Why should Singpaoreans and PRs be lumped together for employment statistics?
Why did the government lump Singaporeans and PRs together when tabulating statistics for local employment? So as not to pit Singaporeans against PRs? Obviously not. I believe the most probable reason for lumping these two components together is to confuse the populace regarding the actual number of employment created for native...
We can get you the numbers, but you don’t need to know
I refer to this article on Today. Basically, in Parliament on 6th January, the PAP declared that Singaporeans are getting more jobs, 60,000 local employment. Mr Pritam Singh requested for the specific number in terms of PRs and Singaporeans. However, Mr Chan Chun Sing vehemently refused to answer that question. 1) Mr Chan deflected...
Thank you, Dr. Chee!
Even though we are a democratic country, Singaporeans have lost the basic right to question the government which we had voted in. We have many questions on the PAP’s nonsense, and we demand answers on CECA, CPF, Mrs. Pinky’s salary, etc. Of course, many Singaporeans were coerced into voting for PAP as they painted a very...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- PAP mandate strong on A a jaw-dropping election
- 2 MAIN FACTORS on A a jaw-dropping election
- Senior Cirizen Ah Seng on A a jaw-dropping election
- Jets that flew off on A a jaw-dropping election
- Mushroom Parties on Four parties lost their election deposits in GE2025
|
|