include("cmp.php");
Archive for the ‘Opinions’ Category
Why content “grabbing” is different from normal “browsing”

Why content “grabbing” is different from normal “browsing”

Some readers defended SPH on the ground that its employee or bot might be simply "browsing" our site for "research" purposes and blamed us for hanging him/her out to dry. However, content "grabbing" is not equivalent to innocucous "browsing" which explained why we raised the alarm bells based on the advice given by our system... 

第四代领导人

第四代领导人

作者:陈钦亮 我读报得悉总理正在寻找带领新加坡走向未来的第四代领导团队而感到失望。新加坡人肯定地对这件事应该拥有发言权吧? 我认为最好让团队在现实情况下诚实地面对试验,并且争取人民的接纳,而不是由当前的领导人去钦点。 许多民主国家... 

A Freudian slip? Mr Geoffrey’s admission that SPH staff DID ACCESS Temasek Review during the period when the alleged “grabbing” of our content take place

A Freudian slip? Mr Geoffrey’s admission that SPH staff DID ACCESS Temasek Review during the period when the alleged “grabbing” of our content take place

OPINION [Read our latest rebuttal to Mr Geoffrey Pereira's second article on 13 November 2009 here] For the first time in the media history of Singapore, the state media actually bothered to put up an article to refute claims made by a blog, or is it? Straits Times journalist Geoffrey Pereira published an article on his ST blog... 



Official Quick Links
Members LoginContact UsSupport Us
Sponsored Advertisement
Search On TR Emeritus
Sponsored Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Announcement

UA-67043412-1