include("cmp.php");

Statement by Parti Liyani on Conduct of Police Officers

On 3 July 2020, I submitted a complaint against several officers of Tanglin Police Division. I requested the Singapore Police Force Internal Affairs Office to conduct an inquiry into their conduct of the investigations and trial against me.  My complaint addressed the following areas:

1. In Court, there was possible tampering with evidence in an attempt to cast me as being untruthful to the Court.  During my cross-examination, when the Deputy Public Prosecutor (DPP) asked the police officer to hand me the Gerald Genta watch, my lawyer observed that the police officer started shaking the watch while it was in his hand.  I was then asked if the watch was working.  At that point, and as the watch was passed around the Courtroom, its hands were moving. But during re-examination when my lawyer specifically asked the police officer not to shake the watch, the watch hands did not move at all.

2. Four statements were recorded from me without a Bahasa Indonesia-speaking interpreter. During these same interviews, I was not allowed to physically view the allegedly stolen items.

3. There were delays in the securing of evidence that raised significant concerns over the integrity of the evidence that was used to charge me.

4. There were wrong instructions given to the police crime scene specialist by the investigating officer, leading to a misleading sketch that inaccurately depicted three boxes of allegedly stolen items at that material time.

I am waiting for a substantive update on my request for these aspects of the police officers’ conduct to be reviewed.

I am glad to know that the various agencies involved in my case have stated their intention to rectify the issues illustrated by my case, and to make improvements across the criminal justice system. That was my intent in filing the complaint against the  police officers, and also when I made the application for an inquiry into the conduct of the DPPs in my case. What happened to me may also happen to many other disadvantaged people. I hope that the review based on my complaint may contribute to fully and transparently addressing the broader issues, and improving the fairness of the criminal justice system for all.

 

PARTI LIYANI

 

* Source: HOME Website.

 

 

 

 

yyy
SPONSORED ADVERTISEMENT
Loading...

13 Responses to “Statement by Parti Liyani on Conduct of Police Officers”

  • Harder Truths:

    According to the god of law there was no wrongdoing. Nothing will be done Parti – you are wasting your time. This is $G, not a democratic country like where you come from.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Lye Khuen Way:

    Indeed, “Harder Truth” you are honest and fairly accurate.

    We should be ashamed of our Parliament could be turned into a Court with no witnesses and accused present!

    Uniquely $inkapoor.

    Harder Truths:
    According to the god of law there was no wrongdoing. Nothing will be done Parti – you are wasting your time. This is $G, not a democratic country like where you come from.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • xoxo:

    Now,THIS IS A REAL FOREIGN TALENT!!!
    Many sgs cannot even do what she is trying to do for SOCIAL JUSTICE for the lesser among us?

    Sgs shud salute her for daring to stick her neck out for TRUTH.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • oxygen:

    THIS CASE SHOULD NOT HAVE GONE INTO TRIAL, there was no case to pursue given the contaminated evidences.

    When the broken Gerald Genta watch was discredited of flawed evidence, the prosecution had the urgent immediate responsible opportunity to withdraw the case. Alternatively, the sitting judge could have dismissed the case as without merit.

    In the subordinate court hearing, did the lawyer for Parti Liyani has any avenue to cross-examine the police officer in question on why he shook the watch?

    If the defence lawyer cannot cross-examine the police officer tendering the evidence of a broken Gerald Genta watch, was there any PROCEDURAL UNFAIRNESS introduced into the trial proceedings which prejudiced Parti Liyani’s defence and outcome in her wrongful initial conviction?

    THIS IS AN IMPORTANT QUESTION of JUDICIAL PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS issue which the prosecution, having seen the watch shaken only to be discredited in the courtroom, is aware or must he taken to be aware of procedural bias THUS EXPOSED which must ultimately render the continued prosecution of Parti Liyani an ‘UNSAFE” PROSECUTION which could or may likely fail on any subsequent appeal (WHICH IT DID IN THE HIGH COURT APPEAL in this instance).

