include("cmp.php");

Judicial Review challenge to discriminatory policies against the un-vaccinated

We would like to apologise for the delay in the release of this article as we have had to collect, collaborate and corroborate the information we received to ensure that any information we present on TR Emeritus (TRE) is current and as accurate as possible.

We are now able to confirm that there are at least 10 (TEN)* potential litigants who are seriously intending to mount a Judicial Review challenge to the supposedly extremely discriminatory policies slapped on the un-vaccinated. The litigants are all un-vaccinated and strongly feel that they have been gravely discriminated against and inconvenienced, even to the extent of possibly losing their livelihood – a blatant violation of their legal rights guaranteed under the Constitution of the Republic of Singapore.

To avoid a complete waste of time and resources, we have taken advice from practicing lawyers and they have opined that these litigants have the “locus standi” to commence such a “bona fide” action. TRE has also taken advice from medical professor and financial consultant for other matters related to such an action.

According to the latest stats available, there are at least 800,000 un-vaccinated residents in Singapore who are affected, so these potential litigants have suggested that TRE could assist in publishing their intended action so that others who share their plight may join them, thus helping to split the legal fees, currently roughly estimated to be about S$50,000 – S$80,000. Depending on the number of potential litigants, the legal fees may or may not be crowd funded – it will be decided at a later date.

In the meantime, to protect the privacy of these litigants, TRE will not be releasing their particulars until the action has been confirmed to be proceeding, while we offer our platform for those who have been affected and wishes to join in the action to contact us with their basic information, so that we may pass it on to the originator potential litigants to work out the finer details on how to proceed.

For those interested, only your name, a contactable mobile number and a simple and short description of how you are affected will do, for example: “cannot go to work”. Please note that you do not need to be un-vaccinated to be a litigant in this action, if any of your family members is un-vaccinated and affected, that should suffice.

To facilitate the planned action, TRE has setup a special email address ([email protected]) only for those intending to join the action or have further questions. It will be functional only for 7 days, up till 7th November 2021 @ 2359 hrs. All information received will be kept fully private and confidential and only released to the originator litigants and lawyers concerned. Should the action not proceed, we will shred all the information received on this email address.

To cut to the chase, we leave our readers with the following comment from one of our readers who has expressed strong support for the planned Judicial Review.

It is important to make a point that as a Nation, there are people who disagree with such persecution of the minority group of our fellow citizens and let it be recorded in history that no matter how small our numbers are, we uphold the principles of Basic Human Rights to human life.

To corner and push a group of people who refused to take the vaccine which technically could not pass the stringent criteria of approval for mass inoculation, to the extent of persecution and losing their jobs, is immoral, unethical and totally unacceptable for any decent human beings with dignity.

Please help to share this post on your social media pages and channels.

Thank you for your continued support and do stay safe.
.

 

* The number of potential litigants will be updated on a as and when basis, when TRE has received confirmation of an intention to join the action.

** TRE is also on FaceBook at  and Twitter.

TRE’s servers do not run on free air and there are charges incurred in the thousands of dollars per year. If you believe in what we do, please consider signing up for our membership or making a small donation here.

.

yyy
READER COMMENTS BELOW

53 Responses to “Judicial Review challenge to discriminatory policies against the un-vaccinated”

  • I think if these people engage Davinder to represent them, then very high chance of success lor, since he is a sibeio tokong lawyer.

    But I think Davinder will reject, citing “conflict of interest”, since Davinder’s firm has been known to only handle sure-win pro-LEEders’ cases.

    What do you think?

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Harder Truths:

    It is sorely needed but we have a ballsless law society that is part of the Regime, plus we have castrated medical practitioners who will never give evidence to support the unvaccinated’s cause.

    Any legal challenge in $G against the Regime will fail. That is evident fro mthe time the Dead Despot changed the local marsupial laws to bar any appeal to the Privy Council in the UK.

    The most likely outcome that can happen is the Marsupial Court finds the measures that unvaccinated are disadvantaged by are to ‘protect’ them from themselves. just like putting an inmate into the IMH for their own protection.

    In gambling you can never win against the House. Same thing here.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • @Harder Truths

    I would agree with you 101%.

    However, sometimes a point has to be made and a stand clear as crystal. Just because there are policies that cannot be challenged, does not mean that everyone is all for it.

    That having said, I would really love to see Davinder argue the case for this group of people, but I also know that is impossible, heard he is very expensive, so much so that only the LEEders can afford him.

    One simple walk-in-the-park case which even a paralegal can win already easily $100,000 liao, if this group of people wants to crowdfund to engage him, they would need $1,000,000???

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • MarBowling:

    TRE Techie:
    October 29, 2021 at 6:03 am (Quote)
    @Harder Truths

    I would agree with you 101%.

