TR EMERITUS

I read the article "I trusted PAP for far too long" and "I am Sengkang voter", I totally agree with their observations. I said the same thing about two decades ago to all my friends and relatives, few people agreed with me and even said I am hardcore opposition. Today, I am proven right, those who did not agree with me, many of them are without jobs, driving PHV or self employed. They seem to start to see the true colours of PAP. But of course, many are so conditioned and fearful of change. And to my dismay, many still say they will void the votes. This is to the extent the fear of Singaporean voters that they are angry or unhappy with PAP but will still fear of voting against them. I watched RP presentation on National TV, yes they were not good but I still voted for them. Charles Yeo although did not speak well, he tried his best. People were laughing at home and pouring sarcasm, the issue here is will how many of us will stand? This man is a lawyer, he has bright future but he is willing to stand, why would we want to look down on him and not look at ourselves? Many people told me they disliked PAP but still voted PAP because RP cannot make it. Some even void their votes. Singaporean is weak mentally and fearful, they always find reason for things. If PAP is not serving us well, even a monkey come for election, we should vote the monkey isn't it? With such votes going to PAP, they are encouraged to push us very hard with their lousy policies. And we will be on the receiving end for next four years. The plan for 6.9M or 10M is certainly on, as you know these days, NDPs are attended by mainly by foreigners; PRs and new citizens. And this year, to promote new migrant, they have ex-Indonesian singing NDP song. Isn't this obvious that they are enticing and promoting to foreigners who are imported into this tiny island to convert to new Singaporeans? Things are not going to change, we are going to see more and more foreigners imported and converted, we will see abundance of locals being replaced at their jobs. For more than two decades, I told so many the same thing but most people just bear with the pain. Today, the anger has resulted another loss of GRC but remember, the numbers are still too small to stop those lousy polices being launched against citizens. Remember PAP will not change, they will always do what they want to do. For next four years, life will be tougher and will see more and more migrants becoming new locals. If you do not reflect from now till then and stand up, just be prepared to suffer the consequence.   Oliver Foo      Read More →

Many Singaporeans are angry at the inflow of foreigners who take over their jobs and become new citizens. They vent their anger against the immigrants. I hold a different view. I understand that the migrants also face a challenge in adapting to a new country and culture. Their families also face the same difficulty. Singaporeans will also face similar difficulties when they migrate to another country. They also have to face the xenophobic reaction from the locals there. There are advantages to a country to welcome immigrants who can contribute to the dynamism of their economy and society. However, in the case of Singapore, the problems caused by the migrants to the local workforce is daunting and disruptive to a harmful extent. They overcome the benefits that are brought by the immigrants. Why is this the case? Employers in Singapore prefer to employ foreigners, rather than locals, for the following reasons: a) They have to incur the cost of CPF contributions for employing locals b) They have to suffer disruption in their operations when the locals are called up for reservist duties. While the employer have to pay a levy for employing foreign workers at the lower levels, which help to equalize the wage cost to some extent, they are exempt from paying the levy for higher level foreigners on employment pass. I do not understand the logic of exempting the higher level foreigners from the levy. It is a glaring anomaly which has been ignored by the PAP ministers for two decades! There are other factors that make the employer prefer to employ foreign workers, such as the difference in  work attitude and expectations between locals and foreign workers. I believe that this can be corrected, if the two factors outlined earlier are sorted out. It is very disappointing that several manpower ministers failed to recognize the root cause of the problems and address them properly during the past two decades. Instead, their introduced ineffective measures, such as the "fair employment framework". They did not work and caused a loss of many years. It will be a blemish on their records. History will judge them. It is very important for the government to take the following actions immediately: a) Introduce the levy on employment pass holders. b) Exempt citizens from reservist duty after they pass the age of 25 years c) Provide a wage subsidy for small employers to employ locals - so that these jobs can give an adequate income to the workers and be viable for the small businesses. I wish to give these suggestions for the next minister of manpower to consider. Do you agree? Tan Kin Lian        Read More →

