TR EMERITUS

OPINION It is disturbing that PAP strongman Lee Kuan Yew who just passed his 87th birthday lately, had received numerous well-wishes from misinformed Singaporeans and foreigners alike for his "feat" in transforming Singapore from "third world to first" in a single generation which were given extensive publicity by the sycophantic Singapore media. Much of Lee's so-called accomplishments have been over-hyped which does little justice to the contributions of his fellow colleagues and other Singaporeans. Even so, the greatest misinformation which has been perpetuated over the years is the myth that Singapore has achieved "First World" status. The concept of "First World" first came about during the Cold War where it was useed to describe democratic and capitalistic countries which were aligned with the United States against the former Soviet Union. After the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991, the term "First World" has come to be associated with highly developed countries which have very advanced economies and very high Human Development Indices. However, there is no fixed set of criteria to determine if a country belongs to the First or Third World. The United Nations defined First World on the wealth of the nation's Gross National Product (GNP) and Singapore joined the First World Club in 2000. For the purpose of discussion here, we will use the UN Human Development Index on which Singapore is ranked 23th (read more here) Though Singapore is considered a First World by economic indicators like GNP and GDP, it does not share the other attributes commonly found among first world nations. While our economy has the highest GDP (PPP) per capita in Asia at $49,288 according to a World Bank report (source: Wikipedia), our people do not enjoy a quality of life which commensurate with it. 1. High domestic wages: The citizens of First World nations (on the Human Development Index) all enjoy high domestic wages and purchasing power which is not found in other developing countries. According to the worldwide study conducted and released by UBS lately, titled “Price and Earnings 2009″, Singaporeans have low domestic wages and purchasing power which is comparable to Third World countries rather than First World ones. (download the study here) Singapore has a GDP (PPP) per capita higher than Switzerland, but our wages are way below that of the Swiss. The UBS study found that employees in Copenhagen, Zurich, Geneva and New York have the highest gross earnings. With its extremely high gross wages and comparatively low tax rates, Switzerland is a very employee-friendly country. Zurich and Geneva have wage indices (gross) of 119.8 and 107.5 respectively. In contrast, Singapore has a wage index of only 31.3, comparable with Moscow (30.9), Tallinn (28.7) and Johannesburg (26.7). In the Asia-Pacific region, it is exceeded by Tokyo (83.0), Sydney (74.1), Auckland (44.1), Hong Kong (42.3), Taipei (35.5) and Seoul (32.3) 2. High purchasing power: Based on the same UBS report, Singaporeans have a low purchasing power which is not compatible with that of First World Countries. It has purchasing power of only 39.9, comparable to Kuala Lumpur (39.5), Warsaw (34.0) and Bogota (33.7). Other countries in the Asia-Pacific region which are ahead of us are Tokyo (82.2), Auckland (68.9), Taipei (58.9), Hong Kong (58.1) and Seoul (57.4). In other words, though the cost of living is higher in Tokyo, the average Japanese has a domestic purchasing power more than twice that of an average Singaporean. Though Malaysia is still a developing country and has a GDP (PPP) per capita of only $14,215, less than 3 times of ours, the ordinary Malaysian citizen has about the same domestic purchasing power as the Singaporean. 3. Low income gap between the rich and the poor: First World countries generally have low income gap between the rich and the poor as exemplified by the low Gini Coefficient of Norway, Australia, Canada, Iceland, Ireland, Netherlands, Sweden, France, Switzerland and Japan: Singapore has the highest income gap among the thirty most developed economies in the world after Hong Kong which is part of China. In fact, its income gap is comparable to that of Third World countries like Kenya, Mexico and Nepal. 4. High quality of life: The citizens of most First World countries enjoy a high quality of life as measured by the authoritative Quality of Life Index (read more here) The countries with the highest scores are France, Australia, Switzerland, Germany, New Zealand, Luxembourg, United States, Belgium and Canada. Singapore is ranked a miserable 70th place. The index is produced based on the following nine categories: cost of living, culture and leisure, economy, environment, freedom, health, infrastructure, safety and risk and climate. Each country in each category is graded on a curve and it is scored relative to every other country. The scores run 0 to 100 for each category. This means the country that gets 0 is the worst in that category, and the country that gets 100 is the best. The data is collated from official government sources, the World Health Organization, The Economist, and many other journals, tables, and records. Below is Singapore’s scores for each category: While Singapore scores high on risk and safety, health and infrastructure, it scores poorly in environment and freedom, bringing down its final score to a mediocre 61. Environment and Freedom each contributed 10 per cent to the countries’ overall score: Environment (10%). To figure a country’s score in this category, we look at population density per square kilometer, population growth rate, greenhouse emissions per capita, and the percentage of total land that is protected. Freedom (10%). Freedom House’s survey is the main source for these scores, with an emphasis on a citizen’s political rights and civil liberties. 