    However, sometimes a point has to be made and a stand clear as crystal. Just because there are policies that cannot be challenged, does not mean that everyone is all for it.

    That having said, I would really love to see Davinder argue the case for this group of people, but I also know that is impossible, heard he is very expensive, so much so that only the LEEders can afford him.

    One simple walk-in-the-park case which even a paralegal can win already easily $100,000 liao, if this group of people wants to crowdfund to engage him, they would need $1,000,000???

    Response: D Singh is a $mart Cookie. In fact he is smarter and better person to be appointed as the Home and Law Minister than the current ShameMuGam. However, as a TOP DOG Lawyer, he will and can earn MORE by just acting for Mai Hum and his FamiLEE. ShameMuGam only earns a couple of $millions. D Singh would earn many times MORE! He is like his mentor Lee Kayu who had the ability to ARGUE and WIN the case even when the defendant is about to face the gallow!

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Realistically:

    As I hv indicated b4, I am prepared to be the applicant for a judicial review of this epic mismanagement of the COVID-19 pandemic based on the FACTS and the Supreme Law of SINKaPOOR, which is the Constitution.

    However, any legal issues b4 the court has to comply with the requirements stated in the Rules of Court…………..and the preparation for the case requires a lot of time and nitty gritty paper work like printing and binding SEVEN COPIES of the written submissions, not to forget that the collation of the facts/figures/charts and putting all this together with the legal arguments which have to be based on better understanding of the Constitution and case laws on the various aspects takes a lot of time……………which I cannot spare.

    Oh, just the cost for:

    printing/binding, filing fees, court fees and deposit would probably be in the region of $30k………….not including any other costs if the AG which is the Government’s legal counsel would apply to strike out the application, and the associate legal costs which must be added to the said $30k.

    The issue of locus standi of the applicant is also a material consideration……….hos the irrational policies/restrictions of the MMTF affect or breach the rights of the applicant with underlying medical condition; those who would be affected by the coercive measures to be implemented from 2022 that only a vaxxed person would be allowed into the office ie the person would probably lose his job if unvaxxed under the Constitution and whether the mRNA vaccine would hv long term adverse effects………….

    Like I said, it is not a simple matter……………the REALITY is that there is no point just RANTING…….and no action…………which has been shown to have NOT effected any change, especially so when the wayang-party MPs just go about their wayanging and in doing so, hope to continue being able to luxuriate in their $16k monthly MP allowance, while many sinkies DIE PREVENTABLE deaths; with miseries and hardships and the adverse effects on the economy.

    Tech: This is indeed a very long and tedious process, better leave it to the professionals, especially when there is more than one litigant. it is also pointless to present your case in a forum like TRE, better leave the details and discussion with a professional lawyer, or else it is all but NATO.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • xoxo:

    First,there must be a strong oppo.
    If not,need a good guy within the PARTY to stop all the nonsense.
    Btw,Davinder Singh will more likely be Davinder $IN when he meets his Maker.

    Money cant buy everything.
    At least not Good Old Heaven.

    Better regret n repent.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Realistically:

    @ Tech:

    >>This is indeed a very long and tedious process, better leave it to the professionals, especially when there is more than one litigant. it is also pointless to present your case in a forum like TRE, better leave the details and discussion with a professional lawyer, or else it is all but NATO.<<

    The REALITY is that very few so called "professional" lawyers would want to take up such cases AGAINST the emperor without clothes regime……….not to mention that the litigant faces quite high obstacles………..especially a LITIGANT IN PERSON who has to navigate the strict requirements of the court stated in the Rules of Court.

    As I hv said b4, I hv NO PROBLEM with the legal ARGUMENTS but the nitty gritty of going through and filtering out the most relevant parts of a case law, the relevant statute laws and the judiciary's attitude and disposition, the FACTUAL MATRIX of the case require a lot of time and concentration…………..

    Tech: You are not reading me correctly, as far as I know, there will be MORE THAN 1 litigant, so ABSOLUTELY NO CHANCE of it being a LIP action. Whatever legal arguments and paperwork will be done by professionals. Understand?

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • By the way ...:

    Cv2.19 Act2020

    “COVID‑19 event” means —
    (a) the COVID‑19 epidemic or pandemic; or
    (b) the operation of or compliance with any law of Singapore or another country or territory, or an order or direction of the Government or any statutory body, or of the government or other public authority of another country or territory, being any law, order or direction that is made by reason of or in connection with COVID‑19;

    I think part b. is against the spirit of FICA … just saying.

    Tech: Err… I think FICA supersedes everything, including the Constitution, the supreme law of the land, no?

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • opposition dude:

    It will fail lah, PAP have got the damn courts on their side to give whatever verdict they want to give.

    As far as they are concerned, only the unvaxxed are spreading the disease. Might as well arrest all unvaxxed people and throw them on Pulau Ubin or some other island and see if the daily cases decline or not (It won’t hor).

