Majulah Singapura; Why change ours – Why was it not good enough?

Our National motto is “Majulah Singapura ” which is the title of our National Anthem. Our National Anthem has been described as “a musical expression of Singapore’s identity as a nation”. It is a rousing and uplifting piece of sacred vocal music that has very special importance to us Singaporeans.

On 3 Dec 2019, two renditions of the National Anthem were released on social media by the Government as part of the celebrations of the 60th anniversary of our state symbols.

The first was described as an official fresh re-recording of the National Anthem, performed by the Singapore Symphony Orchestra (SSO) which was played in public on the steps of the National Gallery Singapore and over the radio. The new recording marks the second update to the National Anthem since the original National Anthem was recorded. The official re-recording was based on the rearrangement by composer Phoon Yew Tien in 2001 and not Zubair Said’s original arrangement.

The other music video was released on social media the same day featured veteran singer Ramli Sarip’s performance at the National Day Parade (NDP) this year.

These new renditions of our National Anthem have attracted some controversy and criticism.

On the other hand, others have praised these renditions. Progress Singapore Party (PSP) Secretary-General Dr. Tan Cheng Bock for example welcomed the new rendition as a praiseworthy achievement. It is certainly at one level a matter of taste and appreciation of effort.

I am therefore now writing with a view to present the issues that have arisen by the Government’s decision to re-record or otherwise allow changes to our National Anthem to put the matter into some perspective.

What changed?

Was the National Anthem changed by either of these renditions? What was the nature and extent to which the National Anthem was changed are important matters to discuss.

The official re-recorded version of Majulah Singapura retained Encik Zubir Said’s original lyrics and has been alleged to be only a “better sound quality to reflect the improvements in audio technology”.

However anyone listening to it would discern a significant quickening of the tempo in the music making it a rather different song from our National Anthem. Dr. Tan Cheng Bock noted that: “This 2019 recording, has the same key and arrangement as the 2001 recording, with a slightly faster timing.”

As to the Sarip ethnic instrumentation rendition music video, the music was re-arranged by Dr Sydney Tan, who was also the music director for this year’s NDP.

According to main stream media, apart from Mr Ramli’s soulful and stirring voice, the Sarip ethnic instrumentation rendition stands “in stark contrast from the original” and is therefore different from the National Anthem in at least the following material respects:

* The music arrangement “strips (the anthem) down to its essence”
* “There is less instrumentation in this version compared to SSO’s version.”
* The music arrangement featured traditional ethnic music instruments such as the erhu and tabla allegedly to make the anthem “more Singaporean”

To me it was plain that the erhu a Chinese classical musical instrument featured prominently in what seemed to be a completely different song from our National Anthem that incorporated a composition and medley for these featured instruments that did not make the anthem “more Singaporean” but marked its sinicisation as it was “more Chinese” than anything else.

There is nothing particularly uplifting or triumphant about the musical arrangement of the Sarip ethnic instrumentation rendition though Sarip’s soulful singing of the lyrics delivered some salvation of an otherwise totally different song from our National Anthem.

A brief history of our national anthem

“Majulah Singapura” our National Anthem was composed in 1958 by the late Encik Zubir Said for the City Council to commemorate the newly renovated Victoria Theatre.

When Singapore attained self-government in 1959, the Government felt that a national anthem was needed to unite the different races in Singapore.

It was decided that the City Council’s song, which was already popular, would serve this purpose with minor adjustments. After some revisions were made to the song by Encik Zubir Said at Dr Toh Chin Chye’s request, it was adopted by the Legislative Assembly on 11 November 1959 to create the National Anthem that we sing today.

On 30 November 1959, the Singapore State Arms and Flag and National Anthem Ordinance 1959 was passed to regulate the use and display of the State Arms and State Flag and the performance of the National Anthem.

”Majulah Singapura” was performed on 3 December 1959 as Singapore’s National Anthem replacing the colonial anthem “God Save the Queen” at City Hall on the same day that Mr Yusof Ishak was sworn in as Singapore’s head of state.

The National Anthem has been re-arranged and re-recorded three times. First in 1989 (in the key of G), then on 19 January 2001 (in the lower key of F) and now again in December 2019.

These facts are essentially from the National Heritage Board’s website. See : National Anthem

The legal framework

Whether or not we like the new renditions of the National Anthem, it is important to consider whether these new renditions violate our laws.

I for one find Sarip’s articulation of the lyrics highly moving especially within the version he recorded for National Day 2019 even if I do not like the musical arrangement of the Sarip ethnic instrumentation rendition now in question at all.

It is after all not just a matter of taste but first and foremost a matter of law.

The Singapore Arms and Flag and National Anthem Act and Rules enacted thereunder regulates the use, display and performance of the Singapore Coat of Arms, Flag and National Anthem.

Rule 2 of the Singapore Arms and Flag and National Anthem Rules defines the “National Anthem’’ as meaning “the national anthem of Singapore, the music score for the official arrangement and the official lyrics of which are set out in the Third Schedule”.