5. Social welfare and security for the aged: Most First World countries provide a comprehensive social safety net for their citizens so that they do not have to worry about their lives after retirement. For example in Australia, Canada and the Nordic states, the healthcare expenses of the people are all taken care of by the state. Though their taxes are higher than that of Singapore, their workers enjoy higher domestic wages and purchasing power as well. In contrast, Singaporeans are implored time and again to work as long as possible till they drop dead and die, the latest call coming from PAP strongman Lee Kuan Yew who mooted the idea of scraping the retirement age altogether. While the senior citizens of other First World countries spend their twilight years taking care of their grandchildren or pursuing their hobbies, Singaporeans have to work as cardboard collectors, security guards and dish washers just to meet ends meet. 6. Vibrant multi-party democracies with independent institutions and media: According to Reform Party Secretary-General and Cambridge-educated economist Mr Kenneth Jeyaretnam, "Singapore’s per capita GDP is one of the highest in the world but at the same time Freedom House rates Singapore as near the bottom of the partially free countries with a score of 4 (where 1 is most free) for civil liberties and 5 for political rights." (read more here) If we look at the top twenty countries by nominal GDP in 2008 as measured by the IMF, World Bank and CIA, we find that between 85% and 95% of the countries on the list rated between 1 and 1.5 for the combined average rating for political rights and civil liberties. The countries that did not fall into the category of free states were all oil exporters with low populations such as Qatar and Kuwait (though Kuwait rates as slightly freer than Singapore). You can argue about the direction of causation. However also consider that Singapore finds itself in the company of some of the world’s poorest countries in its ranking in the Freedom House Index. These include Pakistan, Nigeria, Haiti, Uganda and the Central African Republic. All the First World countries which are ranked within the top thirty on the UN Human Development Index are fully functioning democracies with Singapore being an exception. These countries also have a relatively independent and free press which is not found in Singapore. The Singapore media is ranked a pathetic 133th in terms of press freedom on the World Press Freedom index in 2009 among the likes of Russia, Burundi and Kenya while the countries with the most free press are the First World countries of Denmark, Finland, Ireland, Norway and Iceland. (read more here) Conclusion Contrary to what was proclaimed by the PAP regime and publicized by the Singapore media, Singapore is NOT a First World country yet. We only have First World GNP and GDP figures, but NOT First World wages, quality of life and political freedom. The Singapore "miracle" is not entirely "miraculous" after all based on Nobel Economics Laureate Paul Krugman's assessment of Singapore: ‎"The Singapore’s miracle turned out to have been based on perspiration rather than inspiration: Singapore grew through a mobilization of resources that would have done Stalin proud." Singapore's economic growth for decade or so was and is still fueled largely by the relentless influx of cheap foreign workers which help keep business costs low, increase the profit margins of companies and thereby boosting the GDP and GNP figures artificially in the process and this is only possible in a repressive fascist totalitarian state like Singapore where its people find it almost impossible to vote out the ruling party. In the meantime, the median wages of ordinary Singaporeans remain stagnant at $2,400 monthly even as the cost of living has escalated, especially that of public housing. The political system of a country is closely linked to its economic performance and quality of life. Under the unique political system of Singapore which resembles more of a totalitarian fascist repressive state like North Korea, only the PAP ministers, associates and elites benefit directly from the country's economic growth and not ordinary Singaporeans who are struggling to make ends meet. Unless Singaporeans vote out the despotic PAP regime and revamp its archaic political system which lacks independence checks and balances on the executive, Singapore will never be able to fulfil its full potential of becoming a genuine First World country where its citizens enjoy a truly First World standard of living.   