What the ‘review’ would be

I can tell you what the “review” will conclude, and it is the same for any govt failing:

“The system worked fine as shown by Parti Liyani being acquitted by the courts. What went wrong was not a systemic problem, but due to human factors.”

Then, steps will be taken to prevent this, scapegoats found, and then, case closed.

Yes, I am cynical about the “review”. What should be done is for an independent body to conduct the review, not a former PAP MP who is now the dep AG.

Ok, I’m taking bets now, for those who disagree with my prediction.

 

Andrew Loh

 

 

yyy
SPONSORED ADVERTISEMENT
Loading...

17 Responses to “What the ‘review’ would be”

  • Harder Truths:

    I agree.
    Ownself protect ownself.
    Ownself protect LML because he is ‘team player’.
    Ownself fix up referee because he goes against ‘team’ & ‘team player’.
    Ownself shift goalpost location so this kind of own goal will not happen again.
    Ownself continue to play pasang kaki as usual.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Yes, Ownself check ownself.
    Answer is nothing wrong, on the poor defendless person have the bear with the bullying.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • oxygen:

    I THINK A TIDAL WAVE OF JUSTICE-FUELED ANGER is waiting to see if the stupid puppy (read discrepit system) will engage in coprophagia (eating its own excrement) or not.

    It is a matter of public interest preservation or the protection of vested excluded interests.

    Without explicit transparency, blunt accountability and justice restored (including fair financial compensation to Parti Liyani for the traumatic ordeal she was forced to endure for 4 years) in the forward review, eroded public trusts in national institutions cannot be restored.

    Remember what is in our national pledge?

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • NotMyProblem:

    I reckon they will waste alot of trees in the useless report after the reviews. They will copy and paste your paragraph at the end and use a scapegoat name. The scapegoat will likely be a junior officer of the police and case closed.

    The whole saga will repeat over again in future.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • fair is fair - 2 yrs + 2 mths:

    unless pap liew mun leong serves 2 years and 2 months in pap jail for lying to pap judge lying to pap agc lying to pap police, then, clear as day there is corruption in the pap process.

    fair is fair.

    2 years and 2 months. more would not serve the fair turn. less would not serve the fair purpose. so, 2 years and 2 months jail for pap liew mn leong and case can close.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Only the truth pls:

    Agree with you 100%. They would not dare getting independent reviewers for fear more skeletons may be exposed. Independent reviewers is a must, and they should also get hold of correspondences (WhatsApp, SMS messages, e-mails, voice recording of any phone calls etc) between the Liew family on the fateful day the Maid was dismissed and sent back. With these in hand, the intent behind the dismissal will become crystal clear. The Indonesian Govt I believe would also want to know the Truth, not some fabrication !!

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • ..and justice for all:

    we’ve seen it happen before.
    so you are correct. agree.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Halimah Totally USELESS:

    Your deduction is as good as mine, the review will be another one of the PAPIGS greatest show on earth, another block blaster where all the players and actors are one and the same.

    We have seen plenty of reruns of these wayang shows done by the PAPIGS, this will be no different.

    Can another expect anything different when the cast for the roadshow are from the same famiLEE.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • xoxo:

    As the dirty * du$t* settles down, its again time to PUSH BLAME/S by MANUFACTURING ALL SORTS OF ESCUSES???

    THE SHOW MUST GO ON…

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Quran ch. 9: REPENTANCE:

    67. The hypocritical men and women are alike; they enjoin evil and forbid what is good, keeping their fists closed. They have forsaken God, and the Lord forsakes them likewise. These hypocrites are indeed sinful transgressors.

    68. God has promised that hypocritical women and men together with narcissistic ingrates, will abide in the blazing fires of Hell. That befits them, for God has cursed them with a lasting chastisement.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Sebeiho:

    Who will be in trouble after the review;
    1.the trail judge?
    2. the police?
    3. the DPP?
    4. LML?
    5. Ng Lai Peng
    6. Karl?
    7. Liew Cheng May?
    8. Heather Lim?
    9. Parti Liyani?
    10. Anil Balachandini?
    11. Justice Chan Seng Onn?
    Who will cause the least damage to the establishment?
    Let’s enjoy the wayang!!!!

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • What a pity:

    Andrew, you can bet TRE’s 1 year free upkeep just gone down the drain. Really meant it.

    Tech: Huh???

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Boh Kia See:

    In my view, it is possible that the Appeal Judge’s position(Justice Chan) will be in danger.

    The last time this occurred was at the Magistrate Court level involving one Micheal Khoo who was the magistrate then.

