FamiLee feud: What should have happened in the Parliament
The Opposition Party should have thoroughly questioned the accused, in this case: the Prime Minister. Since all these allegations come with supporting evidence, the Opposition Party should have also tabled a non-confidence motion in the PM. Since the party whip had been lifted, members of the ruling party could choose side....
Right platform to explain himself?
PM Lee has voiced out the clearest reason yet on why he needed to bring the family dispute of Oxley Road into Parliament. In Singapore's context, the role of Prime Minister is the person who commands the confidence of the majority of MPs, if not all. That is why as PM he has a duty to all MPs to respond to the allegations thrown...
So many holes in the statements in Parliament? (Part 3)
I refer to the article “Oxley Road: Full transcript and video of ministerial statement in Parliament by PM Lee Hsien Loong” (Straits Times, Jul 3). It states that “So at the next Cabinet meeting, two days after the Parliament Sitting, I recused myself from all discussions and decisions relating to the house, and placed...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Papa PARDON Son Democracy SRFR on 2025大选—明确授权，变化中的政治格局
- Hailongjuan on Strong hailstorm strikes China’s Xi’an causing airport roof leaks, hundreds of cars destroyed
- ganeshsk on GE2025: Stunning victory for PAP
- Hokkein gang in pap on A a jaw-dropping election
- Pap are cheaters on A a jaw-dropping election
|
|