The UBS Series: >> Part 1: Singapore has lowest wages and domestic purchasing power among Asian Tigers >> Part 2: Moving towards a Russian standard of living >> Part 3: Why Singaporeans are paupers in a first world economy   Related articles: >> How the PAP plays around with statistics > > Singapore is not becoming a province of China >> Native Singaporeans may make up only 50 per cent of population >> Import foreign talents, but real ones please >> The crux of Singpore immigration problem (Chinese) >> Singaporeans voice concerns at foreigner issue during dialogue sessions >> PM Lee’s out of touch National Day Rally speech >> Immigrants will prepare young Singaporeans for more competition >> Singaporeans must accept controlled flow of foreign talents >> Netizens unimpressed by PM Lee’s National Day Rally speech >> Mass immigration won’t affect ethnic composition >> Urgent need for population debate in Singapore >> The fallacy of using lax immigration policies to solve low fertility and aging population issues >> PAP mass-recruiting Taiwanese PMETs to compete with Singaporeans >> Halimah Yacob: Not true that employers hiring foreigners over Singaporeans >> Conversation with a PRC prostitute given Singapore PR by the PAP >> Teo Chee Hean: PAP’s immigration policy has always been “strict” >> How the PAP allows foreigners into Singapore to compete with locals for jobs >> Why Singaporeans ‘fear’ of new immigrants is absolutely rational >> SM Goh reassures immigrants that they are still welcomed in Singapore >> Singaporean working in China lashed out at grouses of Singapore PRs >> Eight reasons why foreign workers will be preferred over local ones >> Declining wages of Singaporeans and the continued denial by PAP leaders >> Halimah Yacob refutes UBS study findings >> Halimah Yacob: Productivity drive will be derailed if foreign worker challenge not addressed  >> Exposing the six major flaws in the PAP’s immigration policies >> Wong Kan Seng promises to tighten immigration policies >> SM Goh: Foreign workers numbers may still rise >> Malaysian car mechanic applying for Singapore citizenship >> PAP launches Singapore Citizenship Journey to help new citizens integrate >> Compulsory for new citizens to attend “sharing sessions” with grassroots leaders >> Wong Kan Seng urged Singaporeans to be more tolerant of foreign workers >> Tharman: Foreign workers increase income of low-income families >> Sylvia Lim: Pace and influx of foreigners over last few years is wrong >> Amy Khor urges Singaporeans to welcome foreigners >> PAP MP wants more money to be spent to make new citizens feel welcomed in Singapore >> Shanmugam: Foreigners generate jobs for Singaporeans >> Vivian happy there are 4,500 new citizens serving as grassroots leaders >> Cosmetic changes made to immigration policy >> SM Goh: New immigrants needed to make up population shortfall >> PAP ministers hailed contributions of foreigners >> SM Goh expressed support for Zhang Yuanyuan >> State media: citizens have more rights over PRs >> Zhang Yuanyuan got her Singapore PR in only 2 months >> Official reply from government on the Zhang Yuanyuan fiasco >> Singapore PRC PR proclaimed loyalty to China publicly >> PRC resident hung China flag to celebrate its National Day >> PRC student in Singapore wants more scholarships for foreigners >> PRC prostitutes solicit for customers on Singapore’s cyberspace >> ERA: 40 per cent of resale flats buyers are PRs   Please join our Facebook page here and invite your friends to do so to create awareness of the current affairs affecting Singaporeans. Please use our online web form to contact us.  Read More →

Having obtained a Bachelor's degree after six years of part-time study, all the 100 job applications sent out had sunk deep into the ocean. A degree holder in Science, Mr Zeng Yongguang, 41, said, "I quitted my IT support position in April and have been actively hunting for another job for six months. The results are discouraging." Yongguang and his wife resides in Sengkang. His wife is four months pregnant. Half a year has passed and he is still jobless. He is at a lost. Meanwhile, life gets by from his wife's $1500 pm as a clerical officer. "I thought with a degree it is easier to get a job. Hence I signed up UniSIM's night course in 2002 and studied there for six years. I graduated in 2008." "In this half-year period, I emailed and mailed a hundred resumes to IT companies, requesting for $3000 pm. I did not get a single chance of an interview." Six months without income has forced Yongguang to pawn his watch and the ring which he gave his wife in exchange for a thousand dollars to settle his PUB and other miscellaneous fees. He is not a demanding person. He just wants a job - a stable income to support his family. In order to get a job as a waiter, he even lowered his demands by not disclosing his qualifications. Still, he was rejected. He said, "To make ends meet, I can work on anything, so I tell them I am an O-Level grad." "The restaurant manager asked me if I had any experiences; the KTV manager asked me if I could hold liquor well. I shook my head. They turned me down without even wanting to let me learn from scratch." Zeng Yongguang did a self analysis. With the tight competitiveness right now, all bosses tend towards younger, lower-paid, and higher-educated talents. He confesses that he is much older in age and this will set him in a disadvantage. However, he stresses that he is hardworking, willing to learn, and adamant. He hopes that the bosses out there will give him a chance. His wife had wanted to abort their child as she is worried that they would not be able to raise their baby. "We are almost quarreling every week for the past six months. She blames me for being useless, complaining that I am not resolute and aggressive enough in my job hunting." They have been married for twelve years and have all along been lovey dovey. At 35 she became pregnant, which should be a happy matter, but all are now in a mess since his unemployment. At the moment, he has persuaded his wife not to abort the child. He hopes to find a job as soon as possible and save enough money for milk powder for the arrival of their first child.   * from Lianhe Wanbao (19 Sep 2010, Sunday) by AE86  Read More →