    I understand one political science lecturer called Walshe is now in self exile. When she was spouting forth with her opinions on the political scene, I did think she may not last long in her job. So it was not a surprise to hear that she is not in Singapore anymore.

    Eliminating opposition voices and increasing interlocking relationships among the elites are practices of a dictatorial system. The WP is seen as a well trained puppy that will not endanger the PAP but also provide them with a facade of “democracy” that does not exist.

    I think it should be the aim of any opposition party is to achieve the aim of forming a Government–not provide a side show.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • here is Our verdict:

    Sebeiho:
    Who will be in trouble after the review;
    1.the trail judge? — jailed 2years 2months, incompetent
    2. the police? — IO in charge of case jailed 3years 3months, corrupt
    3. the DPP? — jailed 4 years 4 months, most corrupt
    4. LML? — jailed 6years 6months, being 2years 2months for fixing offence and additional 1year 1month as warning to other pap members
    5. Ng Lai Peng — 6years 6months
    6. Karl? — 6years 6months
    7. Liew Cheng May? — 6years 6months
    8. Heather Lim? — 6years 6months
    9. Parti Liyani? — compensated with S$4m, being S$1m per year of agony
    10. Anil Balachandini? — compensated with S$4m
    11. Justice Chan Seng Onn? — to be selected as President of Singapore
    Who will cause the least damage to the establishment? — no such thing since pap is gone case in 4 years’ time after GE2024.
    Let’s enjoy the wayang!!!!

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • NotMyProblem:

    Sebeiho:
    Who will be in trouble after the review;
    1.the trail judge?
    2. the police?
    3. the DPP?
    4. LML?
    5. Ng Lai Peng
    6. Karl?
    7. Liew Cheng May?
    8. Heather Lim?
    9. Parti Liyani?
    10. Anil Balachandini?
    11. Justice Chan Seng Onn?
    Who will cause the least damage to the establishment?
    Let’s enjoy the wayang!!!!

    One junior officer from the police! Maybe NSman!

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • C.O.I cannot be avoided:

    OWN SELF CHECK OWN SELF……WILL NOT GO FAR…AS IN THE PAST HAD SHOWN.

    A C.O.I LED BY A HIGH COURT WILL SOLVE THESE BASIC MAJOR FLAWS THAT CANNOT
    BE SHOCKINGLY OVERLOOKED BY AUTHORITIES DURING THE INVESTIGATIONS AND TRIALS.
    ASEAN COUNTRIES WILL LAUGH AT THESE THESE MAJOR FLAWS OF OUR INSTITUTIONS.
    OUR SO CALLED FIRST WORLD INSTITUTIONS HAVE DETERIORATE TO THE LOWEST IN THEIR EYES, NO DIFFERENT FROM THEIRS OR EVEN WORSE.
    EITHER WHICH THE PRESIDENT HOLDING THE SECOND KEY TO ENSURE THE INTEGRITY OF THESE INSTITUTIONS, CAN INITIATE A C.O.I ,CARRYING OUT THE OFFICE OF PRESIDENCY FOR WHICH THE LAWS HAVE ENACTED .
    WHAT MADE THE NEED VERY URGENT FOR A C.O.I (COMMITTEE OF INQUIRY), IS THAT THERE WERE 3 AND NOT 1 INSTITUTION WERE INVOLVED IN THIS COURT CASE, AND THE NEWS MAY SPREAD TO MANY COUNTRIES CAG HAS BUSINESSES AS ITS FORMER CAG CHAIRMAN MADE HEADLINES IN REGIONAL NEWS.
    A C.O.I WILL GREATLY ALLAY THE CONCERNS OF THE COMMON PEOPLE,AND DISPEL THE PERCEPTIONS THAT THEY FOR YRS THE COMMON AND POOR ARE HEAVILY PENALISED FOR MINOR OFFENCES AND THE RICH AND WELL CONNECTED ARE LIGHTLY PUNISHED.
    PSE CONDUCTED A C.O.I, IN THE INTERESTS OF THE NATION.
    INTEGRITY OF OUR INSTITUTIONS IS SACROSANT, A C.O.I CANNOT BE AVOIDED.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • PAP guaranteed to lose:

    As I said PAP guaranteed to lose and so with this case it has lost many potential PAP votes.

    PM and his Ministers took the Pledge to build a democratic society based on justice and equality? Haha. Hypocrites.

    PAP guaranteed lose.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...

Leave a Reply

 characters available


Scroll Down For More Interesting Stuff


Member Services
Self-SupportMembers LoginSelf-Support
Sponsored Advertisement
Search On TR Emeritus
Sponsored Advertisement
Announcement
Advertisements
Visitors Statistic
Latest Statistic
Advertisement
Recent Comments

UA-67043412-1