TR EMERITUS

A Singapore Airlines plane carrying 444 passengers from Paris to Singapore was forced to return to the French capital at the weekend because of engine problems, the carrier said Monday. The problem on the Airbus A380 jet was detected around two and a half hours into flight SQ333 out of Paris on Sunday afternoon, it said. "An engine message was reported in the cockpit and following checklist procedures, the affected engine was shut down," an airline spokesman told AFP. "While the aircraft is able to operate with three engines, the pilots decided to return to Paris as a precaution due to the long flight." It said the plane was set to undergo an engine change in Paris and that stranded passengers would be put on other flights. Singapore Airlines was the first carrier to use the A380. It flies the world's biggest passenger jet from its home base in Singapore to Melbourne, Sydney, London, Tokyo and Hong Kong, as well as Paris. The so-called superjumbo can carry up to 853 passengers but Singapore Airlines has chosen a setup with a maximum 471 seats. - AFP  Read More →

Video taken by Amanda Lian, Social Correspondent Background: Over 300 guests turned up at Fortunate Restaurant on 25 September 2009 to celebrate the first anniversary of the founding of the Reform Party whose Secretary-General is Mr Kenneth Jeyaretnam, the elder son of opposition icon Joshua Benjamin Jeyaretnam PART 1 PART 2 Kenneth's speech in text: Good Evening, Ladies and Gentlemen. I would like to extend a warm welcome to you, on this the Reform Party’s First Anniversary Dinner. It is good to see so many people here tonight, diplomats from around the world and representatives of most of the active Opposition parties in Singapore but most importantly it is good to see Reform Party members, their families and all our supporters. And what a lot of you there are. You are the reason we are here today. Thank you. So, The Reform Party is one year old - Well not quite! Hungry Ghosts and Ramadan took precedence so The Reform Party is actually 14 months old. But, it is of course, almost exactly one year after the founder of the Reform Party, the late Mr. J. B. Jeyaretnam, passed away. Almost a year since JBJ stood in this restaurant on this stage and said, “Cast off the slumber into which you have been led for the last 50 years, wake up to your rights as a human being, to your proper role as citizens of this country.” And it is one year since JBJ was interviewed by Hugo Restall of the Wall Street Journal. In that interview JBJ said he was often accused of talking too much about politics so now he was going to speak about economics. For my part, I speak too often of economics. I’m confident you all know by now that I am an economist. But I am also a politician, a politician who has the honour, the privilege, and the responsibility of leading Singapore’s brightest new Party, The Reform Party. So tonight, as is only right, I am going to speak about Politics. Recently we were given a history lesson in Parliament, by our Minister Mentor Mr Lee Kuan Yew, no less. We were told that in the US, despite the phrase from the Declaration of Independence that “all men were created equal”, it took till 1964 for the Voting Rights Act to be passed. This Act prevented the former slave-owning states in the US using a number of subterfuges to prevent black Americans from voting. It was then remarked that it took nearly another fifty years for America to elect its first Black President. I suppose that this was to illustrate that Singaporeans could not expect dramatic changes to the way they were governed when after all such reforms had taken 200 odd years in the US. The Analogy is in the first place bogus. If the lesson is that we are not to be impatient, that we are to be content with the system we have, that it is not unreasonable to wait another 50 years for change then that analogy must be followed to its logical conclusion. Our senior ministers should at this very time be saying to us “don’t worry that you are still travelling by Bullock Cart. Progress takes time. Even in America it took 150 years to invent the car.” But of course No-one in Parliament says any such thing. As any smart young nation would, we leapfrogged the technology bypassing the Penny Farthing and went straight to the MRT and LRT stages. We can make the same leaps with democratic processes. In any case, don’t be fooled. The lesson to be learnt from America is not the length of time it took for this to happen (even in 2007 who would have thought that a Black man with a Muslim name would become the next occupant of the White House) The lesson to be learnt is that this momentous event did not happen by magic. Instead there was a rising trend of registering Black voters resulting in increased Black participation in American political society and an increasing number of Blacks elected to both Federal and State legislatures and as Governors and Mayors. This culminated in record numbers of Black voters turning out in the presidential election of 2008, so that southern states that since at least the 1960s had always voted for a Republican candidate, suddenly turning Democrat and voted for Obama. So, Singaporeans, it won’t happen by magic. There is a process involved. If you desire a government that has at its heart a commitment to improve the lives of ordinary Singaporeans then you are the only people who can bring about those changes that put in place a chain of events that culminated in 2008 in the US with the election of Obama or this year in Japan with the victory of the Democratic Party, ending a virtually unbroken 55 year rule of the LDP. And it starts with Waking up! And then Signing up! As in America that process will begin with one person, then 10 then 100. Communism in Eastern Europe was finally put to rest when that first person climbed on the Berlin wall and started chipping away at it. I‘m not advocating mass disobedience, I’m reminding you that ultimately power resides in the people but if you are not prepared to climb on the wall in your mind and start chipping away at it then you will remain powerless. But it will not be easy. From every avenue The Government will tell you that there is no need to vote for the Opposition. In fact the Opposition is just a distraction. They have generously given us the NCMP and NMP schemes. Well let me tell you -The NMP scheme is a fundamental subversion of democratic principles that would be laughed at in any properly democratic country. Let me hear no more of NMP’s and their so called voices. Secondly it is ludicrous to equate NCMPs with NMPs when under our current GRC system 33% of those able to vote in the 2006 elections voted for Opposition candidates and yet the Opposition only won 2 out of the 84 seats in Parliament, which equates to 2.4% of the total. Let’s get that right- 33% of the votes resulting in 2.4 % of the seats. Enough of waiting 50 years! We need a government that will abolish the GRC system and go back to SMCs or move to a system of proportional representation where NCMPs would have the same powers as directly elected MPs. And what of the argument, often used by the Government in past elections and too often repeated unquestioningly by Singaporeans, that any constituency which votes for the Opposition will find itself moved to the back of the queue for HDB upgrading and other goodies. Firstly, the money does not belong to the Government; it belongs to you, the taxpayers. You earned it, you gave it to them for safekeeping and you should determine how it’s spent. I would stand the argument on its head and say to you, the people of Singapore, if you don’t vote for the Opposition then you will remain powerless to get the changes you desire, need and deserve - not just for your HDB estates but for your country and your lives But how can you vote for a representative if there isn’t one to be found? It is compulsory to vote in Singapore, unlike in the US and yet for too many of you voting is a meaningless exercise. You are effectively disenfranchised because the Opposition has been unable to find sufficient candidates and financial resources to contest more than half of the constituencies. In 2006 the PAP were able to gain 37 seats on Nomination Day without having to contest them, because candidates could not be found to stand in these constituencies. This is a travesty of how the democratic process is supposed to work and for those of you living in those constituencies you might as well be living in North Korea or China, for all the ability you have to choose your representative. So not only do we need you to vote, we also need those among you with the necessary abilities and determination to come forward and become candidates. So I am upping the ante. And adding Stand Up! to Wake Up! and Sign up! Finally, getting back to that History lesson and The US election campaign, I’d like to remind you of something Obama said frequently during his campaign taking a quote from the poet June Jordan by way of Alice Walker: “Change will not happen if we wait for some other person or some other time. We are the ones we’ve been waiting for.” If you want to see policies that put the welfare of ordinary Singaporeans first, then come out and support us The Reform Party, or another Opposition party – Because I will say this to all of you today: “You are the ones I am waiting for.” So Wake Up! Sign Up! Stand Up! ............or at the very least buy a T-shirt! Thank you again for supporting us here tonight and we look forward to growing numbers of you coming forward to join us as we contest our first elections. ©Kenneth Jeyaretnam 2009  Read More →