It seems that in recent months, more and more youths are voicing their political opinions on the Internet. This could be due to the fact that the General Elections is just around the corner, and that the youths of Singapore are not as easily brainwashed unlike their predecessors. Youths today are better-educated and are much more willing to not accept things at face value. This could be due to the emphasis on "thinking skills" that was introduced by the Ministry of Education circa 1999. Whatever the reason, it can be said that the youths of today are more outspoken, more outward-looking and most importantly, better connected to the world at large. No more do they rely on the state's propaganda perpetrated by the publications under Singapore Press Holdings. Youths of today stay in touch with people from all over the world via social networking sites such as Facebook, get their news from many sources, such as Yahoo! and Google News and are generally more receptive to alternative points of view. However, like their predecessors, there still remains a lingering sense of fear amongst them to take the plunge into politics. Most of the time, they cite a lack of interest in politics - they think that politics is a very dry and boring subject - or they purposely hide their true feelings for fear that the PAP government will "mark" them for life. Who can blame them for thinking like that? After all, Social Studies is a compulsory subject in school. The biased Social Studies syllabus paints the PAP - and especially Lee Kuan Yew - as the founder of modern Singapore. Nothing could be further from the truth, for the real beginnings of modern Singapore began in 1819 with the arrival of Sir Stamford Raffles. Also, the schools portray the PAP as "heroes" who gallantly defended Singapore from the Communists. The villian in this case is almost always Lim Chin Siong, whose party (Barisan Socialis) is painted to be THE number one Communist threat to Singapore's survival in the 50s and 60s. Again, that is an obvious deviation from the truth, going by recently uncovered secret documents in the London Public Office. For more information, you are advised to read 'Comet In Our Sky' (available from Select Books - http://www.selectbooks.com.sg/) and Dr Chee Soon Juan's book 'A Nation Cheated' (also from Select Books). It is a given fact that most people do not voice their political opinions openly (and often using internet pseudonyms) for fear that the Internal Security Department (ISD) or Police might come knocking on their door. Tales of treatment at the mercy of the ISD are well-known by now. It is this culture of fear that stops youths of today from entering politics, together with political apathy and materialism. The kiasu (afraid to lose) and kiasi (afraid to die) attitude of Singaporeans in general are to blame for this. We have been taught from young to pursue the good life and leave politics to the all-knowing, all-powerful PAP. I still remember my grandmother telling me when I was a young boy that the PAP has the interests of the people at heart, and that all their policies (no matter how harsh) are for the good of Singaporeans. This happened sometime around the 1989 General Elections, where Serangoon Gardens was the battleground between the PAP and SDP. I was then 6 years old. Today, I believe strongly that all National Education lessons, as well as all the stories I have heard from my relatives about the superiority of the PAP's quality of governance are nothing but lies. Unfortunately, many people in Singapore, especially those who are not internet-savvy and the older generation are still trapped by the thought that the press is always right. Therefore, the first step to joining politics is: NEVER BELIEVE WHAT YOU READ IN THE PAPERS! I have experienced this myself when my case of "inciting violence and public disorder" was brought to the attention of the mainstream media. The newspapers in Singapore are obsessed with propping up the views of the ruling PAP elite and will not hesitate to distort facts and assassinate one's character. Most notably, the Political Desk of the Straits Times - whose editor was an ISD operative - will paint all Opposition party members as imbeciles, ingrates, liars and such like. The PAP, however, are heroes, wise men, learned and compassionate leaders of society. (I still keep an SMS conversation between myself and Jeremy Au-Yong of the ST Political Desk, where he apologized when I pointed out a grave mistake in an article about me. I may need to use it someday in my political career.) There are many sources of alternative news, such as the opposition newspapers (Hammer (WP) and The New Democrat (SDP) are popular ones) and news blogs (The Online Citizen, Singapore Angle, Temasek Review, Yawning Bread, etc). Whilst no one news source can be taken as the gospel truth, they can provide another angle to the news that may sometimes escape notice or mention in the mainstream media. Of course, this is not to mention the fact that such news sources frequently do not censor information, and can sometimes precede the mainstream news sources in bringing up-to-date information (the YOG food poisoning scandal is a recent example). In conclusion, I again stress the fact that the first step to joining politics for youths in Singapore is NEVER TO BELIEVE THE PRESS 100%! Take every piece of news in both the state media (including TV) with a large grain of salt. Always read widely, and read alternative points of view. Do not be blinkered by the mainstream media, and always question what you read, no matter if it is The Straits Times or Temasek Review (two opposite sides of the media spectrum).   Abdul Malik  Read More →