TR EMERITUS

The last week has brought a distinct feeling of deja vu. Firstly, we had the decision to close Yale-NUS, which was spun as economic but was clearly a political decision. After Singapore promised that there would be freedom of thought and expression on campus, it became increasingly cleat that this was unacceptable to the Government. Such is the degree of top-down control that Lee Hsien Loong’s Government exerts over the university that even a relatively innocuous module that was to be taught in 2019 by playwright Alfian Sa’at was unacceptable to the authorities. Clearly the authorities were worried that if they did not clamp down now it would become a hotbed of dissent and maybe a source of potential future Opposition candidates among the students there. It is rumoured that student assistance to the Workers Party, which must have seemed to the students to be a relatively safe option given the PAP’s endorsement of Workers Party under Pritam Singh, in Sengkang was the last straw. Secondly, judgement was given in the libel suit brought by the PM against Terry Xu from The Online Citizen. Given the statistically improbable run of success the PM and his PAP cronies have enjoyed before the courts where he appoints the judges and his AG controls their promotion or demotion, the finding of defamation and the quantum of damages ($210,000) was not a surprise (though vastly reduced in real terms from the damages that the courts routinely ordered my father to pay), even though in this case the PM chose not to sue his siblings who had been the source of the alleged libel. Singapore often claims that it follows UK law and that therefore there is rule of law in Singapore. However, even in the UK, which is seen as one of the friendliest forums for defamation claimants, litigants are required to prove that they have suffered economic loss as a result of the libel. This was the argument that George Carman made when he defended my father in the defamation suit brought by “Swiss standard of living“ Goh after the 1997 General Election. Carman forced Goh to agree that far from suffering an economic loss, he had had an “excellent” year. The judge hearing the suit, Rajendran, agreed because he only awarded Goh $20,000 in damages. Goh, as everyone knows, appealed and got the damages increased to $100,000 without economic justification. Similarly LHL’s damage award bears no relation to any economic loss he has suffered. He continues to draw over $2 million a year in salary and his wife continues as CEO of Temasek until she steps down in October. Her salary, estimated to be in the tens if not hundreds of millions of dollars a year, continues to be paid. LHL is in no danger of being unseated as PM until such time in a year or five or ten years that he decides to step down. The only difference between now and JBJ’s time is that with the rise of the internet and social media it has become much easier for those on the receiving end of outrageous damages awards to raise the money. Or at least that is the standard reason given. The real reason is that Singaporeans were too scared of helping JBJ and the Lees and their friends made clear that if one suit was paid off they would just bring another claim, in what was aptly called a flagrant abuse of the judicial process and something that our judges, even if they owed their appointment, salary and promotion to the PM and his AG, should never have allowed. Thirdly, and proving that nothing has changed with Lee’s authoritarian Government since the supposedly bad old days of the twentieth century, the Infocomm Media Development Authority (IMDA) is now taking action against TOC for receiving foreign donations and will probably suspend it permanently. This again is reminiscent of his dad’s tactics of using different state agencies to come after his opponents like JBJ. Despite Terry Xu not posing much of a threat to LHL’s hegemony, the latter is also using his AG to pursue archaic and repressive criminal defamation charges as well as contempt of court actions against Xu. Chillingly, the examples cited to justify claims of foreign interference (The Eastern Sun and The Singapore Herald) were from the 1970s: “Singapore was a target of two such operations in the 1970s involving newspapers The Eastern Sun and the Singapore Herald. These newspapers received funding from foreign sources and ran articles that sought to undermine Singapore’s nation-building efforts,” I remember my parents had The Singapore Herald (TSH) delivered to our house and as a 13 year old I read about the desperate David v Goliath battle they fought against LKY’s determination to close them down as the last independent media outlet. There was a famous cartoon showing LKY as a tank driver about to crush TSH depicted as a baby in a nappy. At the time there were many claims by LKY and his Government that TSH were being funded by the CIA but not a shred of evidence was ever produced and