    I would have thought that the evidence should be correctly tendered and presented by the DPP personally in cross-examination of the accused, no less because the DPP could be asked ON THE SPOT to explain why he/she is shaking a broken watch to wake up to its full functionality and assessment of actual loss (if stolen or alleged to be stolen).

    Was this case an unjustified prosecution which also failed on flawed evidence and corroded by procedural unfairness which led to an “UNSAFE” OUTCOME??

    That is everything that could have gone wrong, did went badly wrong right from the beginning before the appeal went to the High Court??

    I have compelling apprehension that a lot of public mind will think it is so.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Flickshit:

    No matter how the govt want to press down this brave lady. And if half of the Indonesian citizens take up to support her and march down to Istana to protest, then I think will be good enough to make PAP balls shrink.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Halimah Totally USELESS:

    How is it that the Sr Kiew and the wifey got away scot free when they were found to be asking the maid to go clean their son’s abode ??
    How is it that MOM declared that no offence was committed ???
    Ownself protect ownself ???

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Police CLOSE DOWN:

    Did you read of the masters student who sued NUS? She did post on TRE before.

    xoxo:
    Now,THIS IS A REAL FOREIGN TALENT!!!
    Many sgs cannot even do what she is trying to do for SOCIAL JUSTICE for the lesser among us?

    Sgs shud salute her for daring to stick her neck out for TRUTH.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • shining beacon:

    Parti liyani , a domestics worker from an impoverished country has set an example to singaporeans on human rights and addressing injustice. Shame on those singaporean who cant even stand up for themselves.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • PAP gaming us:

    But the nation had ” CHOOSEN” SCHOLARS of the BEST kind to represent us.

    How is it these so called scholars are screwing us ?

    So gov , plus scholars are ” GAMING” us , all this while..

    So, your father, mother, grandchokongs ,HAD been ” GAMED”

    ALL THESE 20+ YEARS !!!!

    STUPID PPL YOUR FATHERS, MOTHERS, GRANDCHOKONGS….

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Thinkforothers:

    Remember those days Singaporeans who do not know the word “PHYCOLOGIES” in which LKY uses it to Singaporeans, because most people from China and other countries in which they are not highly educated. The reason why Singapore is in the present situation.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • shining beacon::

    Thinkforothers: shining beacon:

    that is because the papy doesn’t want u to learn an education system with psychology and finance or sociology ,

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Singaporeahseng:

    The evidences against the prosecutors are very clear. Shamugan should punish them for putting the police into a bad light.

    So are all the other prosecutors, who looks every inexperienced and uneducated. Looks like all they want is a prosecution for the Judge to accept without question?

    Shamugan shd prosecute these bad eggs prosecutors who gave us a bad name. Even conflict of documents they dont review is already bad faith.

    Can Shamugan look at other prosecutors against cases to see if there are injustices? This is the least you can do for earning millions of dollars from tax payers.

    We pay and you do the work. Not we pay, and yet, we have to do the investigation?

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • liew mun leong must be jailed:

    the INDIAN president masquerading as malay with bedsheet on head is no sound no fury.

    quiet because own hands are dirty from pretending to be someone when not and denying to be someone when is.

    after all, is pap clown malay? No. why no? because his papa lee kuan yew is Chinese.

    but pap president papa is indian. how come she is malay president? aha. that is the INSIDE 200m is not within 200m logic. in pap lingua, it is this, for the purposes of denying Dr Tan CB of the presidency, we shall declare an INDIAN as malay president.

    that is why no sound no fury from INDIAN president in malay istana on the low mun leong maid case.

    tragic really that such can take place in a once great island nation.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...

Leave a Reply

 characters available


Scroll Down For More Interesting Stuff


Member Services
Self-SupportMembers LoginSelf-Support
Sponsored Advertisement
Search On TR Emeritus
Sponsored Advertisement
Announcement
Advertisement
Visitors Statistic
Latest Statistic

UA-67043412-1