    Tech: Why not just shoot them, save the space on Ubin for say, a fishing park or another Sands? lol

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Realistically:

    @ Tech:

    >>You are not reading me correctly, as far as I know, there will be MORE THAN 1 litigant, so ABSOLUTELY NO CHANCE of it being a LIP action. Whatever legal arguments and paperwork will be done by professionals. Understand?<<

    I'm afraid, you don't quite understand the legal process in a judicial review.

    If and when I'm also an applicant for judicial review, my legal arguments and submissions as the the pertinent laws esp. the various Articles of the Constitution; the Statute Laws, if applicable; and the various published articles as to the nature of the mRNA vaccines and the characteristics of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, MIGHT NOT be the same, although i'd expect that they – the published articles – would overlap in many instances, BUT NEVERTHELESS, NOT be the same.

    However, I cannot rule out the possibility that the legal arguments and other submissions are the same as mine, if I'm also an LIP another litigant who is represented by counsel, are the same.

    I don't know of any other litigant/applicant, but since I hv been in contact with the MMTF/MOH by email with my feedback and suggestions I hv a clear advantage in that I can show that I'm making the judicial review application in GOOD FAITH.

    Tech: You are correct, I don’t understand the legal process, which is why the service of lawyers is needed for those who need it. If you wish to proceed LIP, it’s your right, no one is stopping you, but do not present your case on TRE, it’s not the correct platform.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Realistically:

    @ TRE Techie:

    If there are other people interested or better still have appointed counsel to represent him/them in applying for a judicial review, please let me know the name of the counsel so that, hopefully, I could join in as another applicant. Thanks.

    Tech: Yes, there are other possible litigants, which is why it is not a LIP action. Everyone is entitled to the due process of law, there is no reason for you to be excluded from such an action if you so choose to be involved.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • opposition dude:

    Tech: Why not just shoot them, save the space on Ubin for say, a fishing park or another Sands? lol

    Cannot ah, then this will be termed genocide liao ha ha ha ha ha!

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Relax:

    opposition dude:
    It will fail lah, PAP have got the damn courts on their side to give whatever verdict they want to give.

    As far as they are concerned, only the unvaxxed are spreading the disease. Might as well arrest all unvaxxed people and throw them on Pulau Ubin or some other island and see if the daily cases decline or not (It won’t hor).

    Tech: Why not just shoot them, save the space on Ubin for say, a fishing park or another Sands? lol

    Any evidence to prove that unvaxxed are spreading disease? If they have evidence, they will not give excuse as protecting unvaxxed.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • No wonder:

    It is very clear from your first para that your application will FAIL.

    In Singapore, the courts have no rights nor interest in evaluating performance level of ministers.

    Epic mismanagement? Nothing to do for the courts. Singapore is not Brazil or France. In those places, in special cases, ministers face their courts when they perform badly.

    Realistically: As I hv indicated b4, I am prepared to be the applicant for a judicial review of this epic mismanagement of the COVID-19 pandemic based on the FACTS and the Supreme Law of SINKaPOOR, which is the Constitution.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • @No wonder

    Which is why I have been saying, such matters are best left to the professionals.

    BTW, I see a problem in this action. Since ALL litigants are not vaxed (or else they have nothing to cry father and cry mother about), they cannot even go to the law firm representing them because the law firm is in a shopping mall!

    What if there are 10 litigants? They also cannot meet outside at coffee shop right? So lawyers and clients have to discreetly meet in a forest to take instructions? Still have to turn off the tracking app on the mobile lor.

    Pity the unvaxed, all living like thieves like that.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Who Defines Nat Interest?:

    The problem would be if someone can ownself define self interest as national interest

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Who Defines Nat Interest?:

    The Not Publishing of Deaths who are Vaccinated is a sign relating to Integrity and Governance.

    TCB fear ab Erosion of Good Governance.

    I suspect mickey the chosen one is coming from behind to grab the throne.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • NotMyProblem:

    opposition dude: Cannot ah, then this will be termed genocide liao ha ha ha ha ha!

    What about about after vaxxed, still kenna Covid and die? Govt said vaccine protects you but it did not, how? Also same, right?

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • left behind:

    I just get vaccinated. The situation is such that Singapore has one of the highest per square meter of covid-19 cases and everyone is likely get covid-19. So I get vaccinated to get in hope to get some protection against covid-19 if I caught covid-19. The risk is so high now, some protection is better than none. PAP has let in covid-19 by opening the border behind our back and worsen our covid-19 situation by doing nothing workable to save us and instead letting more foreigner which carry covid-19 into Singapore. Our fellow Singaporeans especially seniors are dying and getting sick because of PAP act and PAP doing nothing workable to save us and not admit its wrong doings. PAP should be punished for causing and worsening covid-19 crisis. Let’s hope that we can remove PAP by voting them in the next election.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Realistically:

    @ @ No wonder:
    October 30, 2021 at 12:53 am (Quote)

    Are YOU prepared to put your money where your mouth is? Say $5k?

