TR EMERITUS

If I were to tell people about LGBTQ Agenda 10 years ago, nobody would believe. But my comrades and I were already well aware of their agenda. By now, if you are still not aware of LGBTQ Agenda and the potential threat it will impose on our society, then you must be living in cave. Since Sunday till now, all LGBTQ KOLs and front covert organizations, have responded immediately with their Agenda written all over the internet once our naive Prime Minister has announced PAP's plan to repeal 377A. Back in 2011 GE, LGBTQ activists had sent emails to all political parties to ask them about their views on LGBTQ issues. This is a subtle pressure they tried to apply to all political parties, to project they are one united voting block. Interestingly, their questions have actually revealed their whole LGBTQ Agenda. Repeal 377A is just merely a small starter in their whole LGBTQ AGENDA route map. Other than Repeal 377A, the main aim is to: 1) Promote their LGBTQ ALTERNATIVE LIFESTYLE 2) Attain special privileges, status and concessions in the guise of being the "imaginery victims of social political discrimination" 3) Such privileges would include special mention, promotion and indoctrination of young impressionable minds to the acceptance of LGBTQ gay sex as "Normal" and Legitimate Choice for these youngsters to choose. 4) Using the False Premise of Equal Rights to attain legitimate Same sex marital status. The route map was already set out way back in 2011GE. It is extremely naive for anyone to think that these militant LGBTQ would be contended and satisfied with the mere Repeal of 377A agenda. That is always regarded as the beginning, not the end for their whole Agenda. The execution of plans to achieve their LGBTQ Agenda is carefully planned. I have numerous LGBT friends and most of them are smart, intelligent, creative and brilliant people. Although their sexual orientation isn't Normal to me, but they are exceptional people. They understood how their game plan works and with the support of their foreign counterparts and sponsorship from foreign entities, they are pretty well organized. Breaching the first obstacle 377A would open up all the fronts to them legitimately. Let me give an example of their logic. If Gay Sex is criminalized, there is no basis for anyone to say that they could talk about, teach others about it or even providing education to young children to tell them this sexual conduct is alright and it is legitimate and lawful. But once Gay Sex is decriminalized, they will take full opportunity like what they are doing right now, immediately after PM Naive Lee announcement is made, to insist that since Gay Sex is no longer illegal, it would not be illegal to talk about it, write books about it, include gay sex in the sex education curriculum for youngsters, in essence, promoting gay sex as legitimate and lawful! They could come into the open to conduct public talks, seminars on how gay sex work for everyone! This is why it is important for them to seek repeal of 377A, nothing to do with potential threat of being charged for poking each other's backside in their private bedrooms but rather, removing the legal obstacle for them to promote their sexual lifestyle publicly. This is also why AWARE which is supposed to be about upholding woman's rights but turned into the covert front for this LGBTQ AGENDA jumped in quickly to voice out the "rights" to include gay sex education for the youngsters! My comrades and I have long recognized such danger of LGBTQ Agenda and their whole game plan. We have come to the final conclusion and consensus that we may agree to Repeal of 377A BUT IF ONLY IF the curb and ban of the promotion of LGBTQ Lifestyle must be put in place. That is most important other than preventing the definition of marital status to be changed to include same sex marriage. LGBTQ and their sexual orientation or conducts may be exceptional but could never be regarded as " Normal". They are exceptional people with exception sexual conducts. We can live with that. But from the social and political angle such exceptionality cannot be promoted as a choice of lifestyle. This has nothing to do with "discrimination" but rather a practical natural view on survival of our human species and Nation. We don't promote heterosexuality because that's the natural default Norm. All species are created naturally to survive via the normal procreation process. There might be outliers or exceptional occurrences but the Natural Law is for the species to extend its lineage. Any human intervention that defies such laws of nature will only result in self induced extinction. LGBTQ Agenda is an attempt or intervention that is designed to work against Nature under the guise and pretence of fighting against discrimination or upholding of their rights. It should not be allowed. Is there any systemic discrimination of LGBTQ in jobs? Do they suffer more unemployment? Workplace discrimination? The latest poll doesn't seem to support that notion. Most Singaporeans do not view LGBTQ negatively or discriminate them. But that doesn't mean they would regard promotion of gay sex or LGBTQ as lifestyle choice agreeable or tolerable. I guess PAP has misread the latest poll results and naively think that repealing 377A would please the LGBTQ so to get their votes in the next elections. Instead, PAP has opened up a big Basket of Snakes, not just worms, that would become extremely messy and create great social distability.   Goh Meng Seng      Read More →

