
So many unanswered questions on AIM-PAP
This is a response to the 26-paragraph, four-page statement given by Dr Teo Ho Pin, the informal coordinating chairman of PAP town councils, who gave this explanation in a statement outlining why and how the town councils came to have a sale and lease back deal with the PAP-owned Action Information Management (Aim). The statement...

S$25,030 Dollar Question on AIM Scandal
The $25,030 Dollar Question still unanswered about the AIM scandal: Why? Why do the deal at all? Why sell public property into party political hands for a pitance? Teo Ho Pin and the PAP have been scratching around in a state of panic to justify the deal that has had Singaporean's scratching their heads for weeks. On releasing...

$2.05M EC Penthouse – A Case of No Winners?
Over the weekend, you might have heard about a $2.05 million Executive Condominium being sold in a scant 2 hours after booking began at 10am. This has certainly created quite a buzz. Some questioned the high price, while others were shocked with the size and overt luxury afforded in the public housing sphere, all subsidised...
|
|
|
|
- “懒X” 视频。 on 2025大选—明确授权,变化中的政治格局
- China Fan on Strong hailstorm strikes China’s Xi’an causing airport roof leaks, hundreds of cars destroyed
- Brokeneck on The Nation has rejected multi-party Parliamentary representation
- 公孙羊 on 2025大选—明确授权,变化中的政治格局
- Harder Truths on GE2025: Stunning victory for PAP
|