    $5k is insufficient………..make it $50k..yest FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS.

    From past record, I think YOU are just another of those LOW LIFE troll………which was why I didn’t bother with your earlier low life troll on Lim Tean’s failing to give the link to one article he was commenting on.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • No wonder:

    By the time you go through with your case, you won’t have the money to pay up. It would be immoral to collect winnings from money crowded funded.

    Realistically:
    @ @ No wonder:
    October 30, 2021 at 12:53 am (Quote)

    Are YOU prepared to put your money where your mouth is? Say $5k?

    $5k is insufficient………..make it $50k..yest FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS.

    From past record, I think YOU are just another of those LOW LIFE troll………which was why I didn’t bother with your earlier low life troll on Lim Tean’s failing to give the link to one article he was commenting on.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Harder Truths:

    @Tretechie

    I agree with you (and everyone here) that the challenge has to be made.
    We can do no less. And I will be cheering them on.

    I am just asking people not to get their hopes up and understand who and what we are facing. When the Regime can change the law itself, our arguments are based on what they allow us to use.

    There is no British law here, this is facism at its most vicious.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • @Realistically

    I agree with “No wonder”, an action initiated based on the performance of ministers is destined to fail. IMHO, unless you can prove INTENTIONAL malice and/or gross negligence of the ministers concerned that affects the PUBLIC INTEREST, the courts will not even consider it.

    BTW, there is no need to be overly defensive and challenge the reader to put money where his mouth is. He is entitled to his opinion, as much as you to yours and in this aspect, I agree with him.

    Besides, he mentioned nothing about the money aspect, why then should you even challenge him to pay?

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Realistically:

    @ No wonder:
    October 31, 2021 at 1:08 am (Quote)

    >>By the time you go through with your case, you won’t have the money to pay up. It would be immoral to collect winnings from money crowded funded.<>It is very clear from your first para that your application will FAIL.<< even as YOU failed to refer to which of my post.

    For info/fact, the 1st para of my 1st comment on THIS thread is as follows:

    "As I hv indicated b4, I am prepared to be the applicant for a judicial review of this epic mismanagement of the COVID-19 pandemic based on the FACTS and the Supreme Law of SINKaPOOR, which is the Constitution."

    I'd just repeat that my application for the judicial review (JR) would be "based the FACTS and the Supreme Law of SINKaPOOR, which is the Constitution".

    So where is it in the intended application (if it comes to pass) for JR
    hv I mentioned about the

    "..evaluating performance level of ministers",

    even as I hv stated time and again about the epic mismanagement.

    As for your ignorance/male fide crap about "By the time you go through with your case,you won’t have the money to pay up. It would be immoral to collect winnings from money crowded funded", there is NO NEED for the any JR hearing………….the AR at the CMC would decide, based also on the submission of the AGC whether there is merit or otherwise for my JR (if it comes to pass) to proceed to trial.

    In which case, the cost is manageable……..

    Whether it is moral or immoral for me to collect more $ from YOU than the actual cost incurred is irrelevant……………. the purpose for you to show whether you are bona fide or otherwise and for YOU to show that YOU are actually knowledgeable as to the applicable laws pertaining to JR.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Realistically:

    @ TRE Techie:
    October 31, 2021 at 2:11 am (Quote)

    >>I agree with “No wonder”, an action initiated based on the performance of ministers is destined to fail. IMHO, unless you can prove INTENTIONAL malice and/or gross negligence of the ministers concerned that affects the PUBLIC INTEREST, the courts will not even consider it.<,

    I hv just posted my response to 'No wonder' that my application for a judicial review as regards the measures implemented by the emperor without clothes regime would be based on the MMTF's prohibiting non-vaccinated people from going to malls affecting my (and others in similar circumstance) rights to essential services of businesses located in the malls as guaranteed in the Constitution of the Republic of Singapore.

    I am FULLY aware of the PUBLIC INTEREST element………….which the emperor without clothes (EWC) MMTF had FAILED to safeguard……….from the FACTS/REALITIES as to the outcome of the EWC's MMTF………..which is why I said it would be quite tedious to go through from the very beginning showing in as much detail why the court should intervene.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • opposition dude:

    NotMyProblem: What about about after vaxxed, still kenna Covid and die? Govt said vaccine protects you but it did not, how? Also same, right?

    The main problem is that PAP will never admit that the vaccinated are spreading the virus since the unvaccinated aren’t allowed to dine in nor enter shopping centres but the daily cases are still 3000 per day.