Rule 13(1) provides that: “Any person performing or singing the National Anthem shall perform or sing the National Anthem according to the official arrangement in the Third Schedule or any other arrangement permitted under paragraph (2).”

While Rule 13 (2) expressly provides that “(t)he National Anthem may be rearranged in any manner” this authority to rearrange it is clearly equally restricted by certain conditions including for such rearrangement to be “in keeping with the dignity due to the National Anthem” and for it to “accurately reflect the complete tune” and otherwise inter-alia subject to its prohibition from being “incorporated into any other composition or medley”.

For a Government that is usually entirely trigger happy to apply the letter of the law and otherwise regularly throws the rule book at all and sundry, they seem to be rather recalcitrant in applying the rules to themselves. They seem to me to be rather cavalier about the application of the laws to uphold the sanctity of the National Anthem.

The question is why? What is the agenda behind this new found flexibility? There is simply nothing that they do that is without careful long term planning and good reason.

The issues

The questions that arise from the release of these two “modern” renditions of the National include the following:-

- What is the true nature and scope of the changes made by these recordings?

- Do any of these recordings amount to a rearrangement of the “official arrangement” of the National Anthem?

- Were they “in keeping with the dignity due to the National Anthem” which include by definition “the music score for the official arrangement”?

- Are these recordings of the National Anthem in accordance with the “the music score for the official arrangement” as they are by law supposed to be?

- Do they accurately reflect the “complete tune” of the National Anthem?

- Were they wrongfully “incorporated into any other composition or medley”?

- Were the changes necessary?

Zubir Said’s daughter’s concerns

Dr Rohana Zubir the daughter of the composer of our National Anthem criticised the Sarip ethnic instrumentation rendition.

She shared her thoughts in an open letter that has been made public which included the following: “Every anthem deserves to be sacred. It should not to be meddled with or experimented with to suit the whims of someone else’s musical inclinations. Sadly, the revised rendition of “Majulah Singapura” lacks the quality, the oomph, of a national anthem. It is rather tortuous to listen to.

Anthems of the world, such as “God Save the King/Queen”, have been around for centuries unchanged. They are considered sacred. Even Malaysia’s “Negara Ku” is untainted by change. The people of Singapore are wonderfully creative but this creativity should not extend to meddling with the musical score of the country’s national anthem. This is one area where there should not be change. It is also important for Singaporeans to be proud of their history and to respect individuals, such as my father, for their contribution to nation-building.”

It is my understanding that Dr Rohana Zubir was concerned about the changes made in both new renditions. She was clear on the crucial aspect as to the need for any change to the National Anthem. What she said bears repetition: “Every anthem deserves to be sacred. It should not to be meddled with or experimented with to suit the whims of someone else’s musical inclinations.”

It is therefore not just a matter of taste but rather clearly as explained a matter of sacred duty and respect according to Dr Rohana Zubir.

Conclusion

Nations rarely change their National Anthem. Why change ours? Why was it not good enough?

It is my view that it would be good to get a full official explanation as to the changes made and have the Government address the issues raised here.

 

Khush Chopra

 

 

yyy
SPONSORED ADVERTISEMENT
Loading...

15 Responses to “Majulah Singapura; Why change ours – Why was it not good enough?”

  • becuz they say so:

    they’ll rewrite the constitution to make it lawful.
    if they can turn an indian into a malay, what else they wont do.
    this new version definitely had to be screened and ok’d by the miws before it was aired by us.
    so wait for their wayang explanations…or miws oredy explained??? i dunno..

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • becuz they say so:

    becuz they say so:
    they’ll rewrite the constitution to make it lawful.
    if they can turn an indian into a malay, what else they wont do.
    this new version definitely had to be screened and ok’d by the miws before it was aired by us.
    so wait for their wayang explanations…or miws oredy explained??? i dunno..

    error ,shd read. “…before it was aired for us …”

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • The Sacred Five:

    Five things that should be respected and protected by Singaporeans from arbitrary changes and corruptions: the Flag, the Constitution, the Pledge, the National Anthem, and the Elections.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Dr. Chan:

    The most important thing that needs to be change now is the Jiak Liao Bee PAP Government run by white horse, fake scholar, paper generals, no real world experience ministers who think they know it all but in reality they know shit.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Asd:

    I think I heard its changed to malula

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Serve, not be served0:

    becuz they say so:
    they’ll rewrite the constitution to make it lawful.
    if they can turn an indian into a malay, what else they wont do.
    this new version definitely had to be screened and ok’d by the miws before it was aired by us.
    so wait for their wayang explanations…or miws oredy explained??? i dunno..

    Nowadays, these miws are getting more arrogant and aloof. They don’t care to explain or pretend everything is ok and ignore feedbacks.

    Just like edu ministar ong yee goon who is neither seen nor heard when a school child got shamed and humiliated by his subordinates through no default of the poor child.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Nothing Better To Do:

    I think Grace Fu has nothing better to do although so many problems have not been solved. In this case, we should reduce her salary by 70 per cent for having nothing much to do. Good Idea ?