From our Correspondent In a rare biting editorial, the Senior writer of state-controlled Straits Times criticized the indicators revealed lately to assess the performance of Town Councils in Singapore. (read article here) Ms Chua wrote that "the problem is that some of these indicators depend too much on factors extraneous to town council management, and are not useful to residents." Quoting the example of arrears in S&C payments, Ms Chua opined that a high percentage of arrears is an indication of the demographics of the estate and a council that wants to look good on this rating may decide to be aggressive in recovering arrears from residents in financial hardship. "Given that arrears form 3per cent or $15million of the estimated $500million collected in S&CC each year, the impact of recovering a larger fraction of arrears on the overall financial health of a council will be negligible," she added. The nation-wide assessment of the performance of Town Councils was introduced by the National Development Ministry following the revelation that some PAP-run Town Councils had lost millions of dollars of sinking funds from failed credit-linked investments last year. The fiasco sparked a public backlash from residents who were unhappy with the rising S&C charges over the years. However, instead of placating Singaporeans, the Chairman of PAP Town Councils Dr Teo Ho Pin told the residents to be "grateful". Dr Teo defended the investments as necessary to generate "long-term" to returns for maintaining cyclical works in the estate. His argument cuts no ice with some Singaporeans who pointed out that the two opposition wards which did not invest their sinking funds in these risky investment products are run equally as well, if not better than PAP wards. For some strange reason, investment returns is not listed as an indicator of good management though it is the chief reason for the brouhaha in the first place. In a separate letter to the Straits Times Forum, Teo Kueh Liang called for a two-way dialogue between residents and town councils to shape the success of Town Council operations. The loss of sinking funds by the Town Councils have prompted residents to call for greater accountability and transparency in the management of their estates. With public anger dissipated and replaced by the usual sense of apathy, it is unsure if Singaporeans are willing to volunteer their time and energy to work with their Town Councils to make their estates a better place to live in.  Read More →