Statement of Concern Regarding Sexual Harassment at the National University of Singapore

Dear President Prof Tan Eng Chye, Senior Deputy President and Provost Prof Ho Teck Hua, Vice Provost (Student Life) Prof Florence Ling, Dean OSA Assoc Prof Peter Pang, Vice Dean OSA Assoc Prof Vivian Ng and Assistant Dean OSA Dr Chen Zhi Xiong,

We are a group of 489 students from the National University of Singapore (NUS) who are deeply concerned about the University’s approach towards sexual harassment, particularly in reference to the case where a female NUS undergraduate student, Ms Monica Baey, was filmed while showering without her consent. We understand that the offender, who is also an NUS undergraduate, had been caught on CCTV footage. We have also recently learnt from NUS Students’ Union that the NUS Board of Discipline (BOD) had ordered the following for the offender:

i) One semesters’ suspension;

ii) ban from entering into all on-campus housing premises;

iii) mandatory counselling sessions at University Health Centre;

iv) community-based sanctions of 30 hours of supervised community service;

v) mandatory rehabilitation and reconciliation sessions with a social worker;

vi) writing a mandatory letter of apology; and

vii) official letter of reprimand.

While we understand the University’s need to maintain a balanced position on the matter and to keep in line with precedence, we find the punishment meted out in this case problematic because it signals to the NUS community at large that i) our University does not credibly enforce its stance against sexual voyeurism as a serious offence; ii) those who commit such an offence can arguably expect to receive a relatively light sentence; and iii) survivors of sexual violence and harassment will not receive adequate institutional and social support even if they voice their concerns to the relevant authorities. Additionally, the leniency of these punishments may not serve as an adequate deterrent: we note a recent case in 2017 that saw a repeat offender face criminal charges for assault with the intent of outrage of modesty. It is clear that the current disciplinary framework is failing to deter these incidents from recurring within our community. As one of the world’s top universities, we hope that NUS would take a stronger stance against sexual harassment and set a positive example for other universities around the world.

While we are heartened by Dean OSA Assoc Prof Peter Pang’s announcement in his statement released on 20 April 2019 that a committee will be convened to review the current disciplinary and support frameworks, and Prof Pang’s subsequent announcement in an internal circular sent to students on 21 April 2019 that there will be two student representative on this committee, we call on NUS to shed more light on (1) how the student representatives will be selected, (2) what groups of students the committee hopes to target, (3) what the composition of the committee is, (4) what the decision making powers of the committee, if any, are. We urge the University to meaningfully consult students on this important issue and not dictate the terms of such consultation or police student involvement; there is no patience for gestural politics on this urgent issue. We propose that the committee includes representatives from student organizations that have dealt with topics and issues concerning sexual harassment. Such groups include, but are not limited to, the residential teams and other relevant student interest groups in on-campus accommodations such as the Gender Collective, The G Spot, tFreedom, and EnCAPTsulate. We emphasize the need for continuous and meaning engagement with students, and thus call on NUS President Prof Tan Eng Chye to hold a town hall before the end of the semester to listen to and dialogue with our University community about this serious issue and our community’s concerns. The suggestion to hold a town hall has also received widespread support on various social media channels.

Many amongst us have stories, experiences, as well as recommendations that we hope to convey to the University leadership. As a University that “aspires to be a vital community of academics, researchers, staff, students and alumni working together in a spirit of innovation and enterprise for a better world”, we believe that it is important for us to build this culture of collaboration at home, in working together to address this serious issue that threatens the safety and well-being of our students. Below are some of the recommendations that we have consolidated from concerned members of our community since Ms Baey’s story was made public:

1. Immediate Redressal for Ms Baey

First, we suggest that NUS provide stronger immediate redressal for Ms Baey. The statement by A/Prof Pang is commendable for its apologetic tone towards Ms Baey’s plight. However, we call upon NUS to do better by making a stronger statement against sexual harassment on campus. The administration could also provide greater transparency on the investigations conducted for this case and provide the grounds for i) the punitive measures imposed on the offender detailed above and ii) whether these measures are commensurate with penalties imposed for other offences committed in the University.

2. Remedial Measures

Second, NUS should focus more efforts towards restoring and rehabilitating survivors of sexual harassment by:

2.1 Setting up an Office of Sexual Harassment Prevention, Reporting, and Response: A specialised office could be established to educate students about what constitutes sexual harassment and the respective penalties for offences, highlight the modes for recourse for survivors, and effect overall behavioural change in the University through campus-wide awareness campaigns. This Office should also develop and administer a reporting mechanism, online and/or offline, facilitating anonymity, for the NUS community to report cases of sexual harassment. This could include establishing a 24/7 emergency hotline service for survivors, which would particularly be useful for those living on campus. Cases should also be formally recorded and logged, where staff can exercise discretion in escalating severe cases to higher management for disciplinary action. We further call for a mandatory sexual harassment response training to be offered to staff who would work in this office to ensure that they are equipped with the appropriate tools to handle sexual harassment cases.

