woman-years for the President to read through the list (if there is one).

    Singapore is so rich that it can continue normal government operations forever even if it stops all taxes. Don’t believe? Just open up all the books in GIC/TH/MAS/SLA/everywhere.

    GD Star Rating
    a WordPress rating system
  • oxygen:

    KJ,Lim Hnn Kiang said we can’t be a first world economy paying third world wages.

    Our GDP per capita is FAKE – it is attributable to FOREIGN INVESTORS’s gain or benefit. So Martin Wolf et al is talking cawked of GDP per capita comparison to LEE-jiapore. Is UK accepting Chinese investment paying Shenzhen wages to keep up the GDP per capita facade of smoke and mirror?

    Singapore’s GDP capita is bloated given its small population base of city state and the influx of foreign capital. That productive investment is dying. Foreign labor influx is UNSUSTAINABLE of social/amenities particularly infrastructural costs which must be borne by incumbent population of higher tax and its disguised taxation like delayed CPF withdrawal – ignoring stagnating wages aggravated by runaway costs of living escalations. It is jobless or with falling wages buffeted by inflation if we add in foreign labor influx.

    Singapore model of asset bubble fake economy has peaked . We hit the glass ceiling about to fall back to the floor of reality and death. Present Tense said we MAXED OUT in 2015.

    Brexiters wants to imitate us?

    GD Star Rating
    a WordPress rating system
  • RDB:

    Isn’t Sg an obvious dictatorship “miracle”. Meaning with an electorate that consistently vote for a it. To then complain of the govt they voted endlessly. A foolish electorate will vote for a dumbass jackass gagament like that.

    GD Star Rating
    a WordPress rating system
  • never happen!:

    if they ever adopt the sg methods , their people will riot and kick out the gov quicker than u can say “god save the queen”.
    dont worry..britzens arent sheeple like in sinkingpore.
    it’ll never happen i dare say.

    GD Star Rating
    a WordPress rating system
  • The brick is not the house:

    Holyoake was trying to sell his house, but without success.

    One day he pulled out a brick from the wall of his house.

    “Why did you do that?” asked his wife, appalled.

    “Oh, foolish woman, what do you know?!” replied Holyoake. “To sell anything, you have to show a sample. I propose to show this brick as a sample of our house, can’t you see?”

    GD Star Rating
    a WordPress rating system
  • patriot of TUMASIK:

    As I see it ‘The BULLSHIT’ will Never End…thank you Ken it is people with TRUE grey matter and intellect that will show the TRUTH and tell it as it is…

    A Big Mouth lEEgal bast**d will twist & turn and in the process turn a Lie into his HardTruth

    Singapore is No bigger than Jerusalem the City and its Metropole and it spends Billions on Defense…how MUCH BULL do you need to CONvince the people to believe that we are under siege???

    All the BULL & SHIT that was spent to put the sheep in their pen and the Horses & Cows to work as slaves while the Dogs will Bark & Attack on Command by the Pigs now walking on Two legs Snorting we are AristoCRAPS and 4 legs are good but 2 legs are Better while wallowing in their Glass Towers

    GD Star Rating
    a WordPress rating system
  • LIONS:

    Hahaha,emulate Sin City model,then UK will be in total disaster.
    Different culture,EVEN MORE DIFFERENT PEOPLE?

    The Brits might as well emulate CHINA?

    GD Star Rating
    a WordPress rating system
  • if the truth be told:

    if they, only knew the real truths.
    everything is fake.
    a superficial no soul country is our SG.

    GD Star Rating
    a WordPress rating system
  • Brit Bigots:

    Emulate a former ‘slave’? Brit are racist d*gs; look at how they denigrate Singaporeans in MRT? and beating up Taxi-drivers. More like trying to revive their commonwealth empire. Let them rots after Brexit. Don’t even allow them to come back here!

    LIONS:
    Hahaha,emulate Sin City model,then UK will be in total disaster.
    Different culture,EVEN MORE DIFFERENT PEOPLE?

    The Brits might as well emulate CHINA?

    GD Star Rating
    a WordPress rating system
  • Dafts Will Be Dafts:

    Singapore is just a convenient example as an argument.
    It would be foolish to read too much into it.

    GD Star Rating
    a WordPress rating system
  • Hagen Diaz:

    “Brexit” and the ensuing circus-like atmosphere which has led to the division and polarization of British society is the definition of a self-inflicted wound. It was and is, an impulsive, ill-conceived exercise in futility, punctuated by the profound misunderstanding of the British public as to its ramifications and long-term consequences.

    “Brexit” also underscores what happens when you have a badly informed population and a politically inactive, disconnected and disenfranchised citizenry.

    It looks like Britain will have to play by EU rules without any input if they want a trade deal which will be less favourable than the one they have now. The ramifications of Brexit are not only economic. They are political as well. Those who excoriate May’s plan offer no solutions to the Irish border issue, e.g., or any other concrete proposals as to how the political challenges are going to be addressed.

    GD Star Rating
    a WordPress rating system
  • Brilliant:

    A well written piece Ken;it is spore’s Loss that you are notin parliament as a mp
    It puts to shame our ministers who studied ECONs ontax payors money like apparatchik n the stupid boy

    GD Star Rating
    a WordPress rating system

Leave a Reply

 characters available

Member Services
Self-SupportMembers Login
Sponsored Advertisement

Search On TR Emeritus
Sponsored Advertisement



Most Recent Comments
  • rukidding: IMHO,…only “crooked” Leeders “behaves” like what you just posted ! Period !...
  • N.Jungne: Last time close friend, now no money to borrow, no friend. Don’t know meh
  • opposition dude: You know what ST will tell us? Something like the following below to make it sound like it’s...
  • fly me to the moon: Sg BASHING CONtinues,this time whacking a company n CEO they sang praises. Guess taking advantage...
  • fly me to the moon: This guy says cannot spend too much on healthcare or BURDEN TO TAXPAYER? From a guy who never...
  • Vignesh Moorthy: I’m a blood donor and I know that blood is never sold. Don’t spread false messages. Read and do your...
  • Freshest Air: Even the polluted water and air are 100% toxic, they will say Punggol has the freshest air and tranquil...
  • NotMyProblem: @Mr. Goh; why are you worry about the interest of Hyflux? PUB should take over Tuas Spring excluding...
  • can we report CI to police?: since GE2019 is soon, pap PA paid IBs are out in full force. when a topic looks...
  • PC Ong: Please lah, Goh Meng Seng pride himself on economics but he can’t even understand simple...
  • what you saying?: Hey, I don’t think the PM is watching, he may be sleeping like the literally empty parliament...
Announcements
Advertisement
Visitors Statistic
Latest Statistic
Advertisements