During Singapore’s recently concluded General Election, I received a few notes from friends commenting about the lack of diversity amongst the ruling party’s candidates. While the ruling party did field candidates with Muslim sounding names, there were no noticeable Indian faces. To compound matters, the Deputy Prime Minister (or Prime Minister in-waiting) had said that the public was “not ready for a non-Chinese Prime Minister.” These words were repeated endlessly thus portraying the ruling party as a bastion of racial privilege. Having lived as an ethnic minority in the UK for my formative years, I get the criticism of the ruling party’s lack of diversity in its candidates. When you are part of a minority, there’s something strangely appealing about being with and speaking with your own kind. In nearly a decade of living in the UK, London’s Chinatown always felt like a comfort zone. Although English is to all intents and purposes “my language” and my friends from that era of my life were all white Anglo-Saxons, there was something comforting about being with people who looked like me and hearing and communicating in something other than English. However, as I’ve grown older and moved around more, I’ve come to question the value of having a “token” minority around. Do people of a different colour with a seat in a national legislature or on the board of directors make a country’s minorities more comfortable or business more appealing to different customers? If I take myself as an example, I was told that by my Western friends that I should brush up on my Chinese and become a bridge between East and West. However, if I look at myself objectively, I have to ask what type of bridge would I be. The only thing I have in common with most Chinese is the colour of my skin. While I can communicate in verbal Mandarin and Cantonese, I do so badly and I am Chinese illiterate (I communicate with Chinese via Google translate). Instead of being a “bridge” between East and West, my real value was the fact that I was once an ethnic minority. The only time I get obvious delight from people is a professional setting is when I meet English lawyers and speak to them in a recognizable accent and understand that London is not the only part of the UK. Instead of being the bridge between the Occident and Orient, I gel most easily with people who don’t look like me – being able to discuss the value of Wasim Akram as a fast bowler or Sachin Tendulkar’s batting has proved to be invaluable from a commercial relationship building exercise. If I look at my own experiences as an example, I have to question the value of tokens. What does the token this or that in the cabinet or on the board of directors actually done for their community that they are supposed to come from? Sure, there is an extreme of people feeling most comfortable with their own kind. Hence you have Chinese hiring Chinese, Indians hiring Indians and as an Australian friend pointed out, short people preferring to hire short people. I am a bald man who got hired by another bald man. However, with tokens, the opposite is true. Chances are, they become so grateful to be part of what they perceive to be a “selective” group that once in the group, they do their best to ensure their own kind don’t get in. One merely has to observe how immigration officers of South Asian decent treat South Asians trying to enter the UK. It is, as one Englishman put it – a case of “drawing up the drawbridge.” The most famous example of how a “token” ethnic minority has worked against her own community can be found in the form of Priti Patel, the British Foreign Secretary. The nicest thing about Ms. Patel is that she is pretty to look at. Priti Patel Pretty but Not by Policy. However, if you look at her actions, you will notice that they are anything but pretty. Ms. Patel, who is the daughter of Gujurati migrants, who came to Uganda after they were thrown out of Uganda (the people who made the Ugandan economy tick and would later reward Britain for generosity by doing for the British economy what they had done in Uganda), has famously been part of the “hard line” Brexit faction of the Conservative Party and has supported the scrapping of various human rights and environmental protection policies. Ms. Patel’s career in both the private and public sector have involved speaking up for the unsavory. She has helped her husband, a marketing consultant to the tax payers kitty and as Home Secretary, she has notoriously come up with the most hardline immigration policy the UK has ever implemented. By her own admission, her own parents would have never have been allowed to enter the UK. A concurrence with my views on Ms. Patel can be found at: [LINK] I am admittedly racist in favour of South Asians trying to enter the UK. In the years that I lived in the UK, these were the most hard-working group who created businesses and made a better life for themselves. The guys begging me for small change were never people of