2.2. Improving rehabilitative support for survivors of sexual harassment: The University should also provide targeted counselling services for survivors of sexual harassment and assault at the University Health Centre (UHC) and/or establish a new, specialised department dedicated to cases of such nature within UHC. Educational resources and collateral detailing what constitutes sexual harassment and avenues for recourse should also be readily available and accessible for the NUS community to seek support and better respond to survivors of sexual harassment.

3. Preventive Measures

Third, NUS should pre-emptively implement measures to target the risk factors of sexual harassment to prevent the occurrence of sexual harassment by:

3.1. Designing and implementing anti-sexual harassment training programmes and/or campaigns in the University, particularly in residences: Since most of these offences seem to have occurred and could continue to occur in University residences, the University should consider implementing a compulsory anti-sexual harassment workshop for all new residents in NUS residences. These workshops should also be offered to freshmen as part of their orientation programme and sporadically throughout the academic year to non-residents from all faculties. These workshops should tackle themes such as consent, bystander intervention, and the social stigma preventing survivors from reporting instances of sexual harassment.

4. Developmental Measures

Fourth, NUS could review and appropriately amend University policy to better address cases of sexual harassment, provide redress for survivors, deter potential aggressors, and change prevailing attitudes tolerating the perpetuation of sexual harassment in NUS by:

4.1. Publicly committing to a zero-tolerance policy against sexual harassment: Commitment towards a zero-tolerance policy against sexual harassment and violence is no longer uncommon in tertiary institutions internationally. The University of Oxford has publicly declared its zero-tolerance approach to sexual harassment and violence. The University of Cambridge, too, has launched its Breaking the Silence campaign since October 2017. Likewise, a collaborative campaign was launched in King’s College London, with its Student’s Union galvanising their student community to come together to make a stand against sexual harassment and misconduct. We urge NUS to follow in the footsteps of these other leading institutions in publicly and explicitly committing to a zero-tolerance campaign against sexual harassment, which includes several of the recommendations in this letter.

4.2. Institutionalising and explicating tiers of penalties accorded to different types of sexual harassment offences in the University Code of Student Conduct: We applaud the recent revision of the Code of Student Conduct, which now explicates what constitutes “sexual misconduct” and “consent”, and includes offences of a voyeuristic nature, such as upskirt photography. We also note that the University has published a guidance note(restricted to circulation within NUS) on student discipline. However, since this note does not explicitly state the penalty guidelines for sexual harassment, we believe that it does not adequately deter repeat sexual harassment offenders. More could be done to clarify and provide rationales for the penalties for these offences to ensure fair and just disciplinary proceedings and judgements for all offenders. If not already established, the University should consider formulating and publicly releasing a framework, specifically delineating the considerations and factors taken into account during sentencing for sexual harassment offences. This framework could include different tiers of punishment which directly correspond to the severity of the offence. Establishing such a framework will potentially be a big step forward in terms of transparency. In turn, such a framework will also reaffirm the University’s commitment to students that perpetrators will be held accountable for their actions and will be dealt with firmly but fairly, in line with a set of formalised and transparent guidelines.

Concluding Remarks

The University has a duty to provide a safe and conducive space for all students, in their holistic development, both academic and otherwise. This, too, reiterates and reaffirms the University’s commitment to considering “students’ perspectives and needs” and exercising “accountability to our stakeholders,” per the values of the NUS Office of Student Affairs.

Beyond the call for immediate redressal for Ms Baey, there is a broader need to address the various systemic issues relating to sexual offences that occur within NUS. Through the detailing of various remedial, preventive and developmental measures above, this statement hopes to provide a good ground for conversation and review to take root and grow. We end by stressing the need for opportunities to dialogue about these issues with other stakeholders through the organisation of a town hall meeting and meaningful student representation in the committee to review the disciplinary procedures.


Signed by 489 NUS students and 194 students from other Unis, Polys and JCs.




Sponsored Content

13 Responses to “Statement of Concern Regarding Sexual Harassment at the National University of Singapore”

  • HarderTruths:

    Why do all the gahmen bodies fear this Nicholas Lim? Cannot be touched?
    Is it just him? If $G man in public shower or toilet did this he would get caned.

    Something real fishy here.

    GD Star Rating
  • LIONS:



    GD Star Rating
  • Bapak:

    In this police state, all the more those in the law faculty (be it undergraduate, graduated, practising law including those in society) are nothing in between down there. Dont have high expectation from this group.



    GD Star Rating
  • rukidding:

    So,?….Universities Professors and Deans are now MORE CONCERN about “face and? also $$$” ?

    “Face” as in Reputation ?…must “white wash” away “ugly” stuff and show only “good”stuff ?

    Simply put it….”wayang”?….or maybe call this incident a “fake News” like the new laws “created” by our Gov ?

    “$$$”…as in salary ?.as in “Income” for university from New Students?

    Die already lah,…..every “BIG shot” here in Sinkapore has be “addicted” and probably “gone crooked” from followng the “Lead by WRONG example”…………….PEE M ?( chow ah gua )

    GD Star Rating
  • 70% voted for this system:

    when you vote in a circus, you get clowns(miws).
    so you young men and ladies ,be careful of who you give your vote to next GE.
    our SG is in the hands of evil clowns.

