
Why waste time camping in the house?
Is there a necessity to respond to MP Murali's amended motion when the WP knows that it will be passed by 83 PAP MPs who were already instructed to vote for it? Why waste time camping in the House and trying to persuade MP Murali to withdraw his amended motion? Come on Ms Indranee. Don't try to fool us by telling us that WP...

Did Shanmugam Breach the Constitution When He Discussed the High Court Judgement in the Parti Liyani Case?
Justice Chan Article 99 of the Singapore Constitution states: The conduct of a Judge of the Supreme Court or a Judicial Commissioner, a Senior Judge or an International Judge of the Supreme Court shall not be discussed in Parliament except on a substantive motion of which notice has been given by not less than one-quarter of...

Is Parliament the final court of appeal?
Last week, Singaporeans witnessed how our Parliament was used to run down a defenceless Indonesian domestic worker, criticise her lawyer for an alleged technical oversight which resulted in the appeal judge reaching an erroneous conclusion on the motive of Liew Mun Leong when he lodged a police report. Unproven new evidence...
|
|
|
|
- Papa PARDON Son Democracy SRFR on A False Analogy That Insults the Intelligence of Singaporeans
- Harder Truths on A False Analogy That Insults the Intelligence of Singaporeans
- Harder Truths on Hougang Belongs to the People
- Harder Truths on Its all about trust
- Harder Truths on Misunderstanding What Singaporeans Truly Expect from Good Governance
|