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Harder Truths:

    The National Anthem is now “Matilah $ingapura” and sounds like a funeral dirge.

    A fitting epitaph on the goovernment-erected tombstone of a dying population.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • No eyes see:

    Nothing Better To Do:
    I think Grace Fu has nothing better to do although so many problems have not been solved. In this case, we should reduce her salary by 70 per cent for having nothing much to do. Good Idea ?

    Cannot lah!

    Woman with big nose needs lots of money to maintain her lifestyle loh.

    To collect $m, she can say she has contributed brilliant idea what.

    Sinkies, how? You all not happy meh…

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • patriot of TUMASIK:

    “Change is the ESSENCE of Life when you stop to change you begun to DIE!!!” Guess whose QUOTE???

    Pak Ramli, better known as Pak Rock’s version is from the heart and reach out to the Souls of the Nation…especially the 1,000,000 plus unborn Slaughtered in the name of Evil for want of an Elite Society…

    Due respects to Pak Zubir, his lyrics remain but the music was written to sound like a marching tune of the Nazi Storm Troopers… Gleefully accepted to create a Master Race by none other than the man who Con You!!!

    in Pak Ramli’s version, the music Reach the Heart and Soul of the Decent & Hard Working who loves and care for their Nation & People…Not-Self, FamiLee & Cronies

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • zhengxin guan:

    the new music arrangement is extremely vexing. the anthem’s purity and continuity is BUTCHERED into eight parts …no thanks to the loud cymbal clashing E I G H T times!!! …eight times? seriously?

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Be worthy:

    Nothing Better To Do:
    I think Grace Fu has nothing better to do although so many problems have not been solved. In this case, we should reduce her salary by 70 per cent for having nothing much to do. Good Idea ?

    Really wonder what she does collecting fat pay, nothing at all concrete or significant to improve our life.

    One thing though. SHE can be really b*tchy with her face like trying to fix wp.

    Can some one enlighten us?

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Pioneer:

    The bunch of million$$$ megaster$, esp the disgraceful woman, just one to show off or boast that she is worthed more than million$$$ or more in salary. So, they made changes to our country’s anthem unilaterally (w/o debating it in ParLeemen or consultation with the citizens). Mind u, the national anthem does NOT belong to the pay and pay, but all Singaporeans, incl. our opposition parties. Suka suka change this and that when they felt threatened, e.g. the minority PAPresident .

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Forefathers par excellence!:

    To the memory of En. Zubir Said & our Founding Fathers:

    Mari kita Rakyat Singapura
    Majulah Singapura!

    https://youtu.be/MAOb-kY6b2k

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • AristoCATs nailed it !:

    Harder Truths:
    The National Anthem is now “Matilah $ingapura” and sounds like a funeral dirge.

    . . .

    -
    Insightful !
    -
    the AristoCATs nailed it – { coffin } :(

    GD Star Rating
    loading...

Leave a Reply

 characters available


Scroll Down For More Interesting Stuff


Member Services
Self-SupportMembers Login
Sponsored Advertisement
Search On TR Emeritus
Sponsored Advertisement
Most Recent Comments
  • Mercy: Be merciful to those in need or in hardship. No need to add to their trouble. Crazy to send and add legal...
  • NotMyProblem: I still remember the Hep-C cover-up before the last GE. Only after somebody died, it was disclosed only...
  • VTO: Well, this govt’s open leg policy welcome influx of mediocre foreign workers, they all came –...
  • Harder Truths: hahahahaha – the 70% shitting in their pants everytime someone sneezes. Who said karma was not...
  • DavidNeo&IreneVanessa:Bastards: Rich people are welcomed everywhere.
  • Harder Truths: it is expected that the fast-tracked FT then start bringing in their familes, relations and villages...
  • DavidNeo&IreneVanessa:Bastards: ask 70%
  • DavidNeo&IreneVanessa:Bastards: Communists got no elites?
  • NotMyProblem: If there is any need to compensate, the compensation should be to the person who was quarantined and...
  • Truth Seeker: TRE Techie: Frankly, I have no objection to the govt’s giving out of $100 to those quarantined...
  • nizhemoshou: should count also the reported 10k or so Wuhan residents who took flight to SG to escape the lockdown of...
  • Say swee swee: Oh no I will give the job to LIM SWEE SWEE .. and his protégées Mdm Joseph Teo .. both sama Sama...
  • TRE Techie: Simon has always struck me as an extreme writer. Most of his articles I have read are all very slanted,...
  • nizhemoshou: why? bcos clown leegime knows majority to be quarantined are the thousands of prcs who have come back or...
  • Good for nothing 4Gs: Flabbergasted: elections coming, must give chicken wings. if not, you die your business,...
  • N.Jungne: Alarmak be carefull, they Pofma you
Announcement
Advertisements
Advertisements
Visitors Statistic
Latest Statistic