Health minister Ong Ye Kung says that re-infection cases makes up 5.5% of Covid cases this month. (ST 25/8/22) This means that the remaining 94.5% are first time infections. Given that 70% of the population has already been infected, and yet they make up only 5.5% of infections, shows that immunity conferred by previous infection is very strong. In fact, Mr Ong says that data has shown that the probability of reinfection eight months after the first infection is still very low - at around 5% - compared with someone who has not been infected before. Almost all the people who were infected this month have been vaccinated, given our very high vaccination rate, and yet immunity did not come from vaccination, but previous infection. This says a lot about the effectiveness of the vaccine. Many people I know take their booster not in the knowledge that it will boost their immunity, but rather that they want to keep their vaccinated status. That vaccination does not confer immunity was clear as early as mid 2021 when only a portion of the population was vaccinated. At that time, MOH was still publishing data of daily infections classified by vaccination status. One could therefore calculate the infection rates in the vaccinated and the unvaccinated populations. The data clearly showed that the infection rates were not very different, meaning the probability of getting infected was no different whether one was vaccinated or not. In other words, the vaccine was hopeless in conferring immunity. Shortly thereafter, MOH stopped publishing the data by vaccination status. The narrative of the vaccine then changed from conferring immunity to reducing severity of symptoms and probability of death. The new narrative was difficult to prove or disprove in real life due to confounding factors. To prove that, one has to neutralize all confounding factors as in the Phase 3 trials of the vaccine, but that was never done. In any case, the new narrative was enough to scare people into taking the vaccine. There is a cost to vaccinating and boosting the population. Besides the financial cost, there is the risk of side effects, including death, and unknown long term side effects. Mr Ong intends to vaccinate babies, boost children and teenagers, and make adults take a second booster. Given the mildness of the disease and the very low death rate on the one hand, and the ineffectiveness of the vaccine in conferring immunity but ironically depends on previous infection to do that, on the other hand, how does Mr Ong square the costs and the benefits of the vaccine?   Foong Swee Fong      Read More →

I agree with lhl when he said during his recent NDR speech that 'when it comes to top talent, we will never have enough' and the answers are obvious. We only have a small population base and our people are largely the products of a highly regulated, conditioned and inferior gene stocks that will almost always spontaneously obey and suck pap government's agendas than being innovative, daring, independent and deep thinking. Many bigger countries are also competing for talents worldwide and the UK government's recent policy of waving and welcoming graduates from the world's top 50 universities is one clear example. Let alone us Singapore. Going forward, in order to win, we will need more brain power than ever before and it is imperative that we must garner our fair share of the world's best and brightest to spearhead and drive new sunrise industries and technologies, however, the pap government from Goh Chok Tong's time in office had shot itself in their own foot and they have not recovered. Over the past 3 decades or so, the pap government has opened our floodgates and let in waves and waves of foreigners whom they had deliberately called 'Foreign Talents'. Granted there were some true foreign talents among them but by and large, the term 'Foreign Talents' have been loosely used and dragged through the mud courtesy of the pap government for far too long. Too many foreign IT professionals who could never make it to the top league of their profession in their own countries or in western countries landed here in Singapore and we worship them until heaven. Moreover, I dare say that many Singaporeans who work alongside those so called foreign talents are least impressed with both their talents and juices... To me, 'Foreign Talents' have become dirty words. Our overall eco-system to compete and attract truly talented foreigners to come, work and live in Singapore is decent but they must be further enhanced. I ask myself if I were a truly talented foreigner, entrepreneurial, innovative, motivated or a high net worth foreigner, what attractiveness do I see in Singapore? Among the reasons, having a competitive tax rates would be obvious, a corruption free environment, political stability, low crime rate, good quality schooling for my children, cosmopolitan, modern conveniences for my family and ease of traveling..... On our side, many thinking Singaporeans are reasonable people and one of their top grievances is that many foreigners do not serve NS and this, the pap government has failed for a very long time to seriously tackle it fairly and firmly. Attracting foreign talents must be seen to be mutually beneficial even at the people to people level. Life everywhere is a matter of give and take and not just take and take, nevermind whether the foreigners are younger or older than 30 years old like what that old naive Ng EH has argued and expoused so eloquently in Parliament. In conclusion, attracting True Foreign Talents, yes but passing off mere mediocre foreign workers as 'foreign talents' who end up cannibalise, undercutting Singaporeans at our work places, salaries and burdening our public infrastructures, a firm No! Looking back, Goh Chok Tong and his manpower ministars were far from being street-smart and as a result, Singaporean workers lose out even until today in our own country. By now, if we haven't learned enough that all that glitters isn't gold and not all the beautiful women who smile, blink and wave at you is a godsend darling, then we can continue to blissfully suck bigger bananas supplied by the pap government. Think.   Simon Lim      Read More →