it was without doubt a lie. The bogeyman of foreign interference was produced to justify the introduction of the Newspapers and Printing Presses Act. Interestingly IMDA says that the articles undermined “Singapore’s nation-building efforts”. Strangely Singapore’s interests always coincide with keeping the Lees in power thus safeguarding their financial interests providing a perfect illustration of the poster that hung in my dad’s office with a quotation from John Locke, the Enlightenment philosopher, “When political power is used for private gain, tyranny prevails.” Like a broken record demonstrating that the PAP are bankrupt of new ideas, IMDA repeats the lies and disinformation which have become part of the brainwashing of all Singaporeans from school age onwards. This is that they are incapable of making their own judgements and need a totalitarian state to tell them what to read and think. Of course as the Government is the only agent empowered to use the Protection from Online Falsehood and Manipulation Act (POFMA) it can repeat the lies without any sanction and individuals are powerless top stop it. There is worse. In a stunning non-sequitur, IMDA makes the extraordinary statement that “There have also been reports from other countries, that foreign players and their agents attempted to influence their politics by buying off political parties and individual politicians.” This seems to be more of a description of how the PAP Government operates in foreign countries, where it uses the resources of GIC and Temasek, built up by imposing austerity on Singaporeans, to bribe foreign academics and politicians and ro invest in Western countries in an influence buying exercise. Western universities like Oxbridge and the Ivy League are influenced by sending large numbers of Government scholars there, one of whose tasks is to spread disinformation. I have written about Joe Stiglitz, the Nobel Prize winner in Economics, who sang Singapore’s praises in helping its poor despite a higher Gini coefficient than the US. Stiglitz cited his Singapore students as sources of information. He has visited Singapore many times, no doubt flying first class and staying at Raffles, as a guest of the Government or its institutions. Obama and Michelle have also been invited to speak in Singapore as guests of the Bank of Singapore and dined with Lee Hsien Loong when they are here. Boris Johnson, the UK PM, has also enjoyed the PAP’s hospitality and probably used it to help pay for sex with his mistress Jennifer Arcuri. The list of examples of PAP influence buying are too numerous to mention. Keppel and Sembawang Marine, Temasek companies, have even been caught bribing Brazilian politicians directly in order to win business. Yet IMDA fails to cite any examples of when Singapore politicians have received foreign money. However the PAP have always sought to spread smears about Opposition politicians receiving money from abroad, most notoriously when a PAP MP falsely claimed in 1972 that the Workers Party had received $600,000 from abroad. My dad sued the MP and Radio Television Singapore (RTS), the predecessor to Mediacorp, for defamation. Demonstrating that Singapore’s judiciary will only allow defamation to be used by their paymasters, the judge ruled that my father had failed to prove the MP’s words since they were in Chinese and RTS carried them in English. The judge also let RTS off the hook, dismissing the libel action with costs. This was the gift that kept on giving, as WP’s inability to pay the costs allowed LKY to put it into bankruptcy and later secure my father’s debarment from Parliament on a fraudulent conviction that the Privy Council called “a grievous miscarriage of justice” but was unable to overturn due to the AG’s use of a shabby trick. There are many, including the Workers Party 2.0, who claim that Singapore has moved on and is becoming, or already is, a “robust” democracy (provided one is respectful of LHL and do not ask him any embarrassing questions or aspire to ever take over the Government. However recent events should cause the scales to drop from Singaporeans’ eyes and show that LHL has not changed. Singapore is still stuck in a time warp dating back to the 1970s.   Kenneth Jeyaretnam   I’m a Singaporean economist who became an opposition activist. I blog to provide an alternative to the porkies that the Pinkies tell. It just so happens that my alternative is the truth. That’s why I’ve never been sued in any civil or criminal court no matter how hard hitting my criticism. I’m quoted and interviewed and asked to speak across the world but largely censored in Singapore in an effort to silence my political opinions. The left hate me because they think I split their vote and because I eschew their outmoded economic models. Models that don’t work. The Right and the Conservatives hate me because I’m a liberal. I’m not sure what the middle think of me. I don’t think there are more than a handful of people in the middle, here in Singapore. I’m a Singaporean born and bred, dual heritage, my parents Singaporean established here before the State of Singapore was created. I’m not Eurasian. I read economics at Cambridge and could be broadly described as from the Keynesian school but I believe in interventions. I was formerly a successful hedge fund manager. After economics and politics my greatest interests are history, film and Makan. I run but I run so I can eat like a Singaporean.          Read More →

