Why should Singpaoreans and PRs be lumped together for employment statistics?
Why did the government lump Singaporeans and PRs together when tabulating statistics for local employment? So as not to pit Singaporeans against PRs? Obviously not. I believe the most probable reason for lumping these two components together is to confuse the populace regarding the actual number of employment created for native...
Thank you, Dr. Chee!
Even though we are a democratic country, Singaporeans have lost the basic right to question the government which we had voted in. We have many questions on the PAP’s nonsense, and we demand answers on CECA, CPF, Mrs. Pinky’s salary, etc. Of course, many Singaporeans were coerced into voting for PAP as they painted a very...
Why?
1. Despite having billions of budget surplus from each financial year but the gov intends to increase GST. 2. NUS & NTU having a combined reserve funds of $12 billion, university fees are still on the rise. 3. PUB has made steady profits in excess of over $100 million after gov grants for almost a decade but our electricity...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- opposition dude on Tan Chuan Jin has picked up himself from the affair saga
- No change on Lawrence Wong has taken the less than conventional pathway
- OMEN 1505 on Lawrence Wong has taken the less than conventional pathway
- Nathan on Lawrence Wong has taken the less than conventional pathway
- rice on How governments print money
- 孔乙己 on Tan Chuan Jin has picked up himself from the affair saga
- rice on Tan Chuan Jin has picked up himself from the affair saga
- Relax on Scoring brownie points using K2 students’ graduation
- Dr Tan Tai Weias on Tan Chuan Jin has picked up himself from the affair saga
- 老人王 （King of the Elderly) on The pomposity of PM Lee Hsien Loong’s career achievements
- They ask for it. on Lawrence Wong has taken the less than conventional pathway