    GD Star Rating
  • Python 5:

    those having iron ricebowl from NUS won’t dare say or do anything. iron ricebowl. you let this go thru, you’ll have all the kekleng FTs taking videos of girls showering. open season.

    GD Star Rating
  • John Lim:

    Didn’t she make a police report? It’s a criminal offence, isn’t it? Others have been convicted for taking upskirt photo.

    GD Star Rating
  • Where Are You ?:

    Law Faculty Dean. where are you ? Is it none of your business. As Dean. you should be the first to advise the management as this is a legal issue.

    Please say something. You are not there just for show.

    GD Star Rating
  • Regime change is the solution:

    NUS “two strikes and you are out” policy is ludicrous. It should be zero tolerance. The stupid policy is likely because of the large number of foreigners studying at NUS. Expelling them would mean wasting the taxpayers’ money spent on them and the space in the university they took from Singaporeans.

    GD Star Rating
  • patriot of TUMASIK:

    are the STUDENTS of today finally WAKING UP???

    Nobody will STAND up for you if YOU don’t STAND UP for yourself…

    The FEAR Lightning is Dead and CANNOT rise as he claims he will

    Students WRONGED in the Past are waiting to come HOME while growing Old as Activist

    and LASTLY…you have a MIND to be used and “THINK” for yourself and NOT to be “TAUGHT” how to “THINK”

    “THINK” and you are…find TIME to read the “Fajar Generation” and “To Catch a Tartar”…and The Republic of Singapore will RETURN and have HOPE!!!

    GD Star Rating
  • Bapak:

    Now we understand why so many youngsters have to consult IMH. They are so confused taking completely naked pix is a lesser crime than taking upskirt pix.

    John Lim:
    Didn’t she make a police report? It’s a criminal offence, isn’t it? Others have been convicted for taking upskirt photo.

    GD Star Rating
  • Sarla:

    In the end who need to handle the offender?

    GD Star Rating
  • Trail by msm:

    The peeping Tom of NUS has been trailed and convicted on a 12-month probation. The sentence maybe more lenient compared to others with a similar offence and this is exactly the reason for comments on social media including comments made by the education minister.

    This is definitely not trail by media as alluded in the msm. The case is over, done, convicted and signed.

    MSM is thus propagating fake news. Such news should not be allowed to be published in the msm as it is not true.

    These comments, including those from the victims, which I have not read are what you deemed post-conviction discussions. It is exactly with the advent of internet that we see such discussions taking place in the public domain. It is the same in the United States where open post-reportings are still made about the Mueller Report and the hate-Trump media.

    This is healthy discussions and would in no way constitute a trail unless the msm is calling for a re-trail. As a born and bred true blue, I have never heard of a re-trail in this country. To do so, would mean something is amissed in the administration of our laws.

    GD Star Rating

Leave a Reply

 characters available

Member Services
Self-SupportMembers Login
Sponsored Advertisement

Search On TR Emeritus
Sponsored Advertisement

Most Recent Comments
  • ganeshsk: MR/ Tan K L We have to express our opposition by voting the PAP out coming GE.
  • Tee-Tee-A-Ta-Ta: Happy to Migrate: TKL I have done my own research on singaporeans for over 20years. My...
  • Tee-Tee-A-Ta-Ta: TKL aka ‘Ye Fong’ is a joker. Why take him seriously? tan kIn lIan ...
  • Young: People are fighting in coffee shops and mrt trains etc.. At least a good start.
  • patriot of TUMASIK: CI is a possible Mod…or the Mods are aware he CONtributes that is why my post is Moderated...
  • oxygen: @ Believe in 1-party rule LEE-jiapore is an authoritarian regime, not quite the totalitarian rule as you also...
  • Take it from the shrewd: “He who becomes a Prince through the favor of the people should always keep on good...
  • C’est la vie: “Politically aware” in SG !!! Seriously !!! Where are they !!! Stuck under a rock, or busy stuffing...
  • Guide for the Perplexed: “When one’s intention is SINCERE, God will suffice his needs, and protect him, and guide him...
  • ROC: Singaporean majority must learn from Taiwan Chinese. Taiwanese do not believe in one-party rule Taiwan is not...
  • ROC: Taiwan has democracy. Taiwan not ruled by one party or emperor or chairman mao Taiwan does not have GRC Taiwan...
  • opposition dude: It’s practically impossible for the kiasees to vote opposition, their fear just will not allow...
  • Dr. Chan: @Happy to Migrate China was ruled by Dynasties. Under Emperors, Sometimes controlled by Eunuchs, corrupt...
  • SG China track record: 20% humans on this planet , in one country called China have been ruled with an iron fist for...
  • SG china track record: Sign Petition? This never worked in SG. Vote? This never worked in SG. Referendum? This never...
  • Imperial Dog Barking: You stupid or what? Who would want to debunk a madman? Happy to Migrate: You have to...
Visitors Statistic
Latest Statistic