(CNA; 17 Sep) “Unvaccinated 72-year-old woman dies of COVID-19 complications; 906 new local cases in Singapore” It states that “There were 837 patients warded in hospital, most of whom were well and under observation, said MOH”. Also, of these, 77 cases of serious illness required oxygen supplementation and 12 were in critical condition in the intensive care unit (ICU)”. Comment: Since the MTF stopped disclosing the breakdown of the number of community cases into vaccinated & unvaccinated, the number of infected seems to have been on an uptrend. The number went from 347 (8 Sep) to 568 (10 Sep) to 832 (14 Sep) to a high of 906 yesterday – an all time high in more than a year! Arguably, the more worrisome part comes from those who are hospitalised - a week ago (9 Sep), the number of warded cases was 664, the number of those requiring oxygen supplementation was 33, and the number of those in ICU was 7. In other words, the number of warded cases has increased by 26% in just a week, the number requiring oxygen supplementation was 133%, whilst the number of ICU cases rose by 71%? As I have previously argued, the MTF has been rather purely reactive and operates with an apparent great lack of foresight, notably, refusing to ban travellers from the “Delta region” when the virus there was getting out of control. In such circumstances, it is, arguably, only a matter of time before the hospital and ICU wards run out of places. Would it not be more prudent to either increase the number of medical capacities or restriction measures? My friend Ying (not her real name) commented that it was very funny that Ministers could question if a fellow member of the house was from RI when there is, arguably, a bigger problem to tackle?   Leong Sze Hian      Read More →

Some time ago, PSP raised motion to discuss CECA, I sort of know the establishment will same strategy. The strategies have deployed repeatedly successfully over the years, they could be simplified into the few categories: 1. Against foreign investments 2. Against expats 3. Against foreigners, anti-foreigner. 4. Xenophobia and discrimination= 5. Racism Singaporeans by and large are cordial and multi-cultural and do not want to be labelled. So many people will shun away from such discussions when being labelled as such. WP had raised similar topics but were shot down by such accusations also, WP went quiet for very long time for fear of being labelled anti foreigner. These policies on population growth, FTs, CECA, PRs and new citizenships did not happen recently, it happened decades ago. During= that period, Singapore wasn't this crowded and most people have meaningful jobs. After many decades, the cracks becoming obvious, many local PMETs and grads are reduced to low level menial jobs like PHV, Grab Food or doing part time work. You think those who planned these policies did not anticipate all these issues? Today, more than half this country are foreign born, more and more jobs have gone to new migrants and their friends. This is why the anger and frustration have ballooned, locals hope elected oppositions will take this critical issue to parliament to see if they could force the establishment to make changes. But again, leopard cannot change its spots, they have not been transparent with statistics nor given straight answers to questions asked. The reason is why would they shoot themselves? So they always synchronize their strategies and quickly label those who question with the following labels: 1. Against foreign investments 2. Against expats 3. Against foreigners, anti-foreigner. 4. Xenophobia and discrimination= 5. Racism And you think the local Indian appearing on the banner of TP is coincidental? And MSM riding on instructions had use that to fan the above reasons and broadcast to the whole population. So MSM will keep stirring the same reasons on social media and news to block further discussions. We expect more and more locals relegated to low level menial jobs and the future of locals and children is surely bleak since we are relegated to second class in this country. All of us should tell your friends that these strategies are repeated and don't fall for the same tricks. Also more than half the country are foreigners who are very happy that the continual wide-open legs of FT gate will enable them bring their family, relatives and kampung friends to eat local lunches.   WuJi      Read More →