    We all know government loves to talk cock and has thick skin. When they do not want to admit they are wrong they just keep real quiet about said issue while netizens blast them daily for their incompetence. They would rather continue with their stubbornness and stick to their incorrect narrative that vaccination protects you. Don’t be surprised if and when they say the booster is mandatory for all or else you will be considered as unvaccinated even if you have had 2 jabs of it.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • @Realistically

    I have said many times, if this action is to proceed, there will be multiple litigants, represented by professional lawyers. It is not going to be a LIP action.

    You have a fairly good knowledge of the law, it would be best if you share it with the lawyers in this action.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Trust only myself:

    This only goes to show the pathetic state of our political situation, especially the opposition MPs, in protecting the interests and rights of minority groups.

    All these politicians have only one mission in life, earn millions as soon as possible, people dying not their problem…….

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • @Trust only myself

    If there is any blame to go around, then I suppose we should start with Sinkies, for allowing the situation to escalate to the current level.

    Everyone is waiting for someone to do something, resulting in nothing being done in the end.

    And I am expecting this JR action to not proceed as those affected seem to be content with the current situation, bait, hook and sinker.

    Cry father cry mother everyone knows and it’s free, when it comes to taking real and affirmative action, always waiting for the other someone.

    Unless there are massive casualties from the C19, nothing will change in this decade, IMHO.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Realistically:

    @ TRE Techie:
    October 31, 2021 at 6:31 pm (Quote)

    >>I have said many times, if this action is to proceed, there will be multiple litigants, represented by professional lawyers. It is not going to be a LIP action.<<

    Like I hv said, I do NOT need any legal representation, let alone, legal advice.

    I can proceed as a LIP, separately from others who are thinking of a class action.

    There is no stopping others from filing separate applications for judicial review based on their personal/group interests eg, those affected by the intended prohibition of un-vaxxed persons from working in the office.

    As the cases are similar, in that the law and factual matrix are probably the same, the cases can be heard TOGETHER.

    However, we could work together and I hope to tompang on the law firm's clerical resources to help me print out and bind my arguments into a written form for submission to the court. I'm however prepared to pay for the cost of the clerical services.

    Tech: Lawyers are not free and people pay for their services, so there is no such thing as “tompang”. Should you proceed as an LIP, then you are on your own. Even as an LIP, court fees alone would be about S$30,000 ($20,000 deposit), good luck with that.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • No wonder:

    “Be that as it may, we are now able to confirm that there are at least 2 litigants who are seriously intending to mount a Judicial Review challenge to the supposedly extremely discriminatory policies slapped on the un-vaccinated. The litigants are all un-vaccinated and strongly feel that they have been gravely discriminated against and inconvenienced, a blatant violation of their legal rights guaranteed under the Constitution of the Republic of Singapore.”

    Discrimination. This is at least something that the court can consider.

    There are lots of discrimination in gov policies. None has been overturned at the courts.

    If this case succeeds, there will be a tsunami of similar cases.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • @No wonder

    For this action to even stand a chance of being considered, the focus IMHO, should be on the vaccine, i.e. it being a fallacy that it can prevent infections, injuries and deaths. Scientific studies, evidence and solid stats would be the key. This would be a very heavy-burden case, should it proceed.

    Since science is still dilly dallying on the C19, it may be very hard to convinced the judge, the best bet is to bury the judge with overwhelming scientific studies and hopefully some restrictions may be lifted/amended. To absolutely win the case is IMHO, absolutely impossible unless the Sun rises from the North.

    Anyway, if you ask me, then I must say that this case is likely to NOT proceed because other than the initial litigants, no one (vax or not) will be interested in the case, despite the fact that the policies may cause them to lose their jobs and will be greatly inconvenienced.

    Sinkies have been trained to be very “obedient”, so they are accustomed to swallowing bait, hook and sinker without any questions asked, even if it means their loved ones would die, their babies may be born deformed or sick or they may even lose their jobs.

    Even for the minority who may feel aggrieved, they may cry father cry mother on social media but they won’t join in the action, always waiting for someone else to fight the battle for them.

    A case of everyone waiting for someone to do something resulting in nothing being done by anyone.

    But I may be wrong, only time will tell.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • MarBowling:

    TRE Techie:
    November 1, 2021 at 5:07 am (Quote)
    @No wonder

    For this action to even stand a chance of being considered, the focus IMHO, should be on the vaccine, i.e. it being a fallacy that it can prevent infections, injuries and deaths. Scientific studies, evidence and solid stats would be the key. This would be a very heavy-burden case, should it proceed.

    Since science is still dilly dallying on the C19, it may be very hard to convinced the judge, the best bet is to bury the judge with overwhelming scientific studies and hopefully some restrictions may be lifted/amended. To absolutely win the case is IMHO, absolutely impossible unless the Sun rises from the North.

    Anyway, if you ask me, then I must say that this case is likely to NOT proceed because other than the initial litigants, no one (vax or not) will be interested in the case, despite the fact that the policies may cause them to lose their jobs and will be greatly inconvenienced.