colour, they either opened corner shops or hustled to get you into a mini-cab. It was inevitably the native-born whites who hustled you for small change and got uppity when you refuse to give over the pennies that had been worked for. When someone like Ms. Patel comes with a hardline immigration policy and bleats on about “taking control of OUR borders,” I read it as “Enhancing racial superiority of the lay abouts who would happily murder people who look like me.” I think of a talk given by the British High Commissioner at a law firm that I’ve worked with. For the better part of the talk, she went on about how Brexit was great because we were “taking control of OUR borders.” Then, a White Anglo-Saxon asked her about the “Weaponising of Racism” and described how his wife, who is “non-white” was frightened about returning to the UK. Her Excellency didn’t seem to think that policies set by Ms. Patel were in anyway damaging to this man’s family. In fairness to Ms. Patel, she isn’t the only ethnic minority who has made a career screwing her own kind. There’s Nikki Haley (Real Name - Nimrata Nikki Randhawa), former US Ambassador to the UN, who is the daughter of Sikh Immigrants (read – people who set up businesses and go to work). While Ms. Haley has been significantly more calculated in her policies than Ms. Patel, she’s also supported hard line policies on immigration, particularly those of the Trump Administration (read – tough fighters who run away when it comes to fighting people who can fight back) Closer to home, there’s the example of Mr. Samy Velu, who was chairman of the Malaysian Indian Congress for 30-over years. Mr. Velu was very good at staying in public office. He was very good at ensuring that he and his cronies got very rich of public contracts (he was famous for collecting tolls). He was rather less good at doing anything for Malaysia’s Tamil population, who continue to be a kicked upon minority. In Singapore, we have token ethnic minority ministers who have become very prominent for being, well good spokespeople for the establishment. I think of our often law and home affairs (apparently there’s no conflict of interest between making and enforcing laws), Mr. K. Shanmugaratnam, who accused to rappers from an ethnic minority of stirring racial tensions because they had the audacity to call out a tasteless add which involved someone from the ethnic majority painting his face brown. It takes an ethnic minority to tell ethnic minorities to stay in their place – you are not allowed to get upset when the majority makes offensive remarks about you. This isn’t just at the minister level. It’s always visible at immigration. Think of the South Asian immigration officers at any British port waiting to humiliate potential migrants from South Asia. I think of the time when I had a US Green card and wanted to snap it in half and fling it at the immigration officer. It was no coincidence that the officer in question was …..Chinese. In all my years of traveling to the US, I’ve never had a problem with anyone else. It’s not just about race. It also applies to sex. For all of Donald Trump’s obvious sexism and bragging about sexual assault (grab them by the pussy), he was actually supported by an alarming number of women, who didn’t want another woman in power. Think about this, men will help women, particularly attractive ones. Put it crudely, we’ll do anything to have a woman consider us worthy as bed partners. The worst enemy of woman on the rise (particularly an attractive one), is another woman, who will inevitably view her as competition. I believe in diversity. I think of places like London or New York, which stand out for economic vibrance, innovation and artistic creativity. Places like these tend to be diverse in more than one way. However, you can use tokenism to create diversity. You have to grow it from the bottom up. The token black, white, Asian, Latino, woman, homosexual etc, tends to do the opposite of create diversity. They’re there to ensure nobody takes their place as the only this or that in that position. Rather than worrying about more brown faces during an election, I’d prefer to hear more Yellow faces talking about giving Brown faces a fairer deal. Rather than a token woman on the board, how about more men promoting women. Tokens exist to enforce the status quo. I remember an Indian security guard at my Dad’s condo many years ago. He actually took pride in explaining why it was correct that the company he worked for had a policy of not hiring Indians. If that doesn’t say it all, what does?   Tang Li *Although I’ve been based mainly in Singapore for nearly two decades, I’ve had the privilege of being able meet people who have crossed borders and cultures. I’ve befriended ministers and ambassadors and worked on projects involving a former head of state. Yet, at the same time, I’ve had the privilege of befriending migrant labourers and former convicts. All of them have a story to tell. All of them add to the fabric of life. I hope to express the stories that inspire us to create life as it should be      Read More →