    Sinkies have been trained to be very “obedient”, so they are accustomed to swallowing bait, hook and sinker without any questions asked, even if it means their loved ones would die, their babies may be born deformed or sick or they may even lose their jobs.

    Even for the minority who may feel aggrieved, they may cry father cry mother on social media but they won’t join in the action, always waiting for someone else to fight the battle for them.

    A case of everyone waiting for someone to do something resulting in nothing being done by anyone.

    But I may be wrong, only time will tell.

    Response: Wow. You have HIT THE BULL’S EYE! 62.14% HAD CONFIRMED THAT!

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Singaporeans R Free Riders:

    TRE Techie:
    @No wonder

    Which is why I have been saying, such matters are best left to the professionals.

    BTW, I see a problem in this action. Since ALL litigants are not vaxed (or else they have nothing to cry father and cry mother about), they cannot even go to the law firm representing them because the law firm is in a shopping mall!

    What if there are 10 litigants? They also cannot meet outside at coffee shop right? So lawyers and clients have to discreetly meet in a forest to take instructions? Still have to turn off the tracking app on the mobile lor.

    Pity the unvaxed, all living like thieves like that.

    Meet in forest ??? Ah hahahahaha… well said.. Oppie supporters are so brainless.

    I think they use the crowd funded money to pay your $20,000 is better than their current action.

    Hahahahaha…I also pity these group of people. You take responsibility for your action. Period… don’t cry over your spill milk.

    PAP supporters please print/distribute/share my post.
    In Dollar$ We Tru$t. Prai$e the Dollar$. Glory be with the Dollar$

    GE2024.PAP.Guarantee.Win.Again
    Majullah $PAP$ $PAP$ Huat$ Huat$ Huat$
    Singaporeans must be Cheaperer, Betterer, Fasterer
    Workers must accept wage sacrifices to keep businesses going.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Not entirely so...:

    The authorities have made concessions for unvaxxed to enter malls.

    -People who are unable to be vaccinated due medical reasons
    -People who need to access medical services
    -People who do not fall into the above can also access, with a negative ART result.

    The court will rule that unvaxxed CAN ENTER MALLS. and that the authorities have provided alternatives.

    Employers also have the right to terminate employees who are absent Not because they are unvaxxed. The employee can still enter the mall provided an ART was done with a negative result.

    Be succinct in crafting the challenge, otherwise it will be just media entertainment… at a very expensive price, borne by the litigants. Lawyers look at it as purely as money to be made. They are not moralists or charities.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Realistically:

    @ No wonder:
    October 31, 2021 at 11:20 pm

    So I take it that YOU have no response to my debunking of what YOU have posted, since YOU hv failed to address the issues I hv raised……..especially that YOU have NO knowledge of the core fundamental jurisprudence principles especially what the CJ had in a previous judgment termed ADJECTIVAL LAW & the THRESHOLD for striking out…in reference to your claim that my action would “FAIL”.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Realistically:

    @ TRE Techie:
    November 1, 2021 at 5:07 am (Quote)

    >>For this action to even stand a chance of being considered, the focus IMHO, should be on the vaccine, i.e. it being a fallacy that it can prevent infections, injuries and deaths.<<

    I think you should get better acquainted of the concept of being LEGALLY and FACTUALLY sustainable as the THRESHOLD for striking out.

    The scientific evidence as regards the VACCINE would be relevant in considering the FACTUAL basis………..but it is only a part of the legal consideration…………..what's MORE important is/are the CAUSES of action……….and how to support the said causes with LEGAL arguments – whether written and or oral.

    Tech: Me no lawyer, which is why I say better leave legal issues to professionals. I only TCSS nia.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • can ever be woken:

    //Even for the minority who may feel aggrieved, they may cry father cry mother on social media but they won’t join in the action, always waiting for someone else to fight the battle for them.//

    well, blame it on the white idiots and gang who is very successful in creating a daft culture for daft sinkies and therefore need 6.9m or 10m open-leg policy to wake up daft sinkies lor (if daft sinkies can ever be woken ??) ??

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • inside is not within:

    //what’s MORE important is/are the CAUSES of action……….and how to support the said causes with LEGAL arguments – whether written and or oral.//

    wow so super chim legal arguments hor ??? sinkie land lar, 4 = 5 selected = elected, is this legal enough lar (wink wink) ?? are you referring to legal mindfield, like “inside is not within” ???

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Realistically:

    @ Tech:

    >>Me no lawyer, which is why I say better leave legal issues to professionals. I only TCSS nia.<<

    Me oso NO lawyer……….BUT according to Justice Choo Han Teck, my arguments were "NOVEL"……..PLUS JC's comment that: "I notice that Mr Bin has done research into the law and has taken pains to prepare for this case. When I asked him earlier (if he was a LAWYER)…".

    Readers might like to reflect on Justice Choo's use of the word "NOVEL"….

    Being NOT a lawyer, I am NOT giving ANY LEGAL ADVICE nor offered any. I only share my experience.

    Back to the issues concerned:

    My comments based on the NOT UNREASONABLE assumption – based on case law – that my case, if it comes to pass, IS JUSTICIABLE.

    With that, I'd end my comments on the JR matter, except that I'd also make further comment on what I considers the low life form person posting as 'No Wonder'….

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • wuchiens:

    Not entirely so...:
    The authorities have made concessions for unvaxxed to enter malls.

    -People who are unable to be vaccinated due medical reasons
    -People who need to access medical services
    -People who do not fall into the above can also access, with a negative ART result.

    The court will rule that unvaxxed CAN ENTER MALLS. and that the authorities have provided alternatives.

    Employers also have the right to terminate employees who are absent Not because they are unvaxxed. The employee can still enter the mall provided an ART was done with a negative result.

    Be succinct in crafting the challenge, otherwise it will be just media entertainment… at a very expensive price, borne by the litigants. Lawyers look at it as purely as money to be made. They are not moralists or charities.

    In my opinion an alternative is not a viable alternative if it is done at a great cost or inconvenience to the affected. Seriously, who in the right mind would pay $30, $50 EVERYDAY for an ART just to be able to go to work? That equals to $600 to $1000 a month which is a significant chunk of most salaried workers and is definitely not practical in any sense.

    Similarly, South Africa in the 70s and 80s granted “Honorary White” status to Japanese, Chinese, Taiwanese and Koreans living there on a case-by-case basis which allowed them to be exempt from all the discriminatory rules facing the non-Whites then. Heck, even blacks with special skills could be exempted. There were alternatives to Apartheid then but no one would dream to claim that South Africa was not practicing Apartheid.

    Hence the test should be whether the current rules pose:
    1. a significant restriction of personal freedoms and also
    2. the current alternatives are unrealistic and pose too high a burden in cost and time for most people.

    If Singapore wants to open up, they should just adopt the stance of the Nordic countries and lift all restrictions including the wearing of masks, TT app, social distancing etc. which have all been proven to be more or less useless in the current situation. Either that, or lockdown all now and follow the PRC/HK/Taiwan/Macau Zero COVID model.

    We are neither here nor there, “endemic” and “living with the virus” in Singapore means greater restrictions for both the vaxxed and unvaxxed. It is a total failure of policy.

    Would welcome more on how this argument can be crafted.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • No wonder:

    Mr Bin, do you read comments properly?

    My earlier comment is that your request for a judicial review of the MTF “epic mismanagement” will definitely fail. The reason is that Singapore courts do not evaluate minister performance.

    All your rambling about your legal knowledge/experience and other stuff is irrelevant. Even if you were a experienced lawyer with a long unbroken record of winnings, you would still FAIL.

    Realistically: With that, I’d end my comments on the JR matter, except that I’d also make further comment on what I considers the low life form person posting as ‘No Wonder’….

    No wonder: It is very clear from your first para that your application will FAIL.

    In Singapore, the courts have no rights nor interest in evaluating performance level of ministers.

    Epic mismanagement? Nothing to do for the courts. Singapore is not Brazil or France. In those places, in special cases, ministers face their courts when they perform badly.

    Realistically: As I hv indicated b4, I am prepared to be the applicant for a judicial review of this epic mismanagement of the COVID-19 pandemic based on the FACTS and the Supreme Law of SINKaPOOR, which is the Constitution.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • @Not entirely so…

    If I have a bungalow and I dig a hole big enough for a puppy to crawl through, which means you also can enter on bended knees, you want to enter or not? While I allow the meis meis to enter through the front gate?

    Will you be asking why we all friends, you must enter my bungalow on bended knees while the meis meis can enter through the front gate, rite?

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • succinct or not:

    //Be succinct in crafting the challenge, otherwise it will be just media entertainment…//

    yar lor, when one side can wayang (succinct or not ??) because got power to do so (and not considered entertainment hor ?), the other side must be succinct hor ???

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Realistically:

    @ No wonder:
    November 1, 2021 at 1:15 pm (Quote)

    >>Mr Bin, do you read comments properly?

    My earlier comment is that your request for a judicial review of the MTF “epic mismanagement” will definitely fail. The reason is that Singapore courts do not evaluate minister performance.<<

    I think you are just another of the PAPies' running puppy……..out to try to discredit me as much as possible in the hope that any crowdfunding effort should not succeed. it is now clear to me that YOU are the 走狗…….that so-called oppos like Lim Tean and Chee Soon Juan are better alternatives as compared to a person like me who is able to call out the abuse of power and the adverse consequences of his epic failures.

    As for you attempt to wriggle your way out of YOUR own crap which I've quoted you, I have ALREADY debunked you……..that my causes of action is NOT about the "epic mismanagement" of the emperor without clothes regime, but the various BREACHES of the Constitution affecting my Constitutional and human rights.

    With that, I end my case, except to quickly add to the comments by @ wuchiens:
    November 1, 2021 at 12:45 pm

    Tech: You ar, dunno what to say you. Just because someone disagrees with you, you have to resort to name-calling issit? Die die must win issit? Got some class can or not?

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Realistically:

    @ wuchiens:
    November 1, 2021 at 12:45 pm

    >>In my opinion an alternative is not a viable alternative if it is done at a great cost or inconvenience to the affected. <<

    I fully agree with you. Those discriminatory measures still breach and violate my CONSTITUTIONAL and human right to health.

    I'd refrain from responding to the person you replied to as I believe he is just another of the emperor without clothes' 走狗

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • 400 Rolls Royces:

    TRE Techie:
    @Not entirely so…

    If I have a bungalow and I dig a hole big enough for a puppy to crawl through, which means you also can enter on bended knees, you want to enter or not? While I allow the meis meis to enter through the front gate?

    Will you be asking why we all friends, you must enter my bungalow on bended knees while the meis meis can enter through the front gate, rite?

    Hello Techie, why in the world should I dig a hole for outside puppies to crawl into my bungalow, a private property? lol

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • No wonder:

    “In the meantime, to protect the privacy of these litigants, TRE will not be releasing their particulars.”

    If someone really wants to lead the case, then privacy should not be an issue. When you go to court, your names will be out for everyone to see.

    For people who are thinking of joining, they need to know who they are following. For example, if it is that “realistical” person leading, don’t waste our time and money.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • @No wonder

    No one is officially “leading” at this current point in time, all pertinent information will be released after the 7 days period when the ‘invitation’ is closed and a “leader” is decided.

    Currently, TRE is helping to collect, collaborate and corroborate the information received and will also be helping to work out the finer details to enable the action to proceed and the “leader” will take it from thereon.

    What we can reveal now is that we contacted 3 law firms on this possible action and have tentatively decided to go with Ms Thya of Carson Law.

    Again, nothing is concrete at this moment in time, all will be finalised after 7th November 2021 and the action should commence sometime mid-November.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Wow, MTF now more garang, wants to make unvax pay for medical wor. KNN, not scared people tuland lor.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • can tahan or not:

    // MTF now more garang, wants to make unvax pay for medical wor. KNN, not scared people tuland lor.//

    aiyoh ? the white idiots are signaling ? see whose knuckle is harder lor ?? see whether the unvaccinated can tahan or not ?? where got scared, each one of them is well compensated even for one term to weather any eventualities ???

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Kudos:

    https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/falsified-data-pfizer-vaccine-trial-had-major-flaws-whistleblower-tells-peer-reviewed

    A whistleblower involved in Pfizer’s pivotal phase III Covid-19 vaccine trial has leaked evidence to a notable peer-reviewed medical publication that poor practices at the contract research company she worked for raise questions about data integrity and regulatory oversight.

    Brook Jackson, a now-fired regional director at Ventavia Research Group, revealed to The BMJ that vaccine trials at several sites in Texas last year had major problems – including falsified data, broke fundamental rules, and were ‘slow’ to report adverse reactions.

    When she notified superiors of the issues she found, they fired her.

    _____________________________

    So it seems like PAP paid with tax payers money and injected millions of sinkies with a fake vaccine.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • No wonder:

    This looks similar to the Boeing Max crashes. Boeing self approved its own plane. The result: hundreds of people died.

    If the drug companies are self approving their drugs/vaccines, a billion people will be affected.

    Kudos:
    https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/falsified-data-pfizer-vaccine-trial-had-major-flaws-whistleblower-tells-peer-reviewed

    A whistleblower involved in Pfizer’s pivotal phase III Covid-19 vaccine trial has leaked evidence to a notable peer-reviewed medical publication that poor practices at the contract research company she worked for raise questions about data integrity and regulatory oversight.

    Brook Jackson, a now-fired regional director at Ventavia Research Group, revealed to The BMJ that vaccine trials at several sites in Texas last year had major problems – including falsified data, broke fundamental rules, and were ‘slow’ to report adverse reactions.

    When she notified superiors of the issues she found, they fired her.

    _____________________________

    So it seems like PAP paid with tax payers money and injected millions of sinkies with a fake vaccine.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...

Leave a Reply

 characters available


Scroll Down For More Interesting Stuff


Member Services
Self-SupportMembers LoginSelf-Support
Sponsored Advertisement
Search On TR Emeritus
Sponsored Advertisement
Announcement
Advertisements
Visitors Statistic
Latest